Cellulose hydrolysis and binding with Trichoderma reesei Cel5A and Cel7A and their core domains in ionic liquid solutions

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 726-733

  Wahlström, Ronny ^a   Rahikainen, Jenni ^a   Kruus, Kristiina ^a   Suurnäkki, Anna ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate binding module; Cellulase; Hydrolysis; Ionic liquid; Protein carbohydrate interaction; Substrate binding

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; EXPERIMENTS; HYDROLYSIS; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATES;

1-ETHYL-3-METHYLIMIDAZOLIUM ACETATES; CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING MODULES; CELLOBIOHYDROLASE CEL7A; CELLULASE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; PROTEIN-CARBOHYDRATE INTERACTIONS; SUBSTRATE BINDING;

IONIC LIQUIDS;

1 ETHYL 3 METHYLIMIDAZOLIUM ACETATE; 1,3 DIMETHYLIMIDAZOLIUM DIMETHYLPHOSPHATE; CELLULASE; IONIC LIQUID; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; TRICHODERMA REESEI CELLOBIOHYDROLASE CEL7A; TRICHODERMA REESEI ENDOGLUCANASE CEL5A; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; ENZYME BINDING; HYDROLYSIS; HYPOCREA JECORINA; LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING; NONHUMAN;

CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING MODULE; CELLULASE; HYDROLYSIS; IONIC LIQUID; PROTEIN-CARBOHYDRATE INTERACTION; SUBSTRATE BINDING;

CELLULASES; CELLULOSE; HYDROLYSIS; IONIC LIQUIDS; PROTEIN BINDING; TRICHODERMA;

