Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-7

  Cho, Nariya ^a   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a   Kim, Ha Young ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Park, Sang Hee ^a   Lyou, Chae Yeon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm diagnosis; Breast sonography; Sonoelastography; Sonographic tissue characterization

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGIES; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEMS; BREAST NEOPLASM; BREAST SONOGRAPHY; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE ANALYSIS; SONOELASTOGRAPHY; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 75149141067     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hall TJ. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Topics in US: beyond the basics - elasticity imaging with US. Radiographics 2003; 23:1657-1671.
2. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20:260-274.
3. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997; 202:79-86.
4. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:427-435.
5. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging - clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006; 238:425-437.
6. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007; 245:401-410.
7. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239:341-350.
8. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:2381-2389.
9. Tan SM, Teh HS, Mancer JF, Poh WT. Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography: a clinical approach. Breast 2008; 17:252-257.
10. Ueno E, Umemoto T, Bando H, Tohno E, Waki K, Matsumura T. New quantitative method in breast elastography: fat-lesion ratio (FLR) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America; 2007:697.
11. Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al. Semi-quantitating stiffness of breast solid lesions in ultrasonic elastography. Acad Radiol 2008; 15:1347-1353.
12. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS): Ultrasound. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
13. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography: initial experience. Radiology 2007; 243:258-267.