Ten-year results of the first 100 genesis II total knee replacement procedures

Orthopedics

Volumn 30, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2007, Pages 83-85

  Bourne, R B ^a   Laskin, Richard S ^b   Guerin, J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548231653     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JV. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative and systemic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:963-974.
2. Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and total knee replacement. N Eng J Med. 1990; 323:725-731.
3. Lavernia CJ, Guzman JF, Gachupin-Garcia A. Cost effectiveness and quality of life in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; 345:134-139.
4. NIH Consensus Statement n Total Knee Replacement. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 2003; 20:1-32.
5. Hans SB, Nelson CL, Laskin RS. Posterior stabilized knee arthroplasty: an assessment of bone resection. Knee. 2000; 7:25-29.
6. Kaper B, Woolfrey M, Bourne RB. The effect of built-in external femoral rotation on patellofemoral tracking and complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15:964-969.
7. Kotani A, Yonekura A, Bourne RB. Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:850-856.
8. Laskin RS. Flexion space configuration in total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1995: 10:657-660.
9. Laskin RS. Total knee replacement using the Genesis II prosthesis: a five-year follow-up study of the first 100 consecutive cases. Knee. 2005; 12:163-167.
10. Ries MD, Salehi A, Laskin RS, Bourne RB, Rand JA, Gustilo RB. Can rotational congruity be achieved in both flexion and extension when the femoral component is externally rotated in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 1998; 5:370-342.
11. Westrich G, Agulnick MA, Laskin RS, Haas SB. Current analysis of tibial coverage provided by total knee arthroplasty systems. Knee. 1997; 4:221-226.
12. Westrich G, Laskin RS, Haas SB, Sculco TP. Resection specimen analysis of tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 309:163-176.
13. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CM, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
14. Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995; 22:1193-1196.
15. Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14.
16. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36), I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30:473-383.
17. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53:457-481.