Advanced endoscopic imaging: A review of commercially available technologies

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Subramanian, Venkataraman ^a   Ragunath, Krish ^b  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AFI; Confocal endomicroscopy; FICE; HD endoscopy; I scan; NBI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTERIZED VIRTUAL CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; ENDOSCOPY; FLEXIBLE SPECTRAL IMAGING COLOR ENHANCEMENT; HIGH RESOLUTION ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NARROW BAND IMAGING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); ULCERATIVE COLITIS; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY;

AFI; CONFOCAL ENDOMICROSCOPY; FICE; HD ENDOSCOPY; I-SCAN; NBI;

ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OPTICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84893920290     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Hirchowitz B.I., Peters C.W., Curtiss L.E. Preliminary report on a long fiberscope for examination of stomach and duodenum. Med Bull (Ann Arbor) 1957, 23:178-180.
2. Kwon R.S., Adler D.G., Chand B., et al. High-resolution and high-magnification endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:399-407.
3. Tanaka S., Kaltenbach T., Chayama K., et al. High-magnification colonoscopy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 64:604-613.
4. Bruno M.J. Magnification endoscopy, high resolution endoscopy, and chromoscopy: towards a better optical diagnosis. Gut 2003, 52(Suppl 4). iv7-11.
5. Kara M.A., Peters F.P., Rosmolen W.D., et al. High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 2005, 37:929-936.
6. Curvers W., Baak L., Kiesslich R., et al. Chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging compared with high-resolution magnification endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:670-679.
7. Subramanian V., Mannath J., Hawkey C.J., et al. High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2011, 43:499-505.
8. Rex D.K., Helbig C.C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:42-47.
9. Kahi C.J., Anderson J.C., Waxman I., et al. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1301-1307.
10. Rastogi A., Early D.S., Gupta N., et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:593-602.
11. Subramanian V., Ramappa V., Telakis E., et al. Comparison of high definition with standard white light endoscopy for detection of dysplastic lesions during surveillance colonoscopy in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013, 19:350-355.
12. Song L.M., Adler D.G., Conway J.D., et al. Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 67:581-589.
13. Gono K., Obi T., Yamaguchi M., et al. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. JBiomed Opt 2004, 9:568-577.
14. Kuznetsov K., Lambert R., Rey J.F. Narrow-band imaging: potential and limitations. Endoscopy 2006, 38:76-81.
15. Kara M.A., Peters F.P., Fockens P., et al. Endoscopic video-autofluorescence imaging followed by narrow band imaging for detecting early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 64:176-185.
16. Sharma P., Bansal A., Mathur S., et al. The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 64:167-175.
17. Singh R., Anagnostopoulos G.K., Yao K., et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett's esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology. Endoscopy 2008, 40:457-463.
18. Mannath J., Subramanian V., Hawkey C.J., et al. Narrow band imaging for characterization of high grade dysplasia and specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2010, 42:351-359.
19. Curvers W.L., Herrero L.A., Wallace M.B., et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2010, 139:1106-1114.
20. Curvers W.L., van Vilsteren F.G., Baak L.C., et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging versus standard video endoscopy for detection of early Barrett's neoplasia: a multicenter, randomized, crossover study in general practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:195-203.
21. Wolfsen H.C., Crook J.E., Krishna M., et al. Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:24-31.
22. Sharma P., Hawes R.H., Bansal A., et al. Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial. Gut 2013, 62:15-21.
23. Pasha S.F., Leighton J.A., Das A., et al. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:363-370.
24. Wu L., Li Y., Li Z., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2013, 15:3-11.
25. Dekker E., van den Broek F.J., Reitsma J.B., et al. Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 2007, 39:216-221.
26. van den Broek F.J., Fockens P., van E.S., et al. Narrow-band imaging versus high-definition endoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 2011, 43:108-115.
27. Ignjatovic A., East J.E., Subramanian V., et al. Narrow band imaging for detection of dysplasia in colitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:885-890.
28. Pellise M., Lopez-Ceron M., Rodriguez de M.C., et al. Narrow-band imaging as an alternative to chromoendoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in long-standing inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:840-848.
29. Ignjatovic A., East J.E., Suzuki N., et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009, 10:1171-1178.
30. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. Aprospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008, 57:59-64.
31. Miyake Y., Nakaguchi T., Tsumura N., et al. Development of new electronic endoscopes using the spectral images of an internal organ: in Thirteenth Color Imaging Conference 2005, 261-263. Color Science and Engineering Systems, Technologies, and Applications, Scottsdale, AZ.
32. Aminalai A., Rosch T., Aschenbeck J., et al. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2383-2388.
33. Chung S.J., Kim D., Song J.H., et al. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:136-142.
34. Pohl J., Lotterer E., Balzer C., et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 2009, 58:73-78.
35. dos Santos C.E., Lima J.C., Lopes C.V., et al. Computerized virtual chromoendoscopy versus indigo carmine chromoendoscopy combined with magnification for diagnosis of small colorectal lesions: a randomized and prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 22:1364-1371.
