Adaptation Disrupts Motion Integration in the Primate Dorsal Stream

Neuron

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 674-686

  Patterson, Carlyn A ^a   Wissig, Stephanie C ^a   Kohn, Adam ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; MACACA; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MIRROR NEURONS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84893502025     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adelson E.H., Movshon J.A. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 1982, 300:523-525.
2. Backus B.T., Oruç I. Illusory motion from change over time in the response to contrast and luminance. J.Vis. 2005, 5:1055-1069.
3. Barlow H., Foldiak P. Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex. The Computing Neuron 1989, 54-72. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham. R. Durbin, C. Miall, G. Mitchison (Eds.).
4. Basole A., White L.E., Fitzpatrick D. Mapping multiple features in the population response of visual cortex. Nature 2003, 423:986-990.
5. Beck C., Neumann H. Combining feature selection and integration-a neural model for MT motion selectivity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21254.
6. Benucci A., Saleem A.B., Carandini M. Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:724-729.
7. Born R.T., Bradley D.C. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28:157-189.
8. Burke D., Alais D., Wenderoth P. A role for a low level mechanism in determining plaid coherence. Vision Res. 1994, 34:3189-3196.
9. Cadieu C., Kouh M., Pasupathy A., Connor C.E., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. A model of V4 shape selectivity and invariance. J.Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:1733-1750.
10. Cavanaugh J.R., Bair W., Movshon J.A. Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. J.Neurophysiol. 2002, 88:2530-2546.
11. Delicato L.S., Derrington A.M. Coherent motion perception fails at low contrast. Vision Res. 2005, 45:2310-2320.
12. Demb J.B. Functional circuitry of visual adaptation in the retina. J.Physiol. 2008, 586:4377-4384.
13. Dhruv N.T., Carandini M. Cascaded effects of spatial adapation in the early visual system. Neuron 2014, 81:529-535. this issue.
14. Dickinson J.E., Almeida R.A., Bell J., Badcock D.R. Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: a tilt aftereffect field. J.Vis. 2010, 10:5.
15. Dragoi V., Sharma J., Sur M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 2000, 28:287-298.
16. Dreher B., Burke W., Calford M.B. Cortical plasticity revealed by circumscribed retinal lesions or artificial scotomas. Prog. Brain Res. 2001, 134:217-246.
17. Fahle M., Poggio T. Perpeptual learning 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.
18. Flor H., Nikolajsen L., Staehelin Jensen T. Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7:873-881.
19. Graham N. Visual pattern analyzers 1989, Oxford, New York.
20. Hedges J.H., Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Optimal inference explains the perceptual coherence of visual motion stimuli. J.Vis. 2011, 11. 10.1167/11.6.14.
21. Hensch T.K. Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:877-888.
22. Hupé J.M., Rubin N. The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res. 2003, 43:531-548.
23. Jazayeri M., Wallisch P., Movshon J.A. Dynamics of macaque MT cell responses to grating triplets. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:8242-8253.
24. Kohn A. Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J.Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:3155-3164.
25. Kohn A., Movshon J.A. Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 2003, 39:681-691.
26. Kohn A., Movshon J.A. Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:764-772.
27. Krekelberg B., Boynton G.M., van Wezel R.J. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29:250-256.
28. Livingstone M.S., Pack C.C., Born R.T. Two-dimensional substructure of MT receptive fields. Neuron 2001, 30:781-793.
29. Lyon D.C., Nassi J.J., Callaway E.M. A disynaptic relay from superior colliculus to dorsal stream visual cortex in macaque monkey. Neuron 2010, 65:270-279.
30. Majaj N.J., Carandini M., Movshon J.A. Motion integration by neurons in macaque MT is local, not global. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:366-370.
31. Maunsell J.H., van Essen D.C. The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey. J.Neurosci. 1983, 3:2563-2586.
32. McLelland D., Baker P.M., Ahmed B., Bair W. Neuronal responses during and after the presentation of static visual stimuli in macaque primary visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:12619-12631.
33. Movshon J.A., Lennie P. Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature 1979, 278:850-852.
