Effect of surface roughness in the determination of the mechanical properties of material using nanoindentation test

Scanning

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 134-149

  Xia, Yang ^a   Bigerelle, Maxence ^b   Marteau, Julie ^a   Mazeran, Pierre Emmanuel ^a   Bouvier, Salima ^a   Iost, Alain ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

^c ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

first contact; hardness; indentation size effect; nanoindentation; roughness

Indexed keywords

DEPTH DETERMINATION; EXPERIMENTAL CURVES; INDENTATION SIZE EFFECTS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS; NANOINDENTATION TESTS; NON-REPRODUCIBILITY; QUANTITATIVE MODELING; STATISTICAL TREATMENT;

ELASTIC MODULI; ERRORS; HARDNESS; HIGH PASS FILTERS; SILICON CARBIDE; STATISTICS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

NANOINDENTATION;

ALLOY; SILICON CARBIDE; TITANIUM; WATER;

ARTICLE; HARDNESS; INDENTATION SIZE; INTERFEROMETER; INTERFEROMETRY; MACHINE; MATERIAL STATE; MATERIALS TESTING; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; NANOINDENTATION TEST; PAPER; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROUGHNESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 84893796963     PISSN: 01610457     EISSN: 19328745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sca.21111     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aguilar-Santillan J., 2008. Elastic and hardness anisotropy and the indentation size effect of pyrite (FeS2) single crystal. Acta Mater 56: 2476-2487.
2. Bernhardt E., 1941. On microhardness of solids at the limit of Kick's similarity law. Z Metallkd 33: 135-144.
3. Bigerelle M, Anselme K., 2005. Bootstrap analysis of the relation between initial adhesive events and long-term cellular functions of human osteoblasts cultured on biocompatible metallic substrates. Acta Biomater 1: 499-510.
4. Bigerelle M, Iost A., 1999. Bootstrap analysis of FCGR, application to the Paris relationship and to lifetime prediction. Int J Fatigue 21: 299-307.
5. Bigerelle M, Anselme K, Dufresne E, Hardouin P, Iost A., 2002. An unscaled parameter to measure the order of surfaces: a new surface elaboration to increase cells adhesion. Biomol Eng 19: 79-83.
6. Bigerelle M, Najjar D, Iost A., 2005. Multiscale functional analysis of wear: a fractal model of the grinding process. Wear 258: 232-239.
7. Bigerelle M, Gautier A, Iost A., 2007a. Roughness characteristic length scales of micro-machined surfaces: a multi-scale modelling. Sens. Actuator B-Chem 126: 126-137.
8. Bigerelle M, Mazeran PE, Rachik M., 2007b. The first indenter-sample contact and the indentation size effect in nano-hardness measurement. Mater Sci Eng C 27: 1448-1451.
9. Bigerelle M, Hagege B, El Mansori M., 2008. Mechanical modelling of micro-scale abrasion in superfinish belt grinding. Tribol Int 41: 992-1001.
10. Bigerelle M, Gautier A, Hagege B, Favergeon J, Bounichane B., 2009. Roughness characteristic length scales of belt finished surface. J Mater Process Technol 209: 6103-6116.
11. Bigerelle M, Mathia T, Bouvier S., 2012. The multi-scale roughness analyses and modeling of abrasion with the grit size effect on ground surfaces. Wear 286-287: 124-135.
12. Fischer-Cripps AC., 2000. A review of analysis methods for sub-micron indentation testing. Vacuum 58: 569-585.
13. Fischer-Cripps AC., 2006. Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data. Surf Coat Tech 200: 4153-4165.
14. Gao HJ, Huang YG., 2003. Geometrically necessary dislocation and size-dependent plasticity. Scripta Mater 48: 113-118.
15. Grau P, Berg G, Fraenzel W, Meinhard H., 1994. Recording hardness testing. Problems of measurement at small indentation depths. Phys Status Solidi A 146: 537-548.
16. Huang YJ, Shen J, Sun Y, Sun JF., 2010. Indentation size effect of hardness of metallic glasses. Mater Des 31: 1563-1566.
17. Iost A, Bigot R., 1996. Indentation size effect: reality or artefact ? J Mater Sci 31: 3573-3577.
18. Isselin J, Iost A, Golek J, Najjar D, Bigerelle M., 2006. Assessment of the constitutive law by inverse methodology: small punch test and hardness. J Nucl Mater 352: 97-106.
19. Jang J, Yoo BG, Kim YJ, Oh JH, Choi IC, Bei H., 2011. Indentation size effect in bulk metallic glass. Scripta Mater 64: 753-756.
20. Jordan SE, Brown CA., 2006. Comparing texture characterization parameters on their ability to differentiate ground polyethylene ski bases. Wear 261: 398-409.
21. Kalidindi SR, Pathak S., 2008. Determination of the effective zero-point and the extraction of spherical nanoindentation stress-strain curves. Acta Mater 56: 3523-3532.
22. Kick F., 1885. Das Gesetz der proportionalen Widerstände und seine Anwendungen: Felix.
23. Kim J, Kang S, Lee J, Jang J, Lee Y, Kwon D., 2007. Influence of surface-roughness on indentation size effect. Acta Mater 55: 3555-3562.
24. Kim J, Lee B, Read D, Kwon D., 2005. Influence of tip bluntness on the size-dependent nanoindentation hardness. Scripta Mater 52: 353-358.
25. Klein CA, Cardinale GF., 1993. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of CVD diamond. Diamond Relat Mater 2: 918-923.
26. Lee Y, Hahn J, Nahm S, Jang J, Kwon D., 2008. Investigations on indentation size effects using a pile-up corrected hardness. J Phys D Appl Phys 41: 074027.
27. Li XD, Bhushan B., 2002. A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater Charact 48: 11-36.
28. Liu Y, Ngan AHW., 2001. Depth dependence of hardness in copper single crystals measured by nanoindentation. Scripta Mater 44: 237-241.
29. Marteau J, Maxence B, Xia Y, Mazeran PE, Bouvier S., 2013. Quantification of first contact detection errors on hardness and indentation size effect measurements. Tribol Int 59: 154-162.
30. Mukhopadhyay N, Paufler P., 2006. Micro-and nanoindentation techniques for mechanical characterisation of materials. Int Mater Rev 51: 209-245.
31. Najjar D, Bigerelle M, Iost A., 2003. The computer-based bootstrap method as a tool to select a relevant surface roughness parameter. Wear 254: 450-460.
32. Narayan P, Hancock BC, Hamel R, Bergstrom TS, Childs BE, Brown CA., 2006. Differentiation of the surface topographies of pharmaceutical excipient compacts. Mater Sci Eng A 430: 79-89.
33. Nix WD, Gao HJ., 1998. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 46: 411-425.
34. Nowicki B., 1985. Multiparameter representation of surface roughness. Wear 102: 161-176.
35. Ohmori H, Katahira K, Uehara Y, Watanabe Y, Lin W., 2003. Improvement of mechanical strength of micro tools by controlling surface characteristics. Cirp Ann-Manuf Technol 52: 467-470.
36. Oliver WC, Pharr GM., 1992. Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7: 1564-1583.
37. Oliver WC, Pharr GM., 2010. Nanoindentation in materials research: past, present, and future. MRS Bull 35: 897-907.
38. Qu S, Huang Y, Nix WD, Jiang H, Zhang F, Hwan KC., 2004. Indenter tip radius effect on the Nix-Gao relation in micro- and nanoindentation hardness experiments. J Mater Res 19: 3423-3434.
39. Schervish M., 1996. P values: what they are and what they are not. Am Stat 50: 203.
40. Scott RS, Ungar PS, Bergstrom TS, et al,. 2005. Dental microwear texture analysis shows within-species diet variability in fossil hominins. Nature 436: 693-695.
41. Ullner C., 2000. Requirement of a robust method for the precise determination of the contact point in the depth sensing hardness test. Measurement 27: 43-51.
42. Wei PJ, Tsai PW, Lin JF., 2008. Micro-contact analysis for the initial contact in nanoindentation tests. Tribol Int 41: 1247-1254.
43. Zhang TY, Xu WH, Zhao MH., 2004. The role of plastic deformation of rough surfaces in the size-dependent hardness. Acta Mater 52: 57-68.
44. Zhanga TY, Xu WH., 2002. Surface effects on nanoindentation. J Mater Res 17: 1716.