Cascaded Effects of Spatial Adaptation in the Early Visual System

Neuron

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 529-535

  Dhruv, Neel T ^a   Carandini, Matteo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RHODOPSIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTEGRATION; INTERNEURON; LATERAL GENICULATE BODY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SPATIAL SUMMATION; STRIATE CORTEX; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; GENICULATE BODIES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RHODOPSIN; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 84893506039     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.025     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adrian E.D., Zotterman Y. The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings: Part 3. Impulses set up by Touch and Pressure. J.Physiol. 1926, 61:465-483.
2. Alonso J.M., Usrey W.M., Reid R.C. Rules of connectivity between geniculate cells and simple cells in cat primary visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 2001, 21:4002-4015.
3. Arenkiel B.R., Peca J., Davison I.G., Feliciano C., Deisseroth K., Augustine G.J., Ehlers M.D., Feng G. Invivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2. Neuron 2007, 54:205-218.
4. Atallah B.V., Bruns W., Carandini M., Scanziani M. Parvalbumin-expressing interneurons linearly transform cortical responses to visual stimuli. Neuron 2012, 73:159-170.
5. Baccus S.A., Meister M. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 2002, 36:909-919.
6. Benucci A., Saleem A.B., Carandini M. Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:724-729.
7. Bonin V., Mante V., Carandini M. The suppressive field of neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurosci. 2005, 25:10844-10856.
8. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
9. Brenner N., Bialek W., de Ruyter van Steveninck R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 2000, 26:695-702.
10. Camp A.J., Tailby C., Solomon S.G. Adaptable mechanisms that regulate the contrast response of neurons in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:5009-5021.
11. Carandini M. Visual cortex: Fatigue and adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:R605-R607.
12. Carandini M., Ferster D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 1997, 276:949-952.
13. Carandini M., Heeger D.J. Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13:51-62.
14. Condon C.D., Weinberger N.M. Habituation produces frequency-specific plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 1991, 105:416-430.
15. Dean I., Harper N.S., McAlpine D. Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1684-1689.
16. Dhruv N.T., Tailby C., Sokol S.H., Lennie P. Multiple adaptable mechanisms early in the primate visual pathway. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:15016-15025.
17. Dragoi V., Sharma J., Miller E.K., Sur M. Dynamics of neuronal sensitivity in visual cortex and local feature discrimination. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:883-891.
18. Fairhall A.L., Lewen G.D., Bialek W., de Ruyter Van Steveninck R.R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 2001, 412:787-792.
19. Gardner J.L., Sun P., Waggoner R.A., Ueno K., Tanaka K., Cheng K. Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex. Neuron 2005, 47:607-620.
20. Grubb M.S., Thompson I.D. Quantitative characterization of visual response properties in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurophysiol. 2003, 90:3594-3607.
21. Harris K.D., Henze D.A., Csicsvari J., Hirase H., Buzsáki G. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J.Neurophysiol. 2000, 84:401-414.
22. Harris K.D., Hirase H., Leinekugel X., Henze D.A., Buzsáki G. Temporal interaction between single spikes and complex spike bursts in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neuron 2001, 32:141-149.
23. Hawken M.J., Parker A.J. Spatial properties of neurons in the monkey striate cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1987, 231:251-288.
24. Kara P., Pezaris J.S., Yurgenson S., Reid R.C. The spatial receptive field of thalamic inputs to single cortical simple cells revealed by the interaction of visual and electrical stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:16261-16266.
25. Kohn A. Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J.Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:3155-3164.
26. Kohn A., Movshon J.A. Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 2003, 39:681-691.
27. Kohn A., Movshon J.A. Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:764-772.
28. Krekelberg B., Boynton G.M., van Wezel R.J. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29:250-256.
29. Maravall M., Petersen R.S., Fairhall A.L., Arabzadeh E., Diamond M.E. Shifts in coding properties and maintenance of information transmission during adaptation in barrel cortex. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e19.
30. Movshon J.A., Lennie P. Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature 1979, 278:850-852.
31. Müller J.R., Metha A.B., Krauskopf J., Lennie P. Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science 1999, 285:1405-1408.
32. Nagel K.I., Doupe A.J. Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain. Neuron 2006, 51:845-859.
33. Niell C.M., Stryker M.P. Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 2008, 28:7520-7536.
34. Ohzawa I., Sclar G., Freeman R.D. Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex. Nature 1982, 298:266-268.
35. Paninski L. Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network 2004, 15:243-262.
36. Patterson C.A., Wissig S.C., Kohn A. Adaptation disrupts motion integration in the primate dorsal stream. Neuron 2014, 81:674-686. this issue.
37. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:437-442.
38. Pillow J.W. Likelihood-based modeling of neural responses. Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding 2007, 53-70. MIT Press, Cambridge. S.I.K. Doya, A. Pouget, R. Rao (Eds.).
39. Priebe N.J., Ferster D. Inhibition, spike threshold, and stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex. Neuron 2008, 57:482-497.
40. Rust N.C., Mante V., Simoncelli E.P., Movshon J.A. How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1421-1431.
41. Sanchez-Vives M.V., Nowak L.G., McCormick D.A. Membranemechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 invivo. J.Neurosci. 2000, 20:4267-4285.
42. Schmitzer-Torbert N., Jackson J., Henze D., Harris K., Redish A.D. Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings. Neuroscience 2005, 131:1-11.
43. Seriès P., Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Is the homunculus "aware" of sensory adaptation?. Neural Comput. 2009, 21:3271-3304.
44. Simoncelli E.P., Paninski L., Pillow J., Schwartz O. Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. Cognitive Neurosciences 2004, 327-338. MIT Press, Cambridge. Third Edition. M. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
45. Smirnakis S.M., Berry M.J., Warland D.K., Bialek W., Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 1997, 386:69-73.
46. Solomon S.G., White A.J., Martin P.R. Extraclassical receptive field properties of parvocellular, magnocellular, and koniocellular cells in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurosci. 2002, 22:338-349.
47. Solomon S.G., Peirce J.W., Dhruv N.T., Lennie P. Profound contrast adaptation early in the visual pathway. Neuron 2004, 42:155-162.
48. Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Visual motion aftereffects arise from a cascade of two isomorphic adaptation mechanisms. J.Vis. 2009, 9:1-14.
49. Ulanovsky N., Las L., Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:391-398.
50. Van den Bergh G., Zhang B., Arckens L., Chino Y.M. Receptive-field properties of V1 and V2 neurons in mice and macaque monkeys. J.Comp. Neurol. 2010, 518:2051-2070.
51. Wark B., Lundstrom B.N., Fairhall A. Sensory adaptation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17:423-429.