Evaluation of upper extremity reachable workspace using Kinect camera

Technology and Health Care

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 641-656

  Kurillo, Gregorij ^a,b   Chen, Alic ^c   Bajcsy, Ruzena ^a   Han, Jay J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

functional evaluation; Kinect; reachable workspace; upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KINECT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACHABLE WORKSPACE; REMOTE SENSING;

FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION; KINECT; REACHABLE WORKSPACE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84893805128     PISSN: 09287329     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/THC-130764     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Macedo LG, Magee DJ. Differences in range of motion between dominant and nondominant sides of upper and lower extremities. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008; 31(8): 577-582.
2. Sharpless J. The nine hole peg test of finger hand coordination for the hemiplegic patient. In: Sharpless J. A Problem Oriented Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1982. p. 470-473.
3. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969; 50(6): p. 311-319.
4. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer A, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001; 32(7): 1635-1639.
5. Brooke M, Griggs R, Mendell J, Fenichel G, Shumate J, Pellegrino R. Clinical trial in Duchenne dystrophy. I. The design of the protocol. Muscle Nerve. 1981; 4(3): 186-197.
6. Lang C, Bland M, Bailey R, Schaefer S, Birkenmeier R. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013; 26(2): 104-114.
7. Mazzone E, Vasco G, Palermo C, Bianco F, Galluccio C, Ricotti V, Castronovo AD, Mauro MS, Pane M, Mayhew A, Mercuri E. A critical review of functional assessment tools for upper limbs in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012; 54(10): 879-885.
8. Roller A, Mounts R, DeLong J, Hanypsiak B. Outcome instruments for the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(5): 955-964.
9. Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Corrected. Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6): 602-608.
10. Mullaney M, McHugh M, Johnson C, Tyler T. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010; 26(5): 327-333.
11. Zacharias F, Borst C, Hirzinger G. Capturing robot workspace structure: representing robot capabilities. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2007. p. 3229-3236.
12. Kennedy K. Reach capability of men and women: A three dimensional analysis. Report No. AMRL-tr-77-50. OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories; 1978.
13. Li S, Xi Z. The measurement of functional arm reach envelopes for young Chinese males. Ergonomics. 1999; 33: 967-978.
14. Abdel-Malek K, Yang J, Brand R, Tanbour E. Towards understanding the workspace of human limbs. Ergonomics. 2004; 47: 1386-1405.
15. Behara D, Das B. Anthropometric modelling for the determination of 3D maximum functional reach. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2010; 12: 87-101.
16. Zacharias F, Howard IS, Hulin T, Hirzinger G. Workspace comparisons of setup configurations for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2010; Taipei, Ta i wa n.
17. Schiele A, Helm FCT, Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng. 2006; 14(4): 456-469.
18. Klopcar N, Lenarcic J. Kinematic model for determination of human arm reachable workspace. Meccanica. 2005; 40: 203-219.
19. Kurillo G, Han JJ, Abresch RT, Nicorici A, Yan P, Bajcsy R. Development and application of stereo camera-based upper extremity workspace evaluation in patients with neuromuscular diseases. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(9).
20. Zhang Z. Microsoft Kinect sensor and its effect. IEEE MultiMedia. 2012; 19(2): 4-12.
21. Clark RA, Pua YH, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L, Bryant AL. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait and Posture. 2012; 36: 372-377.
22. Stone E, Skubic M. Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. 2011; 3(4): 349-361.
23. Lowes L, Alfano L, Yetter B, Worthen-Chaudhari L, Hinchman W, Savage J, Samona P, Flanigan KM, Mendell JR. Proof of concept of the ability of the Kinect to quantify upper extremity function in dystrophinopathy. PLoS Currents. 2013; 14(5).
24. Chang CY, Lange B, Zhang M, Koenig S, Requejo P, Somboon N, Sawchuk A, Rizzo AA. Towards pervasive physical rehabilitation using Microsoft Kinect. In Proceedings of PervasiveHealth; 2012. p. 159-162.
25. th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems; 2012. p. 656-661.
26. Choppin S, Wheat J. The potential of the Microsoft Kinect in sports analysis and biomechanics. Sports Technology. 2013; 6(2): 78-85.
27. th International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2012; San Diego, CA.
28. Kurillo G, Han JJ, Obdržálek Yan P, Abresh RT, Nicorici A, Yan P, Bajcsy R. Upper extremity reachable workspace evaluation with Kinect. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 184: 247-253.
29. Khoshelham K, Elberink SO. Accuracy and resolution of Kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors. 2012; 12(2): 1437-1454.
30. Edelsbrunner H, Mücke EP. Three-dimensional alpha shapes. In: Proceedings of the 1992 workshop on Volume visualization; 1992. p. 75-82.
31. Catmull E, Rom R. A class of local interpolating splines. In: Barnhill RE, Riesenfled RF, editors. Computer Aided Geometric Design. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 317-326.
32. Doriot N, Wang X. Effects of age and gender on maximum voluntary range of motion of the upper body joints. Ergonomics. 2006; 49(3): 269-281.
33. TMsensor? In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies; 2012; Laval, France. p. 287-294.