Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator

Accounting Review

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 303-330

  Gold, Anna ^a   Gronewold, Ulfert ^b   Salterio, Steven E ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audit quality; Climate; Error discovery; Error management; Error reporting; Working paper review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894359584     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr-50592     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (91)

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2009. A Firm's System of Quality Control. Statement on Quality Control Standard (SQCS) 7. New York, NY: AICPA.
2. Andrews, A., and S. Freeman. 2001. E-lessons learned. CA Magazine 134 (7): 22-26.
3. Antle, R., and B. Nalebuff. 1991. Conservatism and auditor-client- negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Supplement): 31-54.
4. Asare, S. K., and L. S. McDaniel. 1996. The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. The Accounting Review 71 (2): 139-159.
5. Bamber, E. M., and R. J. Ramsay. 1997. An investigation of the effects of specialization in audit workpaper review. Contemporary Accounting Research 14 (3): 501-513.
6. Barnett, T., K. Bass, and G. Brown. 1996. Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer's wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11): 1161-1174.
7. Barrett, M., D. J. Cooper, and K. Jamal. 2005. Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (1): 1-24.
8. Brazel, J. F., C. P. Agoglia, and R. C. Hatfield. 2004. Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors' performance. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 949-966.
9. Burgstahler, D., S. M. Glover, and J. Jiambalvo. 2000. Error projection and uncertainty in the evaluation of aggregate error. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (1): 79-99.
10. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB). 2004. Public Report on Initial Quality Inspections of the Four Largest Accounting Firms. October 6. Toronto, CA: CPAB. Available at: http://www.cpabccrc.ca/EN/content/1st-Public- Report-OCt-6-2004.pdf.
11. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB). 2005. Second Public Report on Quality Inspections of Public Accounting Firms. August 18. Toronto, CA: CPAB. Available at: http://www.cpab-ccrc.ca/EN/content/2nd-Public-Report-Aug-18-2005- eng.pdf.
12. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB). 2012. Meeting the Challenge "A Call to Action" Annual Report 2011. Toronto, CA: CPAB. Available at http://www.cpab-ccrc.ca/EN/content/2011Public-Report-EN.pdf.
13. Choi, J.-H., F. Kim, J.-B. Kim, and Y. S. Zang. 2010. Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (1): 73-97.
14. Clement, R. W., and J. Krueger. 2000. The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology 39 (2): 279-299.
15. Coram, P., J. Ng, and D. R. Woodliff. 2004. The effect of risk of misstatement on the propensity to commit reduced audit quality acts under time budget pressure. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2): 159-167.
16. Coram, P., J. Ng, and D. R. Woodliff. 2008. The moral intensity of reduced audit quality acts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (1): 127-149.
17. Covaleski, M. A., M. W. Dirsmith, J. B. Heian, and S. Samuel. 1998. The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (2): 293-328.
18. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183- 199.
19. Dirsmith, W., and M. A. Covaleski. 1985. Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10 (2): 149-170.
20. Donnelly, D. P., J. J. Quirin, and D. O'Bryan. 2003. Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: An explanatory model using auditors' personal characteristics. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15 (1): 87-110.
21. Edmondson, A. C. 1996. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 32 (1): 5-28.
22. Epps, K. K., and W. F. Messier Jr. 2007. Engagement quality reviews: A comparison of audit firm practices. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (2): 167-181.
23. Ettredge, M., C. Li, and E. Emeigh. 2011. Fee Pressure and Audit Quality. Working paper, The University of Kansas. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.1903860.
24. Ferguson, A., J. Francis, and D. Stokes. 2003. The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 429-448.
25. Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2011. Audit Inspection Unit Annual Report 2010/11. London, U.K.: FRC. Available at: http://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/ Publications/AIU/AIU-2010-11-Annual-Report.Aspx.
26. Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2012. Audit Quality Inspections Annual Report 2011/12. London, U.K.: FRC. Available at: http://www.frc.org.uk/Our- Work/Publications/AIU/Audit-Quality-Inspections-Annual-Report-2011-12.aspx.
27. Francis, J., L. E. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (2): 17-34.
28. Ganushchak, L. Y., and N. O. Schiller. 2006. Effects of time pressure on verbal self-monitoring: An ERP study. Brain Research 1125 (1): 104-115.
29. Ganushchak, L. Y., and N. O. Schiller. 2008a. Motivation and semantic context affect brain errormonitoring activity: An event-related brain potentials study. Neuroimage 39 (1): 395-405.
30. Ganushchak, L. Y., and N. O. Schiller. 2008b. Brain error-monitoring activity is affected by semantic relatedness: An event-related brain potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (5): 927- 940.
31. Gibbins, M., and K. T. Trotman. 2002. Audit review: Managers' interpersonal expectations and conduct of the review. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (3): 411-444.
32. Gibbins, M., S. Salterio, and A. Webb. 2001. Evidence about auditor-client management negotiation concerning client's financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 535-563.
33. Gillingham, D. W., J. Blanco, and J. H. Lewko. 1997. An integrated model of error management. Disaster Prevention and Management 6 (3): 186-190.
34. Gronewold, U., A. Gold, and S. Salterio. 2013. Reporting self-made errors: The impact of organizational error-management climate and error type. Journal of Business Ethics (forthcoming).
35. Gronewold, U., and M. Donle. 2011. Organizational error climate and auditors' predispositions toward handling errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting 23 (2): 69-92.
36. Harding, N., and K. T. Trotman. 1999. Hierarchical differences in audit workpaper review performance. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (4): 671-684.
37. Hermanson, D. R., R. W. Houston, and J. C. Rice. 2007. PCAOB inspections of smaller CPA firms: Initial evidence from inspection reports. Accounting Horizons 21 (2): 137-152.
38. Hermanson, H. M. 1997. The effects of audit structure and experience on auditors' decisions to isolate errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting 9 (Supplement): 76-93.
39. Homsma, G. J., C. Van Dyck, D. De Gilder, P. L. Koopman, and T. Elfring. 2009. Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics. Journal of Business Research 62 (1): 115-122.
40. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2012a. Audit Documentation. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 230. New York, NY: IFAC. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/ A0122012IAASBHandbookISA230.pdf.
41. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2012b. Quality Control for Firms That Perform Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements. International Standard on Quality Control (ISQC) 1. New York, NY: IFAC. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/downloads/a007-2010-iaasb-handbook-isqc- 1.pdf.
42. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2012c. Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor's Report. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 705. New York, NY: IFAC. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/downloads/a037-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa- 705.pdf.
43. Itoh, K., N. Omata, and H. B. Andersen. 2009. A human error taxonomy for analysing healthcare incident reports: Assessing reporting culture and its effects on safety performance. Journal of Risk Research 12 (3-4): 485-511.
44. Kaptein, M. 2011. From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (3): 513-530.
45. Mikulincer, M., and N. Horesh. 1999. Adult attachment style and the perception of others: The role of projective mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (6): 1022-1034.
46. Miller, D. L., and S. Thomas. 2005. The impact of relative position and relational closeness on the reporting of unethical acts. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4): 315-328.
47. Otley, D., and B. Pierce. 1995. The control problem in public accounting firms: An empirical study of the impact of leadership style. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (8): 405-20.
48. Otley, D., and B. Pierce. 1996. The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15 (2): 65-84.
49. Owhoso, V. E., W. F. Messier Jr., and J. G. Lynch Jr. 2002. Error detection by industry-specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (3): 883-900.
50. Palmrose, Z.-V., and S. Scholz. 2004. The circumstances and legal consequences of non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (1): 139-180.
51. Palmrose, Z.-V., V. J. Richardson, and S. Scholz. 2004. Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (1): 59-89.
52. Payne, E. A., R. J. Ramsay, and E. M. Bamber. 2010. The effect of alternative types of review on auditors' procedures and performance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (1): 207-220.
53. Peecher, M., R. Schwartz, and I. Solomon. 2007. It's all about audit quality: Perspectives on strategicsystems auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (6): 463-485.
54. Pershing, J. L. 2003. To snitch or not to snitch? Applying the concept of neutralization techniques to the enforcement of occupational misconduct. Sociological Perspectives 46 (2): 149-178.
55. Peytcheva, M., and P. R. Gillett. 2012. Auditor perceptions of prior involvement and reputation threats as antecedents of quality threatening audit behavior. Managerial Auditing Journal 27 (9): 796-820.
56. Provera, B., A. Montefusco, and A. Canatow. 2008. A "no blame" approach to organizational learning. British Journal of Management 21 (4): 1057-1074.
57. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004a. Report on the 2003 Limited Inspection of Deloitte and Touche LLP. August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003- Deloitte-and-Touche.pdf.
58. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004b. Report on the 2003 Limited Inspection of Ernst & Young LLP. August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003- Ernst-and-Young.pdf.
59. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004c. Report on the 2003 Limited Inspection of KPMG LLP. August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003-KPMG.pdf.
60. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004d. Report on the 2003 Limited Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. August 26. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2003- Pricewaterhouse-Coopers.pdf.
61. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004e. Audit Documentation. Auditing Standard (AS) No. 3. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/Auditing-Standard-3.aspx.
62. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2005. Report on the 2004 Inspection of Ernst & Young LLP. November 17. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2005-Ernst-and- Young.pdf.
63. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2008a. Report on the PCAOB's 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 Inspections of Domestic Annually Inspected Firms. PCAOB Release No. 2008-008. December 5. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/2008-12-05-Release-2008-008.pdf.
64. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2008b. Report on 2007 Inspection of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Includes the Part II quality control criticisms that were originally redacted. May 18. Available at http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Reports/Documents/2008-Deloitte.pdf.
65. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2012. Information for Audit Committees About the PCAOB Inspection Process. Release 2012-003. Washington, DC: PCAOB. Available at http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/ Inspection-Information-for-Audit-Committees.pdf.
66. Rabbitt, P. 1969. Psychological refractory delay and response-stimulus interval duration in serial, choiceresponse tasks. Acta Psychologica 30:195-219.
67. Rabbitt, P. 1990. Age, IQ and awareness, and recall of errors. Ergonomics 33 (10/11): 1291-1305.
68. Ramsay, R. J. 1994. Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper review performance. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (1): 127-135.
69. Rathert, C., and D. R. May. 2007. Health care work environments, employee satisfaction, and patient safety: Care providers' perspectives. Health Care Management Review 31 (1): 2-11.
70. Reason, J. T. 2000. Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal 320 (7237): 768-770.
71. Reynolds, J. K., and J. Francis. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 375-400.
72. Rich, J. S., I. Solomon, and K. T. Trotman. 1997. The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (5): 481-505.
73. Ruvolo, A. P., and L. A. Fabin. 1999. Two of a kind: Perceptions of own and partner's attachment characteristics. Personal Relationships 6 (1): 57-79.
74. Rybowiak, V., H. Garst, M. Frese, and B. Batinic. 1999. Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20 (4): 527-547.
75. Seifert, D. L., J. T. Sweeney, J. Joireman, and J. M. Thornton. 2010. The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (7): 707-717.
76. Smith, E. 1997. Private selves and shared meanings: Or forgive us for our projections as we forgive those who project into us. Psychodynamic Counseling 3 (2): 117-131.
77. Stefaniak, C., and J. C. Robertson. 2010. When auditors err: How mistake significance and superiors' historical reactions influence auditors' likelihood to admit a mistake. International Journal of Auditing 14 (1): 41-55.
78. Tan, H.-T., and K. T. Trotman. 2003. Reviewers' responses to anticipated stylization attempts by preparers of audit workpapers. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 581-604.
79. Tax, S. S., and S. W. Brown. 1998. Recovering and learning from service failure. Sloan Management Review 40 (1): 75-88.
80. Trevino, L. K., and B. Victor. 1992. Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35 (1): 38-64.
81. Tucker, A. L., and A. Edmondson. 2003. Why hospitals don't learn from failures: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review 45 (2): 55-72.
82. Uribe, C. L., S. B. Schweikhart, D. S. Pathak, and G. B. March. 2002. Perceived barriers to medical-error reporting: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Healthcare Management 47 (4): 264-279.
83. Uttl, B. 2005. Measurements of individual differences: Lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychological Science 16 (6): 460-467.
84. Vadera, A. K., R. V. Aguilera, and B. B. Caza. 2009. Making sense of whistle-blowing's antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4): 553-586.
85. Van Dyck, C. 1997. Error climate and management issues: Its links to organizational performance. In Managerial Behavior and Practices: European Research Issues, edited by R. Pepermans, A. Buelens, C. J. Vinkenburg, and P. G. W. Jensen, 107-116. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: Acco.
86. Van Dyck, C. 2009. The tragic 1996 Everest expedition: A tale of error culture. Netherlands Journal of Psychology 65 (1): 22-34.
87. Van Dyck, C., M. Frese, M. Baer, and S. Sonnentag. 2005. Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (6): 1228-1240.
88. Victor, B., L. K. Trevino, and D. L. Shapiro. 1993. Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4): 253-263.
89. Wild, D., and E. H. Bradley. 2005. The gap between nurses and residents in a community hospital's errorreporting system. Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 31 (1): 13-20.
90. Winograd, B. N., J. S. Gerson, and B. L. Berlin. 2000. Audit practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (2): 175-182.
91. Zhao, B., and F. Olivera. 2006. Error reporting in organizations. Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 1012-1030.