Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand

Land Economics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 32-48

  Parsons, George R ^a   Hauber, A Brett ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOICE SET; FISHING; RANDOM UTILITY MODEL; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

MAINE; USA;

EID: 0031659123     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3147211     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adamowicz, W. L. 1994. "Habit Formation and Variety Seeking in a Discrete Choice Model of Recreation Demand." Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19 (1):19-31.
2. Andrews, T. 1996. "A Discrete Choice Model of Recreational Trout Fishing in Pennsylvania." Working Paper, West Chester University.
3. Atherton, T., M. Ben-Akiva, D. McFadden, and K. Train. 1990. "Micro-simulation of Local Residential Telephone Demand Under Alternative Service Options and Rate Structures." In Telecommunications Demand Modelling: An Integrated View, eds. A. Fontenay, M. Shugad, and D. Sibley. New York: North-Holland.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., and B. Boccara. 1995. "Discrete Choice Models with Latent Choice Sets." International Journal of Research in Marketing 12:9-24.
5. Bockstael, N. E., W. M. Hanemann, and C. L. Kling. 1987. "Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework." Water Resources Research 23 (5):951-60.
6. Creel, M., and J. Loomis. 1992. "Recreation Value of Water to Wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley: Linked Multinomial Logit and Count Trip Frequency Models." Water Resources Research 28 (10):2597-2606.
7. Feather, P. M. 1994. "Sampling and Aggregation Issues in Random Utility Model Estimation." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (4):722-79.
8. Haab, T. C., and R. L. Hicks. 1997. "Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34 (2):127-47.
9. Hauber, A. B., and G. R. Parsons. 1996. "Nesting Structure Choice in a Random Utility Model of Recreation Demand." Working Paper, University of Delaware.
10. Hausman, J. A., G. K. Leonard, and D. McFadden. 1995. "A Utility-Consistent, Combined Discrete Choice and Count Model: Assessing Recreational Use Losses Due to Natural Resource Damage." Journal of Public Economics 56:1-30.
11. Horowitz, J. L., and J. L. Louviere. 1995. "What Is the Role of Consideration Sets in Choice Modeling?" International Journal of Research in Marketing 12:39-54.
12. Jones, C. A., and Y. D. Sung. 1991. "Valuation of Environmental Quality at Michigan Recreational Fishing Sites: Methodological Issues and Policy Applications." Working Paper, University of Michigan.
13. Kaoru, Y., V. K. Smith, and J. L. Liu. 1995. "Using Random Utility Models to Estimate the Recreational Value of Estuarine Resources." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 (1):141-51.
14. Kling, C. L., and C. J. Thomson. 1996. "The Implications of Model Specification for Welfare Estimation in Nested Logit Models." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1):103-14.
15. Lupi, F., and P. M. Feather. 1995. "Site Aggregation in Random Utility Travel Cost Models: Using Partial Aggregation to Reduce Welfare Bias." Working Paper, Michigan State University.
16. McConnell, K. E., and I. E. Strand. 1994. "The Economic Value of Mid and South Atlantic Sportfishing." EPA Cooperative Agreement, Volume 2. University of Maryland.
17. Milon, J. W. 1988. "A Nested Demand Shares Model of Artificial Marine Habitat Choice by Sport Anglers." Marine Resource Economics 5:191-213.
18. Morey, E. R. 1998. "Two RUMs unCLOAKED: Nested-Logit Models of Site Choice and Nested-Logit Models of Participation and Site Choice." In Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models, eds., C. L. Kling and J. Herriges, chap. 4. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
19. Morey, E., R. D. Rowe, and M. Watson. 1993. "A Repeated Nested-Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (3):578-92.
20. Needelman, M. S., and M. J. Kealy. 1995. "Recreational Swimming Benefits of New Hampshire Lake Water Quality Policies: An Application of a Repeated Discrete Choice Model." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24 (1):78-87.
21. Parsons, G. R., and M. J. Kealy. 1992. "Randomly Drawn Opportunity Sets in a Random Utility Model of Lake Recreation." Land Economics 68 (Feb.):93-106.
22. Parsons, G. R., and A. J. Wilson. 1997. "Incidental and Joint Consumption in Recreation Demand." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 26 (1):1-6.
23. Peters, T., W. Adamowicz, and P. Boxall. 1995. "The Influence of Choice Set Considerations in Modelling the Benefits of Improved Water Quality." Water Resources Research 613:1781-87.
24. Shankle, S. A., J. E. Englin, W. H. Monroe, D. M. Beck, M. F. Casinelli, H. Saunders, and S. E. Grover. 1990. "Freshwater-Based Recreation in the Upper Northeast: Data Collection Documentation." Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Battelle Memorial Institute.
25. Shaw, W. D., and P. Jakus. 1996. "Travel Cost Models of the Demand for Rock Climbing." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25 (2):133-42.
26. Smith, V. K., and R. J. Kopp. 1980. "The Spatial Limits of the Travel Cost Recreation Demand Model." Land Economics 56 (Feb.):64-72.
27. Swait, J. 1984. "Probabilistic Choice Set Formation in Transportation Demand Models." Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
28. Waters, S. 1993. "Single Origin Zones and Multiple Sites: Extending the Discrete Choice Travel Cost Model." Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego.