Mechanical modelling of micro-scale abrasion in superfinish belt grinding

Tribology International

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 992-1001

  Bigerelle, Maxence ^a   Hagege, Benjamin ^a,b   El Mansori, Mohamed ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LILLE 1   (France)

^c ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Abrasion; Belt grinding; Fractal analysis; Modeling; Roughness; Wear

Indexed keywords

ABRASION; CONES; FRACTAL DIMENSION; FRACTALS; GRINDING (COMMINUTION); GRINDING (MACHINING); POLISHING; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIFICATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; TRIBOLOGY; WEAR RESISTANCE;

ABRASIVE POLISHING; AUTOMOTIVE DESIGNERS; BASIC IDEA; BELT GRINDING; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; FINISHING PROCESSES; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; FRACTAL SURFACES; FUNCTIONAL MODELING; GRINDING PROCESSES; MECHANICAL MODELLING; MICRO-SCALE ABRASION; MODELING; OPTIMIZATION SCHEMES; POLISHING PROCESSES; ROUGHNESS; SHIFT ABILITY; THREE PARAMETERS; WEAR; WEAR VOLUME;

SURFACE MORPHOLOGY;

EID: 47149100664     PISSN: 0301679X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Stout J., Sullivan P.J., Dong W.P., Mainsah E., Luo N., Mathia T.G., et al. The development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions (1993), Commission of the European Communities
2. Whitehouse D.J. Handbook of surface metrology (1994), IOP Publishing, Philadelphia
3. Najjar D., Bigerelle M., and Iost A. The computer based bootstrap method as a tool to select a relevant surface roughness parameter. Wear 254 5-6 (2003) 450-460
4. Anselme K., Bigerelle M., Noel B., Dufresnes E., Judas D., Iost A., et al. Qualitative and quantitatives study of human osteoblasts adhesion on materials with differents surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res 49 2 (2000) 155-166
5. Meine K., Kloß K., Schneider T., and Spaltmann D. The influence of surface roughness on the adhesion force. Surf. Interface Anal. 36 8 (2004) 694-697
6. Maradudin A. Light scattering and nanoscale surface roughness (2007), Springer, New York
7. Bigerelle M., Najjar D., and Iost A. Relevance of roughness parameters for description and modeling of machined surfaces. J Mater Sci 38 11 (2003) 2525-2536
8. Ford I.J. Roughness effect on friction for multi-asperity contact between surfaces. J Phys D: Appl Phys 26 (1993) 2219-2225
9. Najjar D., Bigerelle M., Hennebelle F., and Iost A. Contribution of statistical methods to the study of worn paint coatings surface topography. Surf Coat Technol 200 20-21 (2006) 6088-6100
10. Mathia T.G., 3D surface morphology measurements in abrasive machining, In:, Oczos E., Burek J., editors. 30th Scientific school on abrasive machining, bases & techniques of abrasive machining. Rzeszow, Poland, 2007. p. 144-156, [ISBN:978-83-7199-448-7].
11. Shaw M.C. Principles of abrasive processing (1996), Oxford Science Publications
12. El Mansori M., Sura E., Ghidossi P., Deblaise S., Dal Negro T., and Khanfir H. Toward physical description of form and finish performance in dry belt finishing process by a tribo-energetic approach. J Mater Process Tech 182 1-3 (2007) 498-511
13. Varghese B., and Malkin S. Experimental investigation of methods to enhance stock removal for superfinishing. Ann CIRP 47 (1998) 231-234
14. Sura E., Mansori M.E., Ghidossi P., Deblaise S., Dal Negro T., and Khanfir H. An energy analysis of belt polishing process and its applications to time cycle and tracking effects. Mach Sci Tech 11 2 (2007) 217-234
15. Grzesik W., Rech J., and Wanat T. Surface finish on hardened bearing steel parts produced by superhard and abrasive tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47 2 (2007) 255-262
16. Khellouki A., Rech J., and Zahouani H. The effect of abrasive grain's wear and contact conditions on surface texture in belt finishing. Wear 263 1-6 (2007) 81-87