EID: 84894238923     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25144     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arantes V, Saddler JN. 2010. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:1-11.
2. Bhat MK, Bhat S. 1997. Cellulose degrading enzymes and their potential industrial applications. Biotechnol Adv 15:583-620.
3. Bokinsky G, Peralta-Yahya PP, George A, Holmes BM, Steen EJ, Dietrich J, Soon Lee T, Tullman-Ercek D, Voigt CA, Simmons BA, Keasling JD. 2011. Synthesis of three advanced biofuels from ionic liquid-pretreated switchgrass using engineered Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19949-19954.
4. Carrard G, Koivula A, Söderlund H, Béguin P. 2000. Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10342-10347.
5. Carrard G, Linder M. 1999. Widely different off rates of two closely related cellulose-binding domains from Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 262:637-643.
6. Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN. 2007. Substrate pretreatment: The key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lingocellulosics? Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:67-93.
7. Dadi AP, Schall CA, Varanasi S. 2007. Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137:407-421.
8. Dadi AP, Varanasi S, Schall CA. 2006. Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step. Biotechnol Bioeng 95:904-910.
9. Datta S, Holmes B, Park JI, Chen Z, Dibble DC, Hadi M, Blanch HW, Simmons BA, Sapra R. 2010. Ionic liquid tolerant hyperthermophilic cellulases for biomass pretreatment and hydrolysis. Green Chem 12:338-345.
10. Din N, Damude HG, Gilkes NR, Miller RC, Jr. Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG. 1994. C1-Cx revisited: Intramolecular synergism in a cellulase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:11383-11387.
11. Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Pettersson G, Knowles J, Teeri T, Jones T. 1994. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 265:524-528.
12. Engel P, Krull S, Seiferheld B, Spiess AC. 2012. Rational approach to optimize cellulase mixtures for hydrolysis of regenerated cellulose containing residual ionic liquid. Bioresour Technol 115:27-34.
13. Engel P, Mladenov R, Wulfhorst H, Jäger G, Spiess AC. 2010. Point by point analysis: how ionic liquid affects the enzymatic hydrolysis of native and modified cellulose. Green Chem 12:1959-1966.
14. Fox JM, Jess P, Jambusaria RB, Moo GM, Liphardt J, Clark DS, Blanch HW. 2013. A single-molecule analysis reveals morphological targets for cellulase synergy. Nat Chem Biol 9:356-361.
15. Ghose TK. 1987. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257-268.
16. Hofvendahl K, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2000. Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:87-107.
17. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttilä M, Samejima M. 2009. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284:36186-36190.
18. Jalak J, Väljamäe P. 2010. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:871-883.
19. Kaar JL, Jesionowski AM, Berberich JA, Moulton R, Russell AJ. 2003. Impact of ionic liquid physical properties on lipase activity and stability. J Am Chem Soc 125:4125-4131.
20. Kamiya N, Matsushita Y, Hanaki M, Nakashima K, Narita M, Goto M, Takahashi H. 2008. Enzymatic in situ saccharification of cellulose in aqueous-ionic liquid media. Biotechnol Lett 30:1037-1040.
21. Kazmin D, Edwards RA, Turner RJ, Larson E, Starkey J. 2002. Visualization of proteins in acrylamide gels using ultraviolet illumination. Anal Biochem 301:91-96.
22. Kilpeläinen I, Xie H, King A, Granström M, Heikkinen S, Argyropoulos DS. 2007. Dissolution of wood in ionic liquids. J Agric Food Chem 55:9142-9148.
23. Kotiranta P, Karlsson J, Siika-aho M, Medve J, Viikari L, Tjerneld F, Tenkanen M. 1999. Adsorption and activity of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I, endoglucanase II, and the corresponding core proteins on steam pretreated willow. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 81:81-90.
24. Kraulis PJ, Clore GM, Nilges M, Jones TA, Pettersson G, Knowles J, Gronenborn AM. 1989. Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 28:7241-7257.
25. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685.
26. Li L, Xie J, Yu S, Su Z, Liu S, Liu F, Xie C, Zhang B. 2012. Novel compatible system of [C2OHmim][OAc]-cellulases for the in situ hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. RSC Adv 2:11712-11718.
27. Linder M, Lindeberg G, Reinikainen T, Teeri TT, Pettersson G. 1995a. The difference in affinity between two fungal cellulose-binding domains is dominated by a single amino acid substitution. FEBS Lett 372:96-98.
28. Linder M, Teeri TT. 1996. The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:12251-12255.
29. Linder M, Mattinen M, Kontteli M, Lindeberg G, Ståhlberg J, Drakenberg T, Reinikainen T, Pettersson G, Annila A. 1995b. Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Sci 4:1056-1064.
30. Means GE, Feeney RE. 1968. Reductive alkylation of amino groups in proteins. Biochemistry 7:2192-2201.
31. Palonen H, Tjerneld F, Zacchi G, Tenkanen M. 2004. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. J Biotechnol 107:65-72.
32. Palonen H, Tenkanen M, Linder M. 1999. Dynamic Interaction of trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases Cel6A and Cel7A and cellulose at equilibrium and during hydrolysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5229-5233.
33. Park JI, Steen EJ, Burd H, Evans SS, Redding-Johnson AM, Batth T, Benke PI, D'haeseleer P, Sun N, Sale KL, Keasling JD, Lee TS, Petzold CJ, Mukhopadhyay A, Singer SW, Simmons BA, Gladden JM. 2012. A thermophilic ionic liquid-tolerant cellulase cocktail for the production of cellulosic biofuels. PLoS ONE 7:e37010.
34. Pottkämper J, Barthen P, Ilmberger N, Schwaneberg U, Schenk A, Schulte M, Ignatiev N, Streit WR. 2009. Applying metagenomics for the identification of bacterial cellulases that are stable in ionic liquids. Green Chem 11:957-965.
35. Rahikainen JL, Martin-Sampedro R, Heikkinen H, Rovio S, Marjamaa K, Tamminen T, Rojas OJ, Kruus K. 2013. Inhibitory effect of lignin during cellulose bioconversion: The effect of lignin chemistry on non-productive enzyme adsorption. Bioresour Technol 133:270-278.
36. Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles JKC, Jones TA. 1990. Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science 249:380-386.
37. Sandoval M, Civera C, Treviño J, Ferreras E, Cortés A, Vaultier M, Berenguer J, Lozano P, Hernáiz MJ. 2012. Efficient and selective enzymatic synthesis of N-acetyl-lactosamine in ionic liquid: A rational explanation. RSC Adv 2:6306-6314.
38. Sheldon RA, Lau RM, Sorgedrager MJ, van Rantwijk F, Seddon KR. 2002. Biocatalysis in ionic liquids. Green Chem 4:147-151.
39. Shill K, Padmanabhan S, Xin Q, Prausnitz JM, Clark DS, Blanch HW. 2011. Ionic liquid pretreatment of cellulosic biomass: Enzymatic hydrolysis and ionic liquid recycle. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:511-520.
40. Ståhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G. 1991. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the two-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase I. Nat Biotechnol 9:286-290.
41. Sumner JB. 1924. The estimation of sugar in diabetic urine, using dinitrosalicylic acid. J Biol Chem 62:287-290.
42. Sun N, Rodriguez H, Rahman M, Rogers RD. 2011. Where are ionic liquid strategies most suited in the pursuit of chemicals and energy from lignocellulosic biomass? Chem Commun 47:1405-1421.
43. Suurnäkki A, Tenkanen M, Siika-aho M, Niku-paavola M-L, Viikari L, Buchert J. 2000. Trichoderma reesei cellulases and their core domains in the hydrolysis and modification of chemical pulp. Cellulose 7:189-209.
44. Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. 2002. Dissolution of cellose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 124:4974-4975.
45. Teeri TT. 1997. Crystalline cellulose degradation: New insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol 15:160-167.
46. Tomme P, van Tilbeurgh H, Petterson G, van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Clayessens M. 1988. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Eur J Biochem 170:575-581.
47. Turner MB, Spear SK, Huddleston JG, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. 2003. Ionic liquid salt-induced inactivation and unfolding of cellulase from Trichoderma reesei. Green Chem 5:443.
48. van Tilbeurgh H, Loontiens FG, De Bruyne CK, Claeyssens M. 1988. Fluorogenic and chromogenic glycosides as substrates and ligands of carbohydrases. Methods Enzymol 160:45-459.
49. van Tilbeurgh H, Tomme P, Claeyssens M, Bhikhabhai R, Pettersson G. 1986. Limited proteolysis of the cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei: Separation of functional domains. FEBS Lett 204:223-227.
50. Várnai A, Siika-aho M, Viikari L. 2013. Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) revisited: Reduced amount of water counterbalances the need for CBMs. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:30.
51. Wahlström R, Rovio S, Suurnäkki A. 2012. Partial enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose in ionic liquids by Trichoderma reesei endoglucanases. RSC Adv 2:4472-4480.