Revisiting the "Art Bias" in Lay Conceptions of Creativity

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 11-20

  Glǎveanu, Vlad Petre ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894653297     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2014.873656     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Chan, D., & Chan, L.-K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers' perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185-195.
3. Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Functional creativity: 'Products' and the generation of effective novelty. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook Of Creativity (pp. 301-317). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Feist, G. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Freud, S. (1970). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity: Selected readings (pp. 126-136). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1908)
6. Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
7. Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2012). The creative process in visual art: A longitudinal multivariate study. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 283-295.
8. García-Cepero, M. C., & McCoach, D. B. (2009). Educators' implicit theories of intelligence and beliefs about the identification of gifted students. Universitas Psychologica, 8, 295-310.
9. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Glǎveanu, V. P. (2011). Is the lightbulb still on? Social representations of creativity in a Western context. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21 (1), 53-72.
11. Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London, England: Routledge.
12. Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). The rehabilitation of common sense: Social representations, science and cognitive polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 431-448.
13. Karwowski, M. (2009). I am creative, but am I creative? Similarities and differences between self-evaluated Small and Big-C creativity in Poland. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19 (2), 7-26.
14. Lim, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115-130.
15. Lindauer, M. S. (1992). Creativity in aging artists: Contributions from the humanities to the psychology of old age. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 211-231.
16. Mace, M., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 179-192.
17. Morris, K. A., Ashburn-Nardo, L., & Padgett, R. J. (2011). Think fast: Using Web-based reaction time technology to promote teaching about racial bias and diversity. In D. S. Dunn, J. H. Wilson, J. E. Freeman, & J. R. Stowell (Eds), Best practices for technology-enhanced teaching and learning: Connecting to psychology and the social sciences (pp. 223-235). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France [University Presses of France].
19. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Paletz, S. B. F., Peng, K., & Li, S. (2011). In the world or in the head: External and internal implicit theories of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 83-98.
21. Patrick, C. (1937). Creative thought in artists. Journal of Psychology, 4, 35-73.
22. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
23. Puccio, G., & Chimento, M. (2001). Implicit theories of creativity: Laypersons' perceptions of the creativity of adaptors and inventors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 675-681.
24. Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: Process and way of life-Four key issues. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 189-215). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Romo, M., & Alfonso, V. (2003). Implicit theories of Spanish painters. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 409-415.
26. Rosenbaum, P. J., & Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21, 47-65.
27. Runco, M. (1999). Implicit theories. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, Vol. 2 (pp. 27-30). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Runco, M. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
29. Runco, M., & Bahleda, M. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93-98.
30. Runco, M., & Johnson, D. (2002). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427-438.
31. Saracho, O. (2012). Creativity theories and related teachers' beliefs. Early Child Development and Care, 182, 35-44.
32. Sen, R. S., & Sharma, N. (2011). Through multiple lenses: Implicit theories of creativity among Indian children and adults. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 273-302.
33. Spiel, C., & von Korff, C. (1988). Implicit theories of creativity: The conceptions of politicians, scientists, artists and school teachers. High Ability Studies, 9, 43-58.
34. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.
35. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tavani, J. L., Zenasni, F., & Pereira-Fradin, M. (2009). Social representations of gifted children: A preliminary study in France. Gifted and Talented International, 24, 61-70.
37. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. Sternberg (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43-75). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., & Themel, M. (1999). 'I have some faith and at the same time I don't believe'-Cognitive polyphasia and cultural change in India. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 10, 301-314.
39. Wickes, K. S., & Ward, T. (2006). Measuring gifted adolescents' implicit theories of creativity. Roeper Review, 28, 131-139.