36. Longcroft-Wheaton G.R., Higgins B., Bhandari P. Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and indigo carmine in neoplasia diagnosis during colonoscopy: a large prospective UK series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 23:903-911.
37. Pohl J., Nguyen-Tat M., Pech O., et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:562-569.
38. Hoffman A., Sar F., Goetz M., et al. High definition colonoscopy combined with i-Scan is superior in the detection of colorectal neoplasias compared with standard video colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2010, 42:827-833.
39. Hong S.N., Choe W.H., Lee J.H., et al. Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:1011-1021.
40. Hoffman A., Kagel C., Goetz M., et al. Recognition and characterization of small colonic neoplasia with high-definition colonoscopy using i-Scan is as precise as chromoendoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2010, 42:45-50.
41. Lee C.K., Lee S.H., Hwangbo Y. Narrow-band imaging versus I-Scan for the real-time histological prediction of diminutive colonic polyps: a prospective comparative study by using the simple unified endoscopic classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:603-609.
42. Curvers W.L., Singh R., Song L.M., et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system. Gut 2008, 57:167-172.
43. Curvers W.L., Herrero L.A., Wallace M.B., et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2010, 139:1106-1114.
44. Matsuda T., Saito Y., Fu K.I., et al. Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate? A pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:1926-1932.
45. Takeuchi Y., Inoue T., Hanaoka N., et al. Autofluorescence imaging with a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:1006-1013.
46. Ramsoekh D., Haringsma J., Poley J.W., et al. Aback-to-back comparison of white light video endoscopy with autofluorescence endoscopy for adenoma detection in high-risk subjects. Gut 2010, 59:785-793.
47. Kuiper T., van den Broek F.J., Naber A.H., et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging detects colonic neoplasia as well as standard video endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:1887-1894.
48. Sato R., Fujiya M., Watari J., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for differentially diagnosing colon adenoma. Endoscopy 2011, 43:862-868.
49. Ignjatovic A., East J.E., Guenther T., et al. What is the most reliable imaging modality for small colonic polyp characterization? Study of white-light, autofluorescence, and narrow-band imaging. Endoscopy 2011, 43:94-99.
50. Boparai K.S., van den Broek F.J., van Eeden S., et al. Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome: a pilot study for the differentiation of polyps by using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 70:947-955.
51. Aihara H., Sumiyama K., Saito S., et al. Numerical analysis of the autofluorescence intensity of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions by using a novel videoendoscopy system. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:726-733.
52. Matsumoto T., Moriyama T., Yao T., et al. Autofluorescence imaging colonoscopy for the diagnosis of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007, 13:640-641.
53. van den Broek F.J., Fockens P., van Eeden S., et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: randomised comparison of high-resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow-band imaging for classification of lesions. Gut 2008, 57:1083-1089.
54. Matsumoto T., Nakamura S., Moriyama T., et al. Autofluorescence imaging colonoscopy for the detection of dysplastic lesions in ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Colorectal Dis 2010, 12:e291-e297.
55. Wang T.D. Confocal microscopy from the bench to the bedside. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:696-697.
56. Kantsevoy S.V., Adler D.G., Conway J.D., et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 70:197-200.
57. Kiesslich R., Burg J., Vieth M., et al. Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer invivo. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:706-713.
58. Buchner A.M., Shahid M.W., Heckman M.G., et al. Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps. Gastroenterology 2010, 138:834-842.
59. Kuiper T., van den Broek F.J., van E.S., et al. Feasibility and accuracy of confocal endomicroscopy in comparison with narrow-band imaging and chromoendoscopy for the differentiation of colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:543-550.
60. Gomez V., Buchner A.M., Dekker E., et al. Interobserver agreement and accuracy among international experts with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in predicting colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2010, 42:286-291.
61. Kiesslich R., Goetz M., Lammersdorf K., et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:874-882.
62. van den Broek F.J., van Es J.A., van Eeden S., et al. Pilot study of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during colonoscopic surveillance of patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 2011, 43:116-122.
63. Neumann H., Vieth M., Atreya R., et al. Assessment of Crohn's disease activity by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012, 18:2261-2269.
64. Li C.Q., Xie X.J., Yu T., et al. Classification of inflammation activity in ulcerative colitis by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1391-1396.
65. Kiesslich R., Gossner L., Goetz M., et al. Invivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:979-987.
66. Dunbar K.B., Okolo P., Montgomery E., et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus and endoscopically inapparent Barrett's neoplasia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 70:645-654.
67. Pohl H., Rosch T., Vieth M., et al. Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 2008, 57:1648-1653.
68. Sharma P., Meining A.R., Coron E., et al. Real-time increased detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: final results of an international multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:465-472.
69. Wallace M.B., Sharma P., Lightdale C., et al. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:19-24.