Introducing a learning management system at a russian university: Students' and teachers' perceptions

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 272-289

  Emelyanova, Natalya ^a   Voronina, Elena ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

E learning; Higher education; Learning management systems; Lms; Online learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894516213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14923831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1701     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrahams, D. (2004). Technology adoption in higher education: A framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption (Doctoral thesis). Cornel University, USA.
2. Abrahams, D. (2010). Technology adoption in higher education: A framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 2(2), 34-49.
3. Al-Busaidi, K., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors' satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18-39.
4. Alfadly, A. A. (2013). The efficiency of the "Learning Management System (LMS)" in AOU, Kuwait, as a communication tool in an e-learning system. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 157-169.
5. Almarashdeh, I., Sahari, N., Zin, N., & Alsmadi, M. (2011). Acceptance of learning management system: A comparison between distance learners and instructors. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 3(5), 1-9.
6. Benigno, V., & Trentin, G. (2000). The evaluation of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 259-270.
7. Blin, F., & Monro, M. (2008). Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, 475-490.
8. Boeker, M., & Klar, R. (2006). E-learning in the education and training of physicians. Methods, results, evaluation. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 49(5), 405-411.
9. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19-36.
10. Collis, B. (1995). Anticipating the impact of multimedia in education: Lessons from the Literature. Computers in Adult Education and Training, 2(2), 136-149.
11. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 319-340.
12. Freund, Y. (1988). Planner's guide: Critical success factors. Planning Review, 16(4), 20-25.
13. Georgouli, K., Skalkidis, I., & Guerreiro, P. (2008). A framework for adopting LMS to introduce e-learning in a traditional course. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 227-240.
14. Gillard, S., Bailey, D., & Nolan, E. (2008). Ten reasons for IT educators to be early adopters of IT innovations. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 21-33.
15. Graf, S. (2007). Adaptivity in learning management systems focusing on learning styles (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Technology, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://sgraf.athabascau.ca/publications/PhDthesis_SabineGraf.pdf
16. Keaster, R. (2005). Distance education and the academic department: The change process. Educause Quarterly, 28(3), 48-55.
17. Liaw, S., Huang, H., & Chen, G. (2008). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49, 1066-1080.
18. Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers and Education, 37(3-4), 377-386.
19. Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R., & Abrami, P. (2006). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. Computers & Education, 47(2006), 465-489.
20. Mijatovic, I., Cudanov, M., Jednak, S., & Kadijevich, D. (2012). How the usage of learning management systems influences student achievement. Teaching in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.753049
21. Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 127-133.
22. Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2012). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A lens of critical success factors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 337-350.
23. Ob itogakh UMD v 2011-2012 uch. godu. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.hse.ru/org/hse/aup/eduprocess/report_UMR
24. Papp, R. (2000). Critical success factors for distance learning. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, California, USA, 18(43).
25. Selim, H. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49, 396-413.
26. Soong, B., Chan, H., Chua, B., & Loh, K. (2001). Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & Education, 36(2), 101-120.
27. Steel, C. (2009). Reconciling university teacher beliefs to create learning designs for LMS environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 399-420.
28. Sun, P., Tsai, R., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50, 1183-1202.
29. Stationery Office. (2009). The learning revolution white paper. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills [DIUS].
30. Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.
31. Watts, N. (n.d.). Bringing online learning to a research-intensive university. eLearn Magazine. Education and Technology in Perspective. 2007. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1291534
32. Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, C.S. (2008). Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 30-41.
33. Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309.
34. Yoon, C., & Kim, S. (2007). Convenience and TAM in a ubiquitous computing environment: The case of wireless LAN. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 6(1), 102-112.