Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: Comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 147-155

  Lee, Su Hyun ^a   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a   Cho, Nariya ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Moon, Hyeong Gon ^a   Han, Wonshik ^a   Noh, Dong Young ^a   Lee, Jung Chan ^a   Kim, Hee Chan ^a   Lee, Kyoung Bun ^a   Park, In Ae ^a  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

breast; carcinoma; elastic modulus; elastography; shear wave

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRATUMORAL NECROSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE SECTION; TRANSDUCER; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR NECROSIS; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HARDNESS; HARDNESS TESTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84894076085     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:238-253
2. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:169-184
3. Barr RG. Real-Time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: Initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q. 2010;26:61-66
4. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341-350
5. Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HY, et al. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1-7
6. Sarvazyan AP, Rudenko OV, Swanson SD, et al. Shear wave elasticity imaging: A new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1419-1435
7. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: The BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012;262:435-449
8. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: Initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:1373-1386
9. Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Pattern classification of shearwave elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:1069-1075
10. Barr RG. Sonographic breast elastography: A primer. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:773-783
11. Gweon HM, Youk JH, Son EJ, et al. Visually assessed colour overlay features in shear-wave elastography for breast masses: Quantification and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:658-663
12. Mendelson EB, Wear VV, Arnold L, et al. Shear wave elastography patterns of common benign and malignant breast lesions with histopathologic correlation. Radiological Society of North America 96th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. Chicago: 2010
13. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: Initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R104
14. Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Dore CJ, et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1023-1032
15. Bercoff J, Criton A, Bacrie CC. ShearWavei Elastography: A new real time imaging mode for assessing quantitatively soft tissue viscoelasticity. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. Beijing, China: 2008
16. Franchi-Abella S, Elie C, Correas JM. Ultrasound elastography: Advantages, limitations and artefacts of the different techniques from a study on a phantom. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94:497-501
17. Amador C, Urban MW, Chen S, et al. Shear elastic modulus estimation from indentation and SDUVon gelatin phantoms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:1706-1714
18. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 1998;20:260-274
19. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, et al. Elastography: Ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1999;213:203-233
20. OHagan JJ, Samani A. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of 44 pathological ex vivo breast tissue samples. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54: 2557-2569
21. Plodinec M, Loparic M, Monnier CA, et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:757-765
22. Timoshenko S, Goodier JN. Theory of Elasticity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1971
23. Zhai L, Palmeri ML, Bouchard RR, et al. An integrated indenter-ARFI imaging system for tissue stiffness quantification. Ultrason Imaging. 2008;30:95-111
24. Barr RG, Zhang Z. Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: Development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment. J UltrasoundMed. 2012;31:895-902
25. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-Term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19:403-410
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174
27. Lee RK, Griffith JF, Tong MM, et al. Glenoid bone loss: Assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 2013;267:496-502
28. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Invasive breast cancer: Relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology. 2012;263:673-677
29. Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography of invasive breast cancer: Correlation between quantitative mean elasticity value and immunohistochemical profile. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138:119-126
30. Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, et al. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:40-44
31. Schrading S, Kuhl CK. Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;246:58-70
32. Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, et al. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W347-W356
33. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, et al. Accuracy of real-Time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: A pilot study. Hepatology. 2012;56:2125-2133
34. Chammings F, Latorre-Ossa H, Le Frere-Belda MA, et al. Shear wave elastography of tumour growth in a human breast cancer model with pathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2079-2086
35. Warner L, Yin M, Glaser KJ, et al. Noninvasive in vivo assessment of renal tissue elasticity during graded renal ischemia using MR elastography. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:509-514
36. Korsmo MJ, Ebrahimi B, Eirin A, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography noninvasively detects in vivo renal medullary fibrosis secondary to swine renal artery stenosis. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:61-68
37. Stavros AT. Breast Ultrasound. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:445-527
38. Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Bercoff J, et al. On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58:2032-2035
39. Barr RG. Shear wave imaging of the breast: Still on the learning curve. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:347-350
40. Rouze NC, Wang MH, Palmeri ML, et al. Parameters affecting the resolution and accuracy of 2-D quantitative shear wave images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:1729-1740
41. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1015-1026
42. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Muhi A, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography as a predictor of insufficient liver enhancement on gadoxetic acidenhanced hepatocyte-phase magnetic resonance imaging in patients with type C hepatitis and Child-Pugh class A disease. Invest Radiol. 2012;47: 566-570
43. Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Ultrasound. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology;2003