Total knee arthroplasty at 15-17 years: Does implant design affect outcome?

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 235-241

  Victor, Jan ^a,b   Ghijselings, Stijn ^b   Tajdar, Farhad ^b   Van Damme, Geert ^b   Deprez, Patrick ^b   Arnout, Nele ^a   Van Der Straeten, Catherine ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b AZ St Lucas   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Implant design; Long term outcome; Polyethylene thickness; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84894541244     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2231-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kurtz SM, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780-785
2. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C (1993) Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:697-704
3. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S (2007) Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:53-60
4. Witvrouw E, Victor J, Bellemans J, Rock B, Van Lummel R, Vanderslikke R, Verdonk R (2002) A correlation study of objective functionality and WOMAC in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:347-351
5. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57-63
6. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1997) Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:79-86
7. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS (2001) Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:10-17
8. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Ke Z, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606-2612
9. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Aubaniac JM, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB, Lonner JH, Mahoney OM, Kinsey TL, John TK, Conditt MA (2009) The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(suppl 5):43-48
10. Van Loon CJM, Wisse MA, de Waal Malefijt MC, Jansen RH, Veth RPH (2000) The kinematic total knee arthroplasty. A 10- to 15-year follow-up and survival analysis. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 120:48-52
11. Buechel FF (2002) Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:40-50
12. Ito J, Koshino T, Okamoto R, Tomoyuki S (2003) 15-Year follow-up study of total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 18:984-992
13. Dixon MC, Brown RR, Parsch D, Scott RD (2005) Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:598-603
14. Duffy GP, Crowder AR, Trousdale RR, Berry DJ (2007) Cemented total knee arthroplasty using a modern prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 22:67-70
15. Baker PN, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Esler CN, Gregg PJ (2007) A randomized controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1608-1614
16. Paratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2143-2149
17. Callaghan J, Wells C, Liu S, Goetz DD, Johnston RC (2010) Cemented rotating platform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at at minimum of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1635-1639
18. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, Kim HJ (2012) Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:866-873
19. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD et al (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13-14
20. De Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB (2008) The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:16-27
21. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9-12
22. Bohl JR, Bohl WR, Postak PD, Greenwald AS (1999) The Coventry Award. The effects of shelf life on clinical outcome for gamma sterilized polyethylene tibial components Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:28-38
23. Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans J (2005) Kinematics of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:646-655
24. Harato K, Bourne RB, Victor J, Snyder M, Hart J, Ries MD (2008) Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee 15:217-221
25. Bourne RB, Laskin RS, Guerin JS (2007) Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics 30(8 suppl):83-85
26. Julin J, Jämsen E, Puolakka T, Konttinen YT, Moilanen T (2010) Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 81(4):413-419