Mice divergently selected for high and low basal metabolic rates evolved different cell size and organ mass

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 478-487

  Maciak, S ^a   Bonda Ostaszewska, E ^a   Czarnoleski, M ^b   Konarzewski, M ^a   Kozlowski, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIALYSTOK   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cell size evolution; Karyoplasmic ratio; Metabolic rate; Mice; Selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BASAL METABOLIC RATE; CELL SIZE; MALE; MOUSE; ORGAN SIZE;

ANIMALS; BASAL METABOLISM; CELL SIZE; MALE; MICE; ORGAN SIZE;

EID: 84894235522     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12306     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Brown, J.H., Gillooly, J.F., Allen, A.P., Savage, V.M. & West, G.B. 2004. Toward metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85: 1771-1789.
2. Brzek, P., Bielawska, K., Ksiazek, A. & Konarzewski, M. 2007. Anatomic and molecular correlates of divergent selection for basal metabolic rate in laboratory mice. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 80: 401-499.
3. Buttgereit, F. & Brand, M.D. 1995. A hierarchy of ATP-consuming processes in mammalian cells. Biochem. J. 312: 163-167.
4. Carvalhal, A.V., Marcelino, I. & Carrondo, M.J.T. 2003. Metabolic changes during cell growth inhibition by p27 overexpression. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63: 164-173.
5. Cavalier-Smith, T. 2005. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann. Bot. 95: 147-175.
6. Chown, S.L., Marais, E., Terblanche, J.S., Klok, C.J., Lighton, J.R.B. & Blackburn, T.M. 2007. Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model. Funct. Ecol. 21: 282-290.
7. Cohen-Fix, O. 2010. Cell biology: import and nuclear size. Nature 468: 513-516.
8. Czarnoleski, M., Kozlowski, J., Dumiot, G., Bonnet, J.-C., Mallard, J. & Dupont-Nivet, M. 2008. Scaling of metabolism in Helix aspersa snails: changes through ontogeny and response to selection for increased size. J. Exp. Biol. 211: 391-399.
9. Ellis, R.J. 2001. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26: 597-604.
10. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Essex.
11. Falconer, D.S., Gauld, I.K. & Roberts, R.C. 1978. Cell numbers and cell sizes in organs of mice selected for large and small body size. Genet. Res. 31: 287-301.
12. Gebczyński, A. & Konarzewski, M. 2009. Metabolic correlates of selection on aerobic capacity in laboratory mice: a test of the model for the evolution of endothermy. J. Exp. Biol. 212: 2872-2878.
13. Gebczyński, A. & Konarzewski, M. 2011. Effects of oxygen availability on maximum aerobic performance in Mus musculus selected for basal metabolic rate or aerobic capacity. J. Exp. Biol. 214: 1714-1720.
14. Glazier, D.S. 2005. Beyond the '3/4-Power Law': variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biol. Rev. 80: 611-662.
15. Glazier, D.S. 2010. A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants. Biol. Rev. 85: 111-138.
16. Gregory, T.R. 2001. The bigger the c-value, the larger the cell: genome size and red blood cell size in vertebrates. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 27: 830-843.
17. Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Henderson, N.D. 1997. Spurious associations in unreplicated selected lines. Behav. Genet. 27: 145-154.
19. Heusner, A.A. 1982. Energy metabolism and body size. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? Respir. Physiol. 48: 1-12.
20. Hochachka, P.W., Darveau, C.A., Andrews, R.D. & Suarez, R.K. 2003. Allometric cascade: a model for resolving body mass effects on metabolism. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 134: 675-691.
21. Isaac, N.J.B. & Carbone, C. 2010. Why are metabolic scaling exponents so controversial? Quantifying variance and testing hypotheses. Ecol. Lett. 13: 728-735.
22. Jones, D.L., Nielsen, M.K. & Britton, R.A. 1992. Genetic variation in liver mass, body mass, and liver: body mass in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 70: 2999-3006.
23. Jorgensen, P. & Tyers, M. 2004. How cells coordinate growth and division. Curr. Biol. 14: 1014-1027.
24. Kleiber, M. 1947. Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol. Rev. 27: 511-541.
25. Koch, L.G. & Britton, S.L. 2001. Artificial selection for intrinsic aerobic endurance running capacity in rats. Physiol. Genomics 5: 45-52.
