Spatial regulations and endogenous consideration sets in fisheries

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 117-134

  Hicks, Robert L ^a   Schnier, Kurt E ^b  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consideration sets; Location choice; Spatial fisheries management

Indexed keywords

ALEUTIAN ISLANDS; CONSIDERATION SETS; DECISION AGENT; DECISION ENVIRONMENT; FINITE MIXTURES; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; LOCATION CHOICE; SPATIAL BEHAVIORS; SPATIAL EXTENT; SPATIAL REGIONS;

DECISION MAKING; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; LOCATION;

FISHERIES;

DECISION MAKING; ESTIMATION METHOD; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY MODELING; FISHERY REGULATION; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VALUATION;

ALASKA; ALEUTIAN ISLANDS; UNITED STATES;

PLEUROGRAMMUS;

EID: 77249140407     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allenby G.M., and Ginter J.L. The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. International Journal of Marketing Research 12 (1995) 67-80
2. Andrews R.L., and Srinivasan T.C. Studying consideration effects in empirical models using scanner panel data. Journal of Marketing Research 32 (1995) 30-41
3. Ben-Akiva M., and Boccara B. Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (1995) 9-24
4. Berry S. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1994) 242-262
5. Berry S., Levinson J., and Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63 (1995) 841-890
6. Chiang J., Chib S., and Narasimhan C. Markov chain Monte Carlo and model of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1999) 223-248
7. Curtis R., and Hicks R.L. The cost of sea turtle preservation: the case of Hawaii's pelagic longliners. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2000) 1191-1197
8. Dalton M.G., and Ralston S. the California rockfish conservation area and groundfish trawlers at Moss Landing harbor. Marine Resource Economics 19 (2004) 67-83
9. Gensch D.H. A two-stage disaggregated attribute choice model. Marketing Science 6 (1987) 223-239
10. Guenette S., Heymans S.J.J., Christensen V., and Trites A.W. Ecosystem models show combined effects of fishing, predation, competition and ocean productivity on Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 63 (2006) 2495-2517
11. Haab T.C., and Hicks R.L. Accounting for choice set endogeneity in random utility models of recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34 (1997) 127-147
12. Hicks R.L., and Strand I.E. The extent of information: its relevance for random utility models. Land Economics 76 (2000) 374-385
13. Hicks R.L., Kirkley J., and Strand I.E. Short-run welfare losses from essential fish habitat designations for the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. Marine Resource Economics 19 (2004) 113-129
14. Hicks R.L., and Schnier K.E. Dynamic random utility modeling: a Monte Carlo analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 (2006) 816-835
15. Hicks R.L., and Schnier K.E. Eco-labeling and dolphin avoidance: a dynamic model of tuna fishing in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56 (2008) 103-116
16. Hicks, R.L., Horrace, W.C., Schnier, K.E., 2008, Congestion Externalities and Fishing Vessels: the Game of "Where to Fish?" Working Paper, Department of Economics, Syracuse University.
17. Holland D.S., and Sutinen J.G. Location choice in New England trawl fisheries: old habits die hard. Land Economics 76 (2000) 133-149
18. Horowitz J.L., and Louviere J.J. What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling?. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (1995) 39-54
19. Horrace, W.C., Schnier, K.E., 2008. Estimation a Production Function for Highly-mobile Technologies. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Syracuse University.
20. Krinsky I., and Robb L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (1986) 715-719
21. Krinsky I., and Robb L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities: a correction. The Review of Economics and Statistics 72 (1990) 189-190
22. Lowe S., Ianelli J., Wilkins M., Aydin K., Lauth R., and Spies I. BSAI Atka mackerel. Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Groundfish Resources of the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands Regions (2006), North Pacific Fisheries Management Council, P.O. Box 103136, Anchorage, AK
23. MacLachlan G., and Peel D. Finite Mixture Models (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
24. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8 (1977) 229-254
25. Merrick R.L., Chumbley M.K., and Byrd G.V. Diet diversity of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) and their population decline in Alaska: a potential relationship. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 54 (1997) 1342-1348
26. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist A., et al. (Ed). Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (1978), North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam 75-96
27. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1974), Academic Press, New York, NY
28. McFadden D., and Train K.E. Mixed MNL models of discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (2000) 447-470
29. Nichol D.G., and Somerton D.A. Diurnal vertical migration of the Atka mackerel Pleurogrammus monopterygius as shown by archival tags. Marine Ecology Progress Series 239 (2002) 193-207
30. Parsons G.R., and Hauber A.B. Spatial boundaries and choice set definition on a random utility model of recreation demand. Land Economics 74 (1998) 32-48
31. Parsons G.R., and Kealy M.J. Randomly drawn opportunity sets in a random utility model of lake recreation. Land Economics 68 (1992) 93-106
32. Parsons G.R., Massey D.M., and Tomasi T. Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation. Marine Resource Economics 14 (1999) 299-315
33. Parsons G.R., Plantinga A.J., and Boyle K.J. Narrow choice sets in a random utility model of recreation demand. Land Economics 76 (2000) 86-99
34. Smith M.D. Fishing yield, curvature and spatial behavior: implications for modeling marine reserves. Natural Resource Modeling 17 (2004) 273-298
35. Smith M.D., and Wilen J.E. Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behavior. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 (2003) 183-206
36. Smith M.D., and Wilen J.E. Marine reserves with endogenous ports: empirical bioeconomics of the California sea urchin fishery. Marine Resource Economics 19 (2004) 85-112
37. Smith, M.D., Zhang, J., 2007. Sorting Models in Discrete Choice Fisheries Analysis. Selected paper, American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, OR.
38. Swait J. Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 643-666
39. Timmins C., and Murdock J. A revealed preference approach to the measurement of congestion in travel cost methods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 (2007) 230-249
40. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
41. von Hafen R.H. Latent consideration sets and continuous demand systems. Environmental and Resource Economics 41 (2008) 363-367