The effect of ultraviolet-c irradiation via a bactericidal ultraviolet sterilizer on an anodized titanium implant: A study in rabbits

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 57-66

  Park, Kyou Hwa ^a   Koak, Jai Young ^a   Kim, Seong Kyun ^a   Han, Chong Hyun ^b   Heo, Seong Joo ^a  

^a BK 21 Plus   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anodic oxidation; Histomorphometry; Titanium irradiation; Ultraviolet C irradiation

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMAL; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RABBIT; RADIATION RESPONSE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WOUND HEALING; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

ANIMALS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; STERILIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84893378511     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2638     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous ja. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 16(suppl 1):7-127.
2. Morton D, Jaffin R, Weber HP Immediate restoration and loading of dental implants: Clinical consierations and protocols. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants 2004; 19(suppl):103-108.
3. Tarnow DP, Emtiaz S, Classi A. Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: Ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 319-324.
4. Ganeles J, Rosenberg MM, Holt RL, Reichman LH. Immediate loading of implants with fixed restorations in the completely edentulous mandible: Report of 27 patients from a private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 418-426.
5. Anderson E, Haanaes HR, Knutsen BM. Immediate loading of singletooth ITI implants in the anterior maxilla: A prospective 5-year pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 281-287.
6. Gatti C, Haeflinger W, Chiapasco M. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading. A prospective study of ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 383-388.
7. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(suppl):109-113.
8. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gesttorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through modification of microstructured titanium implant surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 323-334.
9. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinmann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 889-902.
10. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface topography for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 302-310.
11. Brunett DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of the cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 231-246.
12. Choi JW, Heo SJ, Koak JY, et al. Biological response of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 889-897.
13. 2 particles: A scanning electron microscope and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 195-207.
14. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Investigation of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 69-75.
15. Larsson C, Thompsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Eriksson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: Studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thickness and morphology. Biomaterials 1994; 15: 1062-1074.
16. Larsson C, Thompsen P, Aronsson BO, et al. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thickness. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 605-615.
17. Park KH, Heo SJ, Koak JY, et al. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implant under different current voltages: A rabbit study. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 517-527.
18. Li LH, Kong YM, Kim HW, et al. Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2867-2875.
19. Lee JE, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SH, Han CH, Lee SJ. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 655-662.
20. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74: 49-58.
21. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 7: 329-345.
22. Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28: 1419-1425.
23. Eriksson C, Nygren H, Ohlson K. Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: Cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4759-4766.
24. Wang R, Kojima E, Fujishima A, et al. Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces. Nature 1997; 388: 431-432.
25. 2 surfaces. Surf Sci 1995; 339: 114-124.
26. 2(110) surface Surf Sci 1994; 302: 329-340.
27. 2(110):The extent of molecular versus dissociative adsorption. Surf Sci 1996; 355: 151-166.
28. 2(110) surfaces studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Surf Sci 1996:352-354,504-510s.
29. 2(110)(1X1). Dominant role of the photooxidation of absorbed hydrocarbons causing wetting by water droplets. J Phys Chem B 2005; 109: 15454-15462.
30. Aita H, Att W, Ueno T, et al. Ultraviolet-mediated photofunctionalization of titanium to promote human mesenchymal stem cell migration, attachment, proliferation and differentiation. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 3247-3257.
31. Aita H, Hori N, Takeuchi M, et al. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 1015-1025.
32. Kim MH, Lee SY, Kim MJ, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY. Effect of biomimetic deposition on anodized titanium surfaces (appendix). J Dent Res 2011; 90: 711-716.
33. Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK, Yang JM, Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 72: 296-305.
34. Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 683-692.
35. Ogawa T, Sukotjo C, Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 241-247.
36. Park KH, Koak JY, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Wettability and cellular response of UV light irradiated anodized titanium surface. J Adv Prosthodont 2011; 3: 63-68.
37. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 38-45.
38. Cho YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SJ, Lee JH. Promotion of osseointegration of anodized titanium implants with a 1α,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3 submicron particle coating. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 1225-1232.
39. Han Y, Chen D, Sun J, Zhang Y, Xu K. UV-enhanced bioactivity and cell response of micro-arc oxidized titania coatings. Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 1518-1529.
40. Petzold C, Rubert M, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Monjo M. In vivo performance of titanium implants functionalized with eicosapentaenoic acid and UV irradiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 96A:83-92.
41. Rupp F, Haupt M, Klostremann H, et al. Multifunctional nature of UV-irradiated nanocrystalline anatase thin films for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 4566-4577.
42. Hori N, Ueno T, Suzuki T, et al. Ultraviolet light treatment for the restoration of age-related degradation of titanium bioactivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 49-62.
43. Att W, Hori N, Takeuchi M, et al. Time-dependent degradation of titanium osteoconductivity: An implication of biological aging to implant materials. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 5352-5363.
44. Suzuki T, Hori N, Att W, et al. Ultraviolet treatment overcomes time-related degrading bioactivity of titanium. Tissue Eng Part A 2009; 15: 3679-3688.
45. Harris LG, Patterson LM, Bacon C, Gwynn I, Richards G. Assessment of the cytocompatibility of different coated titanium surfaces to fibroblasts and osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 73: 12-20.
46. Tamura Y, Yokoyama A, Watari F, Kawasaki T. Surface properties and biocompatibility of nitrided titanium for abrasion resistant implant materials. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 355-372.