Statistical formats to optimize evidence-based decision making: A behavioral approach

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 790-794

  Arribas, Iván ^a   Comeig, Irene ^a   Urbano, Amparo ^a   Vila, José ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Economic experiments; Judgment under uncertainty; Orthogonal design; Probability judgment; Statistical formats

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894280224     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.046     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arribas, I., Comeig, I., Urbano, A. and Vila, J. (2013). Orthogonal design in experimental economics, MIMEO.
2. Brase G.L. Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2002, 15:381-401.
3. Brase G.L. Omissions, conflations, and false dichotomies: Conceptual and empirical problems with the Barbey & Sloman account. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:258-259.
4. Butterworth B. Why frequencies are natural. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:259-260.
5. Ghosh A.K., Ghosh K. Translating evidence-based information into effective risk communication: Current challenges and opportunities. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 2005, 145(4):171-180.
6. Gigerenzer G., Edwards A. Simple tools for understanding risks: From innumeracy to insights. British Medical Journal 2003, 327:741-744.
7. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instructions: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 1995, 102:684-740.
8. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: a reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999). Psychological Review 1999, 106:425-430.
9. Girotto V., Gonzalez M. How to elicit sound probabilistic reasoning: Beyond word problems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:268.
10. Hoffrage U., Lindsey S., Hertwig R., Gigerenzer G. Communicating statistical information. Science 2000, 290:2261-2262.
11. Holt C.A., Laury S.K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review 2002, 92(5):1644-1655.
12. Kauffmann C., Weber M., Haisley E. The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one's investment risk appetite. Management Science 2013, 59(2):323-340.
13. Macchi L. Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000, 82:217-236.
14. Macchi L., Bagassi L. The underinformative formulation of conditional probability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:274-275.
15. Macchi L., Mosconi G. Computational features versus frequentist phrasing in the base-rate fallacy. Swiss Journal of Psychology 1998, 57:79-85.
16. Ni Y., Zhou Y. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 2005, 40:27-52.
17. Osman M., Shanks D.R. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making. Acta Psychologica 2005, 120:93-112.
18. Soyer E., Hogarth R.M. Econometrics and decision making: Effects of presentation mode. WP 1204 2010, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.