17. Pradip K., and Saha A. Case study on the abrasive surface finishing of aluminum flat sheet. Wear 258 1-4 (2005) 13-17
18. Trumpold H. Process related assessment and supervision of surface textures. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41 13-14 (2001) 1981-1993
19. ISO 13565-2. 1 Stade courant 90.93 TC 213, Spécification géométrique des produits (GPS) État de surface: Méthode du profil; surfaces ayant des propriétés fonctionnelles différentes suivant les niveau, Partie 2: Caractérisation des hauteurs par la courbe de taux de longueur portante ISO abbott, 1996.
20. AFNOR. NF-EN-ISO-12085: État de surface: Méthode du profil. Paramètres liés au profil (1998), Norme AFNOR
21. ISO 4287. Spécification géométrique des produits (GPS) État de surface: Méthode du profil-Termes, définitions et paramètres d'état de surface, 1997.
22. Hamdi H., Dursapt M., and Zahouani H. Characterization of abrasive grain's behavior and wear mechanisms. Wear 254 12 (2003) 1294-1298
23. Yang Q., Senda T., and Ohmori A. Effect of carbide grain size on microstructure and sliding wear behavior of HVOF-sprayed WC-12% Co coatings. Wear 254 1-2 (2003) 23-34
24. Fang L., Xing J., Liu W., Xue Q., Wu G., and Zhang X. Computer simulation of two-body abrasion processes. Wear 251 1-12 (2001) 1356-1360
25. Santner E., Klaffke D., Meine K., Polaczyk Ch., and Spaltmann D. Demonstration of topography modification by friction processes and vice versa. Tribol Int 39 5 (2006) 450-455
26. Bhattacharyya K., and Mukherjee A. Modeling and simulation of centerless grinding of ball bearings. Simulation Modelling Pract Theory 14 7 (2006) 971-988
27. Fouvry S., Liskiewicz T., and Paulin C. Global-local wear approach to quantify the contact endurance under reciprocating-fretting sliding conditions. Wear 263 1-6 (2007) 518-531
28. Podsiadlo P., and Stachowiak G.W. Fractal-wavelet based classification of tribological surfaces. Wear 254 11 (2003) 1189-1198
29. Stachowiak G.W. Numerical characterization of wear particles morphology and angularity of particles and surfaces. Tribol Int 31 1-3 (1998) 139-157
30. Carpinteri A., and Pugno N. Evolutionary fractal theory of erosion and experimental assessment on MIR space station. Wear 257 3-4 (2004) 408-413
31. Kang M.C., Kim J.S., and Kim K.H. Fractal dimension analysis of machined surface depending on coated tool wear. Surf Coat Tech 193 1-3 (2005) 259-265
32. Yuan C.Q., Li J., Yan X.P., and Peng Z. The use of the fractal description to characterize engineering surfaces and wear particles. Wear 255 1-6 (2003) 315-326
33. Kokkalis A.G., and Panagouli O.K. Fractal evaluation of pavement skid resistance variations. II: surface wear. Chaos Solitons Fractals 9 11 (1998) 1891-1899
34. Rosén B.G., Ohlsson R., and Thomas T.R. Nano metrology of cylinder bore wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38 5-6 (1998) 519-527
35. Bigerelle M., Najjar D., and Iost A. Multiscale functional analyses of wear: a fractal model of the grinding process. Wear 258 1-4 (2005) 232-239
36. Bigerelle M. Caractérisation géométrique des surfaces et interfaces: applications en métallurgie. PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, Lille, France, 1999.
37. Tricot C. Courbes et dimension fractale (1993), Springer, Paris
38. Najjar D., Bigerelle M., and Iost A. Indentification of the mechanism of scratch generation on retrieved femoral head. Wear 258 (2005) 240-250
39. Jha S., and Jain V.K. Modeling and simulation of surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Wear 261 7-8 (2006) 856-866
40. Pawlus P. Simulation of stratified surface topographies. Wear 264 5-6 (2008) 457-463
41. Andersson S., Söderberg A., and Olofsson U. A random wear model for the interaction between a rough and a smooth surface. Wear 264 9-10 (2008) 763-769
42. Tomanik E. Friction and wear bench tests of different engine liner surface finishes. Tribol Int, in press, doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2007.11.019.