34. Movshon J.A., Newsome W.T. Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys. J.Neurosci. 1996, 16:7733-7741.
35. Movshon J.A., Adelson E.H., Gizzi G., Newsome W.T. Theanalysis of visual moving patterns. Pattern Recognition Mechanisms 1985, Springer, New York. C. Chagas, R. Gattass, C. Gross (Eds.).
36. Movshon J.A., Albright T.D., Stoner G.R., Majaj N.J., Smith M.A. Cortical responses to visual motion in alert and anesthetized monkeys. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:3. author reply 3-4.
37. Müller J.R., Metha A.B., Krauskopf J., Lennie P. Rapid adaptationin visual cortex to the structure of images. Science 1999, 285:1405-1408.
38. Nishimoto S., Gallant J.L. A three-dimensional spatiotemporal receptive field model explains responses of area MT neurons to naturalistic movies. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:14551-14564.
39. Pack C.C., Born R.T. Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain. Nature 2001, 409:1040-1042.
40. Pack C.C., Livingstone M.S., Duffy K.R., Born R.T. End-stopping and the aperture problem: two-dimensional motion signals in macaque V1. Neuron 2003, 39:671-680.
41. Patterson C.A., Wissig S.C., Kohn A. Distinct effects of brief and prolonged adaptation on orientation tuning in primary visual cortex. J.Neurosci. 2013, 33:532-543.
42. Patterson C.A., Duijnhouwer J., Wissig S.C., Krekelberg B., Kohn A. Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions. J.Neurophysiol. 2013, Published online December 26, 2013. 10.1152/jn.00030.2013.
43. Perrone J.A. A visual motion sensor based on the properties of V1 and MT neurons. Vision Res. 2004, 44:1733-1755.
44. Ponce C.R., Lomber S.G., Born R.T. Integrating motion and depth via parallel pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:216-223.
45. Priebe N.J., Ferster D. Inhibition, spike threshold, and stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex. Neuron 2008, 57:482-497.
46. Priebe N.J., Churchland M.M., Lisberger S.G. Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT. I. the role of input and intrinsic mechanisms. J.Neurophysiol. 2002, 88:354-369.
47. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:1019-1025.
48. Rodman H.R., Gross C.G., Albright T.D. Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal. J.Neurosci. 1989, 9:2033-2050.
49. Rust N.C., Mante V., Simoncelli E.P., Movshon J.A. How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1421-1431.
50. Sawamura H., Orban G.A., Vogels R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 2006, 49:307-318.
51. Sceniak M.P., Ringach D.L., Hawken M.J., Shapley R. Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:733-739.
52. Schwartz O., Hsu A., Dayan P. Space and time in visual context. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:522-535.
53. Seriès P., Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Is the homunculus "aware" of sensory adaptation?. Neural Comput. 2009, 21:3271-3304.
54. Simoncelli E.P., Heeger D.J. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vision Res. 1998, 38:743-761.
55. Smith A.T. Coherence of plaids comprising components of disparate spatial frequencies. Vision Res. 1992, 32:393-397.
56. Smith M.A., Majaj N.J., Movshon J.A. Dynamics of motion signaling by neurons in macaque area MT. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:220-228.
57. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D., Ramachandran V.S. Transparency and coherence in human motion perception. Nature 1990, 344:153-155.
58. Teich A.F., Qian N. Learning and adaptation in a recurrent model of V1 orientation selectivity. J.Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:2086-2100.
59. Thompson P. Velocity after-effects: the effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli. Vision Res. 1981, 21:337-345.
60. Tsui J.M., Hunter J.N., Born R.T., Pack C.C. The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration. J.Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:3123-3138.
61. van den Berg A.V., Noest A.J. Motion transparency and coherence in plaids: the role of end-stopped cells. Exp. Brain Res. 1993, 96:519-533.
62. Webb B.S., Dhruv N.T., Solomon S.G., Tailby C., Lennie P. Early and late mechanisms of surround suppression in striate cortex of macaque. J.Neurosci. 2005, 25:11666-11675.
63. Webster M.A. Adaptation and visual coding. J.Vis. 2011, 11:11.
64. Wissig S.C., Kohn A. The influence of surround suppression onadaptation effects in primary visual cortex. J.Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:3370-3384.
65. Xu H., Dayan P., Lipkin R.M., Qian N. Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. J.Neurosci. 2008, 28:3374-3383.
66. Xu H., Liu P., Dayan P., Qian N. Multi-level visual adaptation: dissociating curvature and facial-expression aftereffects produced by the same adapting stimuli. Vision Res. 2012, 72:42-53.