Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 889-897

  Choi, J W ^a   Heo, S J ^a   Koak, J Y ^a   Kim, S K ^a   Lim, Y J ^a   Kim, S H ^a   Lee, J B ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anodic oxidation; Histomorphometry; Removal torque; Titanium implant; Voltage

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; IMPLANT; MALE; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE;

ANIMALS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; FEMALE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 33751337585     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01669.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Kasemo B, Larsson K. The interface zone of inorganic implant in vivo; Titanium implants in bone. Ann Biomed Eng. 1983;11:1-27.
2. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Eriksson LE. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thickness and morphology. Biomaterials 1994;15:1062-1074.
3. Chun HJ, Park DN, Han CH, Heo SJ, Heo MS, Koak JY. Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:193-205.
4. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Aspect of surface physics on titanium implants. Swed Dent J. 1983;28(Suppl.):19-36.
5. Zitter H, Plenk HJ. The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as indicator of their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:881-896.
6. Solar RJ, Pollack SR, Korostoff E. In vitro corrosion testing of titanium surgical implant alloys: an approach to understanding titanium release from implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:217-250.
7. Tengvall P, Lindstrom I. Physico-chemical considerations of titanium as a biomaterial. Clin Mater. 1992;9:115-134.
8. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong YS, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behavior on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys. 2001;23:329-346.
9. Sundgren JE, Bodo P, Lundstrom I. Auger electron spectroscopic studies of the interface between human tissue and implants of titanium and stainless. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1986;110:9-20.
10. Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Hirsch JM, Thomsen P. Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48:559-568.
11. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wenneberg A, Heo SJ. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:349-356.
12. Yerokhin AL, Nie X, Leyland A, Matthews A, Dowey SJ. Plasma electrolysis for surface engineering. Surf Coating Tech. 1999;122:73-93.
13. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:65-72.
14. Schreckenbach JP, Marx G. Characterization of anodic spark-converted titanium surface for biomedical application. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1999;10:453-457.
15. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3893-3907.
16. Larsson C, Emanuelsson L. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants - studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thickness. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8:721-729.
17. Park KH. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants (thesis). Seoul Korea: Seoul National Univ.; 2003.
18. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, Krozer A, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002;23:491-501.
19. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Röser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12:1025-1031.
20. Thomsen P, Larsson C, Ericson L, Sennerby L, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B. Structure of the interface between rabbit cortical bone and implants of gold, zirconium and titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8:653-665.
21. Wennerberg A. The importance of surface roughness for implant incorporation. Int J Mach Tools Manufact. 1998;38:657-662.
22. Stenport VF, Johansson C, Heo SJ, Aspenberg P. Titanium implants and BMP-7 in bone: an experimental model in the rabbit. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:247-254.
23. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:349-359.
24. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:565-574.