They Hear, but Do Not Listen: Retention for Podcasted Material in a Classroom Context

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 199-203

  Daniel, David B ^a   Woody, William Douglas ^b  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954119399     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00986283.2010.488542     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1074.
2. Campbell G. (2005). There's something in the air: Podcasting in education. Educause Review, 40, 32–47.
3. DeLoache J. S. (2006). Mindful of symbols. Scientific American Mind, 17 (1), 71–75.
4. Dixon R. A. Simon E. W. Nowak C. A. Hultsch D. F. (1982). Text recall in adulthood as a function of level of information, input modality, and delay interval. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 358–364.
5. Duke University, Office of Information Technology. (2005). Duke University iPod first year experience (Final Evaluation Rep.). Retrieved November 9, 2008, from http://cit.duke.edu/pdf/reports/ipod_initiative_04_05.pdf.
6. Dunning D. Johnson K. Ehrlinger J. Kruger J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.
7. Evans C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50, 491–498.
8. Green R. (1981). Remembering ideas from text: The effect of modality of presentation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 83–89.
9. Gurung R. A. R. (2003). Pedagogical aids and student performance. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 92–95.
10. Gurung R. A. R. (2004). Pedagogical aids: Learning enhancers or dangerous detours. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 164–166.
11. Gurung R. A. R. Daniel D. B. (2005). Do text-based pedagogical features enhance student learning? In Dunn D. S. Chew S. L. (eds.), Best practices for teaching introduction to psychology (pp. 41–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Hildyard A. Olson D. R. (1982). On the comprehension and memory of oral v. written discourse. In Tannen D. (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 19–33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Kravik R. B. Caruso J. B. Morgan G. (2004). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2004: Convenience, connection, and control roadmap. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/ECARStudyofStudentsandInformat/155030.
14. Rickheit G. Strohner H. Müsseler J. Nattkemper D. (1987). Recalling oral and written discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 438–444.
15. Rosell-Aguilar F. (2007). Top of the pods—In search of a podcasting “pedagogy” for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 471–492.
16. Sannomiya M. (1982). The effect of presentation modality on text memory as a function of difficulty level. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 1, 85–90.
17. Sannomiya M. (1984). The modality effect on text processing as a function of presentation rate. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 3, 17–20.
18. Wesp R. Miele J. (2008). Student opinion of the quality of teaching activities poorly predicts pedagogical effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 360–362.