Simplified probabilistic choice set formation models in a residential location choice context

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-13

  Zolfaghari, Alireza ^a   Sivakumar, Aruna ^a   Polak, John ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choice set formation; Ordered probit; Semi compensatory models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894731257     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2013.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. R.L. Andrews, and A.K. Manrai Feature-based elimination: model and empirical comparison Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111 1998 248 267
2. R.L. Andrews, and T. Srinivasan Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data J. Mark. Res. 1995 30 41
3. G. Basar, and C. Bhat A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: an application to the San Francisco Bay Area Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 38 2004 889 904
4. â 1 Int. J. Res. Mark. 12 1995 9 24
5. M. Ben-Akiva, and S. Lerman Some estimation results of a simultaneous model of auto ownership and mode choice to work Transportation 3 1974 357 376
6. C.R. Bhat, and S. Srinivasan A multidimensional mixed ordered-response model for analyzing weekend activity participation Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39 2005 255 278
7. M. Bierlaire, R. Hurtubia, and G. Flötteröd Analysis of implicit choice set generation using a constrained multinomial logit model Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2175 2010 92 97
8. V. Cantillo, and J. Ortúzar A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39 2005 641 657
9. A. Caplin, and M. Dean Search, choice, and revealed preference Theor. Econ. 6 2011 19 48
10. Cascetta, E.,Paliara, F., Axhausen, K., 2007. The Use of Dominance Variables in Choice Set Generation.
11. E. Cascetta, and A. Papola Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 9 2001 249 263
12. I. Elgar, B. Farooq, and E.J. Miller Modeling location decisions of office firms Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2133 2009 56 63
13. B. Farooq, and E.J. Miller Towards integrated land use and transportation: a dynamic disequilibrium based microsimulation framework for built space markets Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract 46 2012 1030 1053
14. A. Fotheringham, C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis 2000 Sage Publications Ltd. London
15. A.S. Fotheringham A new set of spatial-interaction models: the theory of competing destinations Environment and Planning A 15 1983 15 36
16. M.J.I. Gaudry, and M.G. Dagenais The dogit model Transp. Res. 13B 1979 105 111
17. J.Y. Guo Addressing Spatial Complexities in Residential Location Choice Models (Ph.D) 2004 The University of Texas Austin
18. R.L. Hicks, and K.E. Schnier Spatial regulations and endogenous consideration sets in fisheries Resour. Energy Econ. 32 2010 117 134
19. J.L. Horowitz, and J.J. Louviere What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling? Int. J. Res. Mark. 12 1995 39 54
20. S. Kaplan, S. Bekhor, and Y. Shiftan Two-stage model for jointly revealing determinants of noncompensatory conjunctive choice set formation and compensatory choice Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2134 2009 153 163
21. S. Kaplan, S. Bekhor, and Y. Shiftan Development and estimation of a semi-compensatory residential choice model based on explicit choice protocols Ann. Reg. Sci. 2011 1 30
22. S. Kaplan, Y. Shiftan, and S. Bekhor Development and estimation of a semi-compensatory model with a flexible error structure Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 46 2012 291 304
23. S. Lerman, and H. Mahmassani The econometrics of search Environ. Plan. A 17 1985 1009 1024
24. A.K. Manrai, and R.L. Andrews Two-stage discrete choice models for scanner panel data: an assessment of process and assumptions Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111 1998 193 215
25. C. Manski The structure of random utility models Theory Decis. 8 1977 229 254
26. F. Martínez, F. Aguila, and R. Hurtubia The constrained multinomial logit: a semi-compensatory choice model Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 43 2009 365 377
27. T. Morikawa A hybrid probabilistic choice set model with compensatory and noncompensatory choice rules In: Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Transport Research 1995 World Transport Research Sydney, Australia pp. 317-325
28. F. Pagliara, and H. Timmermans Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review Transportation Letters 1 2009 181 196
29. G.R. Parsons, and A.B. Hauber Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand Land Econ. 74 1998 32 48
30. G.R. Parsons, D.M. Massey, and T. Tomasi Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation Mar. Resour. Econ. 14 1999 299 315
31. G. Punj, and R. Moore Information search and consideration set formation in a web-based store environment J. Bus. Res. 62 2009 644 650
32. Schirmer, P.,Van Eggermond, M.A.B., Axhausen, K.W., 2012. Reviewing measurements in residential location choice models. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research (IATBR), Toronto, Canada.
33. Scott, D.M., 2006. Constrained destination choice set generation: a comparison of GIS-based approaches. Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States.
34. A.D. Shocker, M. Ben-Akiva, B. Boccara, and P. Nedungadi Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: issues, models, and suggestions Mark. Lett. 2 1991 181 197
35. S. Siddarth, R.E. Bucklin, and D.G. Morrison Making the cut: modeling and analyzing choice set restriction in scanner panel data J. Mark. Res. 1995 255 266
36. P. Stopher Captivity and choice in travel-behavior models Transp. Eng. J. 106 1980 427 435
37. J. Swait Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 35 2001 643 666
38. J. Swait, and M. Ben-Akiva Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 21 1987 91 102
39. M. Termansen, C. Mcclean, and H. Skov-Petersen Recreational site choice modelling using high-resolution spatial data Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 36 2004 1085 1099
40. J.-C. Thill Choice set formation for destination choice modelling Prog. Hum. Geogr. 16 1992 361 382
41. K. Train A structured logit model of auto ownership and mode choice Rev Econ. Stud. 47 1980 357 370
42. A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice Psychol. Rev. 79 1972 281
43. J. Wu, and A. Rangaswamy A fuzzy set model of search and consideration with an application to an online market Mark. Sci. 2003 411 434
44. Zheng, J., Guo, J., 2008. Destination choice model incorporating choice set formation. Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, 13-1-2008 to 17-1-2008, Washington DC, United States.
45. Zolfaghari, A.,Sivakumar, A., Polak, J.W., 2012. Choice set formation in residential location choice modelling: empirical comparison of alternative approaches. Transportation Research Board (TRB), Washington DC, US.