Scaling of metabolism in Helix aspersa snails: Changes through ontogeny and response to selection for increased size

Journal of Experimental Biology

Volumn 211, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 391-399

  Czarnołȩski, Marcin ^a   Kozłowski, Jan ^a   Dumiot, Guillaume ^b   Bonnet, Jean Claude ^b   Mallard, Jacques ^c   Dupont Nivet, Mathilde ^b  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

3 4 power law; Allometry; Bertalanffy's theory; Bioenergetics; Body size; Cell size; Cost of growth; Experimental evolution; Food consumption; Growth efficiency; Growth rate; Life history; Metabolic theory; Metabolism

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC SELECTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HELIX (SNAIL); HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; ORGAN SIZE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL RATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HELIX (SNAILS); LINEAR MODELS; ORGAN SIZE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SURVIVAL RATE;

GASTROPODA; HELIX ASPERSA;

EID: 40449101596     PISSN: 00220949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.013169     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Angilletta, M. J., Jr and Dunham, A. E. (2003). The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am. Nat. 162, 332-342.
2. Atchley, W. R., Xu, S. and Cowley, D. E. (1997). Altering developmental trajectories in mice by restricted index selection. Genetics 146, 629-640.
3. Atchley, W. R., Wei, R. and Crenshaw, P. (2000). Cellular consequences in the brain and liver of age-specific selection for rate of development in mice. Genetics 155, 1347-1357.
4. Baker, G. M. (2001). The Biology of Terrestrial Molluscs. New York: CABI Publishing.
5. Bayne, B. L. (1999). Physiological components of growth differences between individual oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and a comparison with Saccostrea commercialis. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 72, 705-713.
6. Bonnet, J. C., Aupinel, P. and Vrillon, J. L. (1990). L'escargot Helix aspersa: biologie, élevage. Paris: INRA.
7. Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold.
8. Brown, J. H., Enquist, B. J. and West, G. B. (1997). Allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 278, 373.
9. Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Van Savage, M. and West, G. B. (2004). Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1171-1789.
10. Calboli, F. C. F., Gilchrist, G. W. and Partridge, L. (2003). Different cell size and cell number contribution in two newly established and one ancient body size cline of Drosophila subobscura. Evolution 57, 566-573.
11. Chown, S. L., Marais, E., Terblanche, J. S., Klok, C. J., Lighton, J. R. B. and Blackburn, T. M. (2007). Scaling of insect metabolic rate is inconsistent with the nutrient supply network model. Funct. Ecol. 2, 282-290.
12. Czarnołȩski, M. and Kozłowski, J. (1998). Do Bertalanffy's growth curves result from optimal resource allocation? Ecol. Lett. 1, 5-7.
13. Czarnołȩski, M., Kozłowski, J., Stańczykowska, A. and Lewandowski, K. (2003). Optimal resource allocation explains growth curve diversity in zebra mussels. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 571-587.
14. Czarnołȩski, M., Kozłowski, J., Lewandowski, K., Mikołajczyk, M., Müller, T. and Stańczykowska, A. (2005). Optimal resource allocation explains changes of the zebra mussel growth pattern through time. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7, 821-835.
15. Czarnołȩski, M., Kozłowski, J., Kubajak, P., Lewandowski, K., Müller, T., Stańczykowska, A. and Surówka, K. (2006). Cross-habitat differences in crush resistance and growth pattern of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): effects of calcium availability and predator pressure. Arch. Hydrobiol. 265, 191-208.
16. Davison, J. (1955). Body weight, cell surface and metabolic rate in anuran Amphibia. Biol. Bull. 109, 407-419.
17. Dupont-Nivet, M., Guiller, A. and Bonnet, J. C. (1997). Genetic and environmental variability of adult size in some stocks of the edible snail, Helix aspersa Müller. J. Zool. 241, 757-765.
18. Dupont-Nivet, M., Mallard, J., Bonnet, J. C. and Blanc, J. M. (2000). Direct and correlated responses to individual selection for large adult weight in the edible snail Helix aspersa Müller. J. Exp. Zool. 287, 80-85.
19. Epp, R. W. and Lewis, W. M. (1980). The nature and ecological significance of metabolic changes during the life history of copepods. Ecology 61, 259-264.
20. Falconer, D. S., Gauld, I. K. and Roberts, R. C. (1978). Cell numbers and cell sizes in organs of mice selected for large and small body size. Genet. Res. Camb. 31, 287-301.
21. Furness, R. W. (2003). It's in the genes. Nature 425, 779-780.
22. Glazier, D. S. (1990). Constraints on the offspring production efficiency of Peromyscus and other rodents. Funct. Ecol. 4, 223-231.
23. Glazier, D. S. (1991). Separating the respiration rates of embryos and brooding females of Daphnia magna: implications for the cost of brooding and the allometry of metabolic rate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 354-362.
24. Glazier, D. S. (2005). Beyond the '3/4-power law': variation in the intra-and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biol. Rev. 80, 611-662.
25. Glazier, D. S. (2006). The 3/4-power law is not universal: evolution of isometric, ontogenetic metabolic scaling in pelagic animals. BioScience 56, 325-332.
26. Heusner, A. A. (1982). Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber a statistical artifact? Respir. Physiol. 48, 1-12.
27. Jörgensen, C. B. (1988). Metabolic costs of growth and maintenance in the toad, Bufo bufo. J. Exp. Biol. 138, 319-331.