26. Konarzewski, M. & Ksiazek, A. 2013. Determinants of intra-specific variation in basal metabolic rate. J. Comp. Physiol. 183: 27-41.
27. Konarzewski, M., Ksiazek, A. & Lapo, I.B. 2005. Artificial selection on metabolic rates and related traits in rodents. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 416-425.
28. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. 2010. Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation, pp. 532. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Kozlowski, J., Konarzewski, M. & Gawelczyk, A.T. 2003. Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. PNAS 24: 14080-14085.
30. Kozlowski, J., Czarnoleski, M., Francois-Krassowska, A., Maciak, S. & Pis, T. 2010. Cell size is positively correlated between different tissues in passerine birds and amphibians, but not necessarily in mammals. Biol. Lett. 6: 792-796.
31. Ksiazek, A., Konarzewski, M. & Lapo, I.B. 2004. Anatomic and energetic correlates of divergent selection for basal metabolic rate in laboratory mice. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 77: 890-899.
32. Maciak, S., Janko, K., Kotusz, J., Choleva, L., Boroń, A., Juchno, D. et al. 2011. Standard Metabolic Rate (SMR) is inversely related to erythrocyte and genome size in allopolyploid fish of the Cobitis taenia hybrid complex. Funct. Ecol. 25: 1072-1078.
33. Makarieva, A.M., Gorshkov, V.G., Li, B.-L., Chown, S.L., Reich, P.B. & Gavrilov, V.M. 2008. Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life's major domains: evidence for life's metabolic optimum. PNAS 105: 16994-16999.
34. Marguerat, S. & Bahler, J. 2012. Coordinating genome expression with cell size. Trends Genet. 28: 560-565.
35. McNab, B.K. 2008. An analysis of the factors that influence the level and scaling of mammalian BMR. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 151: 5-28.
36. Neumann, F.R. & Nurse, P. 2007. Nuclear size control in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 179: 593-600.
37. Rolfe, D.F. & Brown, G.C. 1997. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiol. Rev. 77: 731-758.
38. Schlager, G. 1968. Kidney weight in mice: strain differences and genetic determination. J. Hered. 59: 171-174.
39. Schmidt, E.E. & Schibler, U. 1995. Cell size regulation, a mechanism controls cellular RNA accumulation: consequences on regulation of the ubiquitous transcription factors Oct1 and NF-Y, and the liver-enriched transcription factor DBP. J. Cell Biol. 128: 467-483.
40. Snyder, G.K. & Sheafor, B.A. 1999. Red blood cells: centerpiece in the evolution of the vertebrate circulatory system. Am. Zool. 39: 189-198.
41. Starostová, Z., Konarzewski, M., Kozlowski, J. & Kratochvíl, L. 2013. Ontogeny of metabolic rate and red blood cell size in Eyelid geckos: species follow different paths. PLoS ONE 8: e64715.
42. Stevenson, R.D., Hill, M.F. & Bryant, P.J. 1995. Organ and cell allometry in Hawaiian Drosophila: how to make a big fly. Proc. Biol. Sci. 259: 105-110.
43. Swallow, J.G., Hayes, J.P., Koteja, P. & Garland, T. Jr 2009. Selection experiments and experimental evolution of performance and physiology. In: Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments (T. Garland Jr, M.R. Rose, eds), pp. 301-351. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
44. Webster, M., Witkin, K.L. & Cohen-Fix, O. 2009. Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J. Cell Sci. 122: 1477-1486.
45. Wells, W.A. 2002. Does size matter? J. Cell Biol. 158: 1156-1159.
46. Wheatley, D.N. 2007. Convergence of metabolic rate of cultured cells from animals of different sizes. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 292: R2113-R2114.
47. White, C.R., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T.M. 2007. Allometric exponents do not support a universal metabolic allometry. Ecology 88: 315-323.
48. White, C.R., Kearney, M.R., Matthews, P.G.D., Kooijman, S.A.L.M. & Marshall, D.J. 2011. A manipulative test of competing theories for metabolic scaling. Am. Nat. 178: 746-754.
49. Wislöff, U., Najjar, S.M., Ellingsen, R., Haram, P.M., Swoap, S., Al-Share, Q. et al. 2005. Cardiovascular risk factors emerge after artificial selection for low aerobic capacity. Science 307: 418-420.
50. 2 and evaporative water loss with a flow through mask. J. Appl. Physiol. 42: 120-123.
51. Zimmerman, S.B. 1993. Macromolecular crowding effects on macromolecular interactions: some implications for genome structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1216: 175-185.