Acoustic droplet vaporization is initiated by superharmonic focusing

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Shpak, Oleksandr ^a   Verweij, Martin ^b   Vos, Hendrik J ^b,c   De Jong, Nico ^b,c   Lohse, Detlef ^a   Versluis, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUOROCARBON;

ACOUSTIC DROPLET VAPORIZATION; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; CAMERA; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; IMAGING; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND; VAPORIZATION; VELOCITY;

ACOUSTICS; FLUOROCARBONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OPTICAL PHENOMENA; PRESSURE; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 84893447195     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1312171111     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Duncan R (2003) The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2(5): 347-360.
2. Ferrari M (2005) Cancer nanotechnology: Opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5(3):161-171.
3. Torchilin VP (2005) Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4(2):145-160.
4. Davis ME, Chen Z, Shin D (2008) Nanoparticle therapeutics: An emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(9):771-782.
5. Rapoport N, Kennedy A, Shea J, Scaife C, Nam KH (2009) Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J Contr Rel 138(3):268-276.
6. Sheeran P, Dayton P (2012) Phase-change contrast agents for imaging and therapy. Curr Pharm Des 18(15):2152-2165.
7. Kripfgans OD, Fowlkes JB, Miller DL, Eldevik OP, Carson PL (2000) Acoustic droplet vaporization for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 26(7): 1177-1189.
8. Wang C, et al. (2012) Aptamer-conjugated and drug-loaded acoustic droplets for ultrasound theranosis. Biomaterials 33(6):1939-1947.
9. Fabiilli M, et al. (2010) Delivery of chlorambucil using an acoustically-triggered perfluoropentane emulsion. Ultrasound Med Biol 36(8):1364-1375.
10. Fang J, Hung C, Hua S, Hwang T (2009) Acoustically active pefluorocarbon nanoemulsions as drug delivery carriers for camptothecin: Drug release and cytoxicity against cancer cells. Ultrasonics 49(1):39-46.
11. Kripfgans OD, et al. (2005) Acoustic droplet vaporization for temporal and spatial control of tissue occlusion: A kidney study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 52(7):1101-1110.
12. Zhang M, et al. (2011) Acoustic droplet vaporization for enhancement of thermal ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound. Acad Radiol 18(9):1123-1132.
13. Rapoport NY, Gao Z, Kennedy A (2007) Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(14):1095-1106.
14. Mohan P, Rapoport N (2010) Doxorubicin as a molecular nanotheranostic agent: Effect of doxorubicin encapsulation in micelles or nanoemulsions on the ultrasoundmediated intracellular delivery and nuclear trafficking. Mol Pharm 7(6):1959-1973.
15. Couture O, et al. (2011) Ultrasound internal tattooing. Med Phys 38(2):1116-1123.
16. Apfel RE, Holland CK (1991) Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 17(2):179-185.
17. Williams R, et al. (2013) Characterization of submicron phase-change perfluorocarbon droplets for extravascular ultrasound imaging of cancer. Phys Med Biol 39(3):475-489.
18. Giesecke T, Hynynen K (2003) Ultrasound-mediated cavitation thresholds of liquid perfluorocarbon droplets in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 29(9):1359-1365.
19. Schad KC, Hynynen K (2010) In vitro characterization of perfluorocarbon droplets for focused ultrasound therapy. Phys Med Biol 55(17):4933-4947.
20. Martz TD, Sheeran PS, Bardin D, Lee AP, Dayton PA (2011) Precision manufacture of phase-change perfluorocarbon droplets using microfluidics. Ultrasound Med Biol 37(11):1952-1957.
21. Sheeran PS, Luois SH, Mullin LB, Matsunaga TO, Dayton PA (2012) Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons. Biomaterials 33(11):3262-3269.
22. Shpak O, et al. (2013) Ultrafast dynamics of the acoustic vaporization of phase-change microdroplets. J Acoust Soc Am 134(2):1610-1621.
23. Reznik N, et al. (2013) The efficiency and stability of bubble formation by acoustic vaporization of submicron perfluorocarbon droplets. Ultrasonics 53(7):1368-1376.
24. Shpak O, Stricker L, Versluis M, Lohse D (2013) The role of gas in ultrasonically driven vapor bubble growth. Phys Med Biol 58(8):2523-2535.
25. Blackstock DT (1964) On plane, spherical and cylindrical sound waves of finite amplitude in lossless fluids. J Acoust Soc Am 36(1):217-219.
26. Bacon DR (1984) Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 10(2):189-195.
27. Zabolotskaya EA, Khokhlov RV (1969) Quasi-plane waves in the nonlinear acoustics of confined beams. Sov. Phys. Acoust. 15:35-40.
28. Kuznetsov VP (1970) Equation of nonlinear acoustics. Sov. Phys. Acoust. 16:467-470.
29. Tjotta JN, Tjotta S, Vefring EH (1991) Effects of focusing on the nonlinear interaction between two collinear finite amplitude sound beams. J Acoust Soc Am89(3):1017-1027.
30. Lee D, Pierce A (1995) Parabolic equation development in recent decade. J Comput Acoust 3(2):95-173.
31. Hart TS, Hamilton MF (1988) Nonlinear effects in focused sound beams. J Acoust Soc Am 84(4):1488-1496.
32. Prosperetti A (2011) Advanced Mathematics for Applications (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
33. Chin CT, et al. (2003) Brandaris 128: A digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames. Rev Sci Instrum 74(12):5026-5034.
34. Gelderblom EC, et al. (2012) Brandaris 128 ultra-high-speed imaging facility: 10 years of operation, updates and enhanced features. Rev Sci Instrum 83(10):103706.
35. Szabo TL, Clougherty F, Grossman C (1999) Effects on nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters. Ultrasound Med Biol 18(1):33-42.
36. Lee YS, Hamilton MF (1995) Time-domain modeling of pulsed finite-amplitude sound beams. J Acoust Soc Am 97(2):906-917.
37. Vos HJ, Goertz DE, de Jong N (2010) Self-demodulation of high-frequency ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 127(3):1208-1217.
38. Fabiilli M, et al. (2009) The role of inertial cavitation in acoustic droplet vaporization. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 56(5):1006-1017.