28. Kayser, Ch. and Heusner, A. (1964). Étude comparative du métabolisme énergetique dans la série animale. J. Physiol. Paris 56, 489-524.
29. Kindlemann, P., Dixon, A. F. G. and Dostálková, I. (1999). Does body size optimization result in skewed body size distribution on a logarithmic scale? Am. Nat. 153, 445-447.
30. Konarzewski, M. (1995). Allocation of energy to growth and respiration in avian postembryonic development. Ecology 76, 8-19.
31. Konarzewski, M., Gavin, A., McDevitt, R. and Wallis, I. R. (2000). Metabolic and organ mass responses to selection for high growth rates in the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73, 237-248.
32. Kooijman, S. A. L. M. (2000). Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kozłowski, J. and Gawelczyk, A. (2002). Why are species' body size distributions usually skewed to the right? Funct. Ecol. 16, 419-432.
34. Kozłowski, J. and Teriokhin, A. T. (1999). Allocation of energy between growth and reproduction: the Pontryagin Maximum Principle solution for the case of age- and season-dependent mortality. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 423-441.
35. Kozłowski, J. and Weiner, J. (1997). Interspecific allometries are by-products of body size optimization. Am. Nat. 149, 352-380.
36. Kozłowski, J., Konarzewski, M. and Gawełczyk, A. (2003). Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14080-14085.
37. Kozłowski, J., Czarnołȩski, M. and Dańko, M. (2004). Can optimal allocation models explain why ectotherms grow larger in cold? Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 480-493.
38. Lochmiller, R. L. and Deerenberg, C. (2000). Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just what is the cost of immunity? Oikos 88, 87-98.
39. MacLaury, D. W. and Johnson, T. H. (1972). Selection for low oxygen consumption in chickens. Poult. Sci. 51, 591-597.
40. Martin, L. B., II, Scheuerlein, A. and Wikelski, M. (2003). Immune activity elevates energy expenditure of house sparrows: a link between direct and indirect costs? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 153-158.
41. McMahon, T. A. (1973). Size and shape in biology. Science 179, 1201-1204.
42. Medrano, J. F. and Gall, G. A. E. (1976a). Growth rate, body composition, cellular growth and enzyme activities in lines of Tribolium castaneum selected for 21-day pupa weight. Genetics 83, 376-391.
43. Medrano, J. F. and Gall, G. A. E. (1976b). Food consumption, feed efficiency, metabolic rate and utilization of glucose in lines of Tribolium castaneum selected for 21-day pupa weight. Genetics 83, 393-407.
44. Metcalfe, N. B. and Monaghan, P. (2001). Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 254-260.
45. Monaghan, P. and Haussmann, M. F. (2006). Do telomere dynamics link lifestyle and lifespan? Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 47-53.
46. Muthukrishan, J. and Pandian, T. J. (1987). Insecta. In Animal Energetics. Vol. 2 (ed. T. J. Pandian and F. J. Vernberg), pp. 373-511. San Diego: Academic Press.
47. Palmer, A. R. (1992). Calcification in marine molluscs: how costly is it? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1379-1382.
48. Partridge, L., Langelan, R., Fowler, K., Zwaan, B. and French, V. (1999). Correlated responses to selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. Camb. 74, 43-54.
49. Peters, R. H. (1983). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Pigliucci, M. and Preston, K. (2004). Phenotypic Integration Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Plorin, G. and Gilbertson, D. E. (1984). Equation for describing growth of the schistosome host snail Biomphalaria glabrata. Physiol. Zool. 46, 252-275.
52. Post, J. R. and Lee, J. A. (1996). Metabolic ontogeny of teleost fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 910-923.
53. Radwan, J., Chadzińska, M., Cichoń, M., Mills, S. C., Matula, B., Sadowska, E. T., Baliga, K., Stanisz, A., Lopuch, S. and Koteja, P. (2006). Metabolic costs of sexual advertisement in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 859-869.
54. Riisgård, H. U. (1998). No foundation of a '3/4 power scaling law' for respiration in biology. Ecol. Lett. 1, 71-73.
55. Rubner, M. (1883). Über den Einfluss der Körpergrö sse auf Stoffund Kraftwechsel. Z. Biol. Munich 19, 535-562.
56. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984). Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Sibly, R. M. and Calow, P. (1986). Physiological Ecology of Animals. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
58. Simčič, T. and Brancelj, A. (2003). Estimation of the proportion of metabolically active mass in the amphipod Gammarus fossarum. Freshw. Biol. 48, 1093-1099.
59. Sinervo, B. and Huey, R. B. (1990). Allometric engineering: an experimental test of the causes of interpopulational differences in performance. Science 248, 1106-1109.
60. Stevenson, R. D., Hill, M. F. and Bryant, P. J. (1995). Organ and cell allometry in Hawaiian Drosophila: how to make a big fly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 259, 105-110.
61. Trudel, M., Tremblay, A., Schetagne, R. and Rasmussen, J. B. (2001). Why are dwarf fish so small? An energetic analysis of polymorphism in lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 394-405.
62. von Bertalanffy, L. (1951). Metabolic types and growth types. Am. Nat. 85, 111-117.
63. von Bertalanffy, L. (1957). Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. Q. Rev. Biol. 32, 217-231.
64. West, G. B., Brown, J. H. and Enquist, B. J. (1997). A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276, 122-126.
65. Wieser, W. (1994). Cost of growth in cells and organisms: general rules and comparative aspects. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 69, 1-34.