Isohydrodynamic behavior in deficit-irrigated Cabernet Sauvignon and Malbec and its relationship between yield and berry composition

Irrigation Science

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 87-97

  Shellie, Krista C ^a   Bowen, Pat ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b SUMMERLAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHOCYANINS; CULTIVATION; FRUITS; IRRIGATION;

CABERNET-SAUVIGNON; CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; IRRIGATION AMOUNTS; LEAF WATER POTENTIAL; PRE-DAWN LEAF WATER POTENTIALS; REGRESSION EQUATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TITRATABLE ACIDITY;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CROP; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FRUIT; LEAF; MATURATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER STRESS;

EID: 84894354596     PISSN: 03427188     EISSN: 14321319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-013-0416-y     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food Agricultural Organization (FAO), Rome.
2. Alsina MM, de Herralde F, Aranda X, Savé R, Biel C (2007) Water relations and vulnerability to embolism are not related: experiments with eight grapevine cultivars. VITIS 46: 1-6.
3. Basile B, Marsal J, Mata M, Vallverdú' X, Bellvert J, Girona J (2011) Phenological sensitivity of Cabernet Sauvignon to water stress: vine physiology and berry composition. Am J Enol Vitic 62: 452-461.
4. Bota J, Flexas J, Medrano H (2001) Genetic variability of photosynthesis and water use in Balearic grapevine cultivars. Ann Appl Biol 138: 353-361.
5. Bowen P, Bogdanoff C, Usher K, Estergaard B, Watson M (2011) Effects of irrigation and crop load on leaf gas exchange and fruit composition in red winegrapes grown on a loamy sand. Am J Enol Vitic 62: 9-22.
6. Chaves MM, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, Costa JM, Santos T, Regalado AP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes CM (2010) Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann Bot 105: 661-676.
7. Cifre J, Bota J, Escalona JM, Medrano H, Flexas J (2005) Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): an open gate to improve water-use efficiency? Agr Ecosyst Environ 106: 159-170.
8. Correia MJ, Pereira JS, Chaves MM, Rodrigues ML, Pacheco CA (1995) ABA xylem concentrations determine maximum daily leaf conductance of field-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant, Cell Environ 18: 511-521.
9. Cramer G, Ergü A et al (2007) Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct Integr Genomics 7: 111-134.
10. 13C) of field-grown grapevines under Mediterranean climate. J Exp Bot 56: 2163-2172.
11. Domec J, Johnson DM (2013) Does homeostasis or disturbance of homeostasis in minimum leaf water potential explain the isohydric versus anisohydric behavior of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars? Tree Physiol 32: 245-248.
12. Franks PJ, Drake PL, Froend RH (2007) Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance. Plant, Cell Environ 30: 19-30.
13. Hochberg U, Degu A, Fait A, Rachmilevitch S (2013) Near isohydric grapevine cultivar displays higher photosynthetic efficiency and photorespiration rates under drought stress as compared with near anisohydric grapevine cultivar. Physiol Plantarum 147: 443-452.
14. Iland P, Bruer N, Edwards G, Weeks S, Wilkes S (2004) Chemical analysis of grapes and wine: techniques and concepts. Patrick Iland Wine Promotions PTY LTD, Campbelltown, pp 44-48.
15. Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2006) Vine and soil-based measures of water status in a Tempranillo vineyard. VITIS 45: 157-163.
16. Keller M, Smithyman RP, Mills LJ (2008) Interactive effects of deficit irrigation and crop load on Cabernet Sauvignon in an arid climate. Am J Enol Vitic 59: 221-234.
17. Lawlor DW, Cornic G (2002) Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell Environ 25: 275-294.
18. Lovisolo C, Perrone I, Carra A, Ferrandino A, Flexas J, Medrano H, Schubert A (2010) Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update. Funct Plant Biol 105: 661-676.
19. Medrano H, Escalona JM, Cifre J, Bota J, Flexas J (2003) A ten-year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Func Plant Bio 30: 607-619.
20. Roby G, Matthews MA (2004) Relative proportions of seed, skin and flesh, in ripe berries from Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines grown in a vineyard either well irrigated or under water deficit. Aust J Grape Wine R 10: 74-82.
21. Roby G, Harbertson JF, Adams DA, Matthews MA (2004) Berry size and vine water deficits as factors in winegrape composition: anthocyanins and tannins. Aust J Grape Wine R 10: 100-107.
22. Romero P, Fernández-Fernández JI, Martinez-Cutillas A (2010) Physiological thresholds for efficient regulated deficit-irrigation management in winegrapes grown under semiarid conditions. Am J Enol Vitic 61: 300-312.
23. Romero P, Gil-Muñoz R, del Amor FM, Valdés E, Fernández JI, Martinez-Cutillas A (2013) Regulated deficit irrigation based upon optimum water status improves phenolic composition in Monastrell grapes and wines. Agric Water Manag 121: 85-101.
24. Sadras VO, Stevens RM, Pech JM, Taylor EJ, Nicholas PR, McCarthy MG (2007) Quantifying phenotypic plasticity of berry traits using an allometric-type approach: a case study on anthocyanins and sugars in berries of Cabernet Sauvignon. Aust J Grape Wine R 13: 72-80.
25. Schultz HR (2003) Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behavior of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1393-1405.
26. Shellie K (2006) Vine and berry response of Merlot (Vitis vinifera L.) to differential water stress. Am J Enol Vitic 57: 514-518.
27. Shellie KC, King B (2013) Kaolin-based foliar reflectant and water deficit influence Malbec leaf and berry temperature, pigments, and photosynthesis. Am J Enol Vitic. doi: 10. 5344/ajev. 2012. 12115.
28. Sivilotti P, Bonetto C, Paladin M, Peterlunger E (2005) Effect of soil moisture availability on Merlot: from leaf water potential to grape composition. Am J Enol Vitic 56: 9-18.
29. Turner NC (1988) Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrigation Sci 9: 289-308.
30. US Department of Agriculture (1972) Soil survey of Canyon Area, Idaho. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
31. Vandeleur RK, Mayo G, Shelden MC, Gilliham M, Kaiser BN, Tyerman SS (2009) The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol 149: 445-460.
32. c) on leaf gas exchange of Thompson Seedless grapevines. Aust J Grape Wine R 18: 100-108.
33. Williams LE, Araujo FU (2002) Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127: 448-454.
34. Williams LE, Baeza P (2007) Relationships among ambient temperature and vapor pressure deficit and leaf and stem water potentials of fully irrigated, field-grown grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 58: 173-181.
35. Williams LE, Trout TJ (2005) Relationships among vine-and soil-based measures of water status in a Thompson seedless vineyard in response to high-frequency drip irrigation. Am J Enol Vitic 56: 357-366.
36. Williams LE, Grimes DW, Phene CJ (2010) The effects of applied water at various fractions of measured evapotranspiration on water relations and vegetative growth of Thompson Seedless grapevines. Irrig Sci 28: 221-232.
37. Williams LE, Baeza P, Vaughn P (2012) Midday measurements of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance are highly correlated with daily water use of Thompson Seedless grapevines. Irrig Sci 30: 201-212.
38. Zhang Y, Oren R, Kang S (2013) Spatiotemporal variation of crown-scale stomatal conductance in an arid Vitis vinifera L. Merlot vineyard: direct effects of hydraulic properties and indirect effects of canopy leaf area. Tree Physiol 32: 262-279.