Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bioceramic Molecular Impregnated and Dual Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces in the Human Posterior Maxilla

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 281-288

  Shibli, Jamil Awad ^a   Grassi, Sauro ^a   Piattelli, Adriano ^b   Pecora, Gabriele E ^c   Ferrari, Daniel S ^a   Onuma, Tatiana ^a   D'Avila, Susana ^a   Coelho, Paulo G ^d   Barros, Raquel ^e   Iezzi, Giovanna ^b  

^a GUARULHOS UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c Private Practice   (Italy)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Human histology; Implant surface topography nanostructure; Posterior maxilla; Surface

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; NANOMATERIAL;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; CERAMICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OSTEOCYTE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; AGED; BONE DENSITY; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CERAMICS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOCYTES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TORQUE;

EID: 78349289998     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00174.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. In: Lang NP, Karring T, Lindhe J, eds. Procedings of the 3rd European worshop on periodontology. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence Books, 1999:242-254.
2. Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:401-410.
3. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Bränemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:142-146.
4. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991; 62:2-4.
5. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25:889-902.
6. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:391-401.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson T, Andersson B, Krohl GG. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:24-30.
8. Shibli JA, Grassi S, De Figueiredo LC, etal. Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: a histological study in human jaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 80:377-385.
9. Grassi S, Piattelli A, De Figueiredo LC, etal. Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1736-1743.
10. Shibli JA, Grassi S, De Figueiredo LC, etal. Human peri-implant bone response to turned and oxidized titanium implants inserted and retrieved after 2 months. Implant Dent 2007; 16:252-259.
11. Grassi S, Piattelli A, Ferrari DS, etal. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone. J Oral Implantol 2007; 33:8-12.
12. Shibli JA, Feres M, De Figueiredo LC, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8:29-36.
13. Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Piattelli A, Coelho PG. Removal torque and histometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1942-1949.
14. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87:299-307.
15. Ogawa T, Saruwatari L, Takeuchi K, Aita H, Ohno N. Ti nano-nodular structuring for bone integration and regeneration. J Dent Res 2008; 87:751-756.
16. Meirelles L, Currie F, Jacobsson M, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:641-647.
17. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surface. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008. doi 10.1002/jbm.a.32126
18. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005; 310:1135-1138.
19. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001; 7:291-301.
20. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, McMurray