The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options: Bicompartmental knee replacement: Why, why not, and what if?

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2009, Pages 46-

  Argenson, Jean Nöel A ^a   Mahoney, Ormonde M ^b   Kinsey, Tracy L ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b Athens Orthopedic Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONVALESCENCE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVOR; THERAPY EFFECT; ARTICLE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; REOPERATION; ROBOTICS; ACCURACY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT SELECTION; REOPERATION; ROBOTICS;

EID: 69449084443     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00406     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ; National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:893-900.
2. Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JD, Joslin CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:310-5.
3. O'Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-oneyear followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:27-37.