Relationships among ambient temperature and vapor pressure deficit and leaf and stem water potentials of fully irrigated, field-grown grapevines

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-181

  Williams, Larry E ^a   Baeza, Pilar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Grapevines; Leaf water potential; Nonstressed baseline; Stem water potential; Vapor pressure deficit

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 34447545527     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cifre, J., J. Bota, J.M. Secalona, H. Medrano, and J. Flexas. 2005. Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). An open gate to improve water-use efficiency. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 106:159-170.
2. Correia, J.J., J.S. Pereira, M.M. Chaves, M.L. Rodriques, and C.A. Pacheco. 1995. ABA xylem concentrations determine maximum daily leaf conductance of field-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant Cell Environ. 18:511-521.
3. Cuevas, E., P. Baeza, and J.R. Lissarrague. 2006. Variation in stomatal behaviour and gas exchange between mid-morning and mid-afternoon of north-south oriented grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo) at different levels of soil water availability. Sci. Hortic. 108:173-180.
4. De Souza, C.R., J.P. Maroco, T.P. dos Santos, M.L. Rodrigues, C.M. Lopes, J.S. Pereira, and M.M. Chaves. 2003. Partial rootzone drying: Regulation of stomatal aperature and carbon assimilation in field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera cv. Moscatel). Funct. Plant Biol. 30:653-662.
5. Grimes, D.W., and L.E. Williams. 1990. Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines. Crop Sci. 30:255-260.
6. Grimes, D.W., H. Yamada, and S.W. Hughes. 1987. Climate-normalized cotton leaf water potentials for irrigation scheduling. Agric. Water Man. 12:293-304.
7. Gruber, B.R, and H.R. Schultz. 2005. Coupling of plant to soil water status at different vineyard sites. Acta Hortic. 689:381-389.
8. Idso, S.B., R.D. Jackson, P.R. Pinter, R.J. Reginato, and J.L. Hatfield. 1981. Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability. Agric. Meteorol. 24:45-55.
9. Jackson, R.D., W.P. Kustas, and B.J. Choudbury. 1988. A reexamination of the crop water stress index. Irr. Sci. 9:309-317.
10. Jacobs, C.M.J., B.J.J.M. van den Hurk, and H.A.R. de Bruin. 1996. Stomatal behaviours and photosynthetic rate of unstressed grapevines in semi-arid conditions. Agric. For. Meteor. 80:111-134.
11. McCutchan, H., and K.A. Shackel. 1992. Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117:607-611.
12. Medrano, H., J.M. Escalona, J. Cifre, J. Bota, and J. Flexas. 2003. A ten-year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: Effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 30:607-619.
13. Schultz, H.R. 1996. Water relations and photosynthetic responses of two grapevine cultivar of different geographical origin during water stress. Acta Hortic. 427:251-266.
14. Schultz, H.R. 2003. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ. 26:1393-1405.
15. Shackel, K.A., et al. 1997. Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. HortTechnology 7:23-29.
16. Shackel, K., S. Gurusinghe, D. Kester, and W. Micke. 1998. Water stress responses of almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) Webb.] trees under field conditions. Acta Hortic. 470:309-314.
17. Shackel, K.A., B. Lampinen, S. Southwick, W. Olson, S. Sibbett, W. Kreger, J. Yeager, and D. Boldhamer. 2000. Deficit irrigation in prunes: Maintaining productivity with less water. HortScience 35:1063-1066.
18. Smart, R.E. 1974. Aspects of water relations of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 25:84-91.
19. Smart, R.E., and H.D. Barrs. 1973. The effect of environment and irrigation interval on leaf water potential of four horticultural species. Agric. Meteor. 12:337-346.
20. Stevens, R.M., G. Harvey, and D. Aspinall. 1995. Grapevine growth of shoots and fruit linearly correlated with water stress indices based on root-weighted soil matric potential. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 1:58-66.
21. Synder, R.L., and W.O. Pruitt. 1992. Evapotranspiration data management in California. In Proceedings of the ASCE National Conference, Water Forum 1992, pp. 128-133. Am. Society of Civil Engineers, Baltimore.
22. Tardieu, F., and T. Simonneau. 1998. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: Modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot. 49:419-432.
23. Turner, N.C. 1991. Measurement and influence of environmental and plant factors on stomata conductance in the field. Agric. For. Meteor. 54:137-154.
24. van den Honert, T.H. 1948. Water transport in plants as a catenary process. Disc. Faraday Soc. 3:146-153.
25. van Zyl, J.L. 1987. Diurnal variation in grapevine water stress as a function of changing soil water status and meteorological conditions. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 8:45-52.
26. Williams, L.E., and F. Araujo. 2002. Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera L. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127:448-454.
27. 3) and trunk girdling: Practices to increase berry size. Agric. For. Meteor. 129:85-94.
28. Williams, L.E., and J.E. Ayars. 2005b. Grapevine water use and the crop coefficient are linear functions of the shaded area measured beneath the canopy. Agric. For. Meteor. 132:201-211.
29. Williams, L.E., and T.J. Trout. 2005. Relationships among vine- and soil-based measures of water status in a Thompson Seedless vineyard in response to high-frequency drip irrigation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:357-366.
30. Williams, L.E., N.K. Dokoozlian, and R.L. Wample. 1994. Grape. In Handbook of Environmental Physiology of Fruit Crops. Vol. 1. Temperate Crops. B. Shaffer and P.C. Anderson (Eds.), pp. 83-133. CRC Press, Orlando, Florida.
31. Williams, L.E., C.J. Phene, D.W. Grimes, and T.J. Trout. 2003a. Water use of young Thompson Seedless grapevines in California. Irrig. Sci. 22:1-9.
32. Williams, L.E., C.J. Phene, D.W. Grimes, and T.J. Trout. 2003b. Water use of mature Thompson Seedless grapevines in California. Irrig. Sci. 22:11-18.
33. Winkel, T., and S. Rambal. 1990. Stomatal conductance of some grapevines growing in the field under a Mediterranean environment. Agric. For. Meteor. 51:107-121.