Combining best-practice and experimental approaches: Redundancy, images, and misperceptions in multimedia learning

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 253-263

  Fenesi, Barbara ^a   Heisz, Jennifer ^a,b   Savage, Philip I ^a   Shore, David I ^a,c   Kim, Joseph A ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

classroom research; instruction; instructional design development; learning theory model; teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893976964     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2012.745472     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adesope, O. O., and, Nesbit, J. C. 2012. Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104: 250-263.
2. Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., and, Scepansky, J. A. 2008. An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers & Education, 50: 148-153.
3. Baddeley, A. D. 2002. Is working memory still working?. European Psychologist, 7: 85-97.
4. Baddeley, A. D., and, Hitch, G. J. 1974. " Working memory ". In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Edited by: Bower, G. A. 47-89. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Barab, S., and, Squire, K. 2004. Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Leaning Sciences, 13: 1-14.
6. Bartsch, R. A., and, Cobern, K. M. 2003. Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers and Education, 41: 77-86.
7. Benjamin, A. S., and, Bjork, R. A. 1996. " Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index ". In Implicit memory and metacognition, Edited by: Reder, L. 309-338. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Bergkvist, L., and, Rossiter, J. R. 2007. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same construct. Journal of Marketing Research, 44: 175-184.
9. Brown, A. L. 1992. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2: 141-178.
10. Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., and, Leutner, D. 2003. Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38: 53-61.
11. Chandler, P., and, Sweller, J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8: 293-332.
12. Daniel, D. B., and, Woody, W. D. 2010. They hear, but do not listen: Retention for podcasted material in a classroom context. Teaching of Psychology, 37: 199-203.
13. Feldon, D. F. 2007. Cognitive load and classroom teaching: The double-edged sword of automaticity. Educational Psychologist, 42: 123-137.
14. Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., and, Pierce, J. L. 1998. Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58: 898-915.
15. Ghauth, K. I., and, Abdullah, N. A. 2010. Learning materials recommendation using good learners ratings and content-based filtering. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58: 711-727.
16. Glaser, C. W., Rieth, H. J., Kinzer, C. K., Colburn, L. K., and, Jeanne, P. 1999. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14: 27-43.
17. Gyselinck, V. 1996. Illustrations and mental models in text comprehension. LAnnee Psychologique, 96: 495-516.
18. Hansen, J., and, Wanke, M. 2009. Liking what's familiar: The importance of unconscious familiarity in the mere-exposure effect. Social Cognition, 27: 161-182.
19. Jacobs, P. 1992. Education must invest in multimedia to reap productivity dividend. InfoWord, 14: 39-39.
20. Jacoby, L. L., Bjork, R. A., and, Kelley, C. M. 1994. " Illusions of comprehensions and competence ". In Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing individual and team performance, Edited by: Druckman, D. and Bjork, R. A. 57-80. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Jianxin, W. 2003. Large class multimedia instruction in college English reading courses: An experiment. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 35: 364-371.
22. Kalmbach, J. A. 1994. Just in time for the 21st century: Multimedia in the classroom. TechTrends, 39: 29-32.
23. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and, Sweller, J. 1998. Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40: 1-17.
24. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and, Sweller, J. 1999. Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13: 351-371.
25. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and, Sweller, J. 2000. Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92: 126-136.
26. Kornell, N., and, Bjork, R. A. 2008. Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the "enemy of induction"?. Psychological Science, 19: 585-592.
27. Krathwohl, D. R. 2010. A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41: 212-218.
28. Kruger, J., and, Dunning, D. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1121-1134.
29. Leahy, W., Chandler, P., and, Sweller, J. 2003. When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17: 401-418.
30. Levie, H. W., and, Lentz, R. 1982. Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 30: 195-232.
31. Mayer, R. E. 1989a. Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59: 43-64.
32. Mayer, R. E. 1989b. Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 240-246.
33. Mayer, R. E. 1992. Cognition and instruction: Their historic meeting within educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 405-412.
34. Mayer, R. E. 1997. Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?. Educational Psychologist, 32: 1-19.
35. Mayer, R. E. 2009. Multi-media learning, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Mayer, R. E., and, Moreno, R. 1998. A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90: 312-320.
37. Miller, G. A. 1956. The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity to process information. Psychological Review, 63: 81-97.
38. Moreno, R., and, Mayer, R. E. 2002. Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94: 156-163.
39. Moullin, M. 2004. Eight essentials of performance measurement. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 17: 110-112.
40. Norman, G. 2010. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15: 625-632.
41. Perenger, T. V. 1998. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316: 1236-1238.
42. Pina, A. A., and, Savenye, W. C. 1992, August. Beyond computer literacy: How can teacher educators help teachers use interactive multimedia? Washington, DC. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology
43. Richland, L. E., Linn, M. C., and, Bjork, R. A. 2007. " Cognition and instruction: Bridging laboratory and classroom settings ". In Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., Edited by: Durso, F. T. 556-583. New York, NY: Wiley.
44. Rothman, K. J. 1990. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1: 43-46.
45. Schmid, E. C. 2008. Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51: 1553-1568.
46. Sweller, J. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 11: 65-99.
47. Tarmizi, R., and, Sweller, J. 1988. Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80: 424-436.
48. Ward, M., and, Sweller, J. 1990. Structuring effective worked examples. Cognitive and Instruction, 7: 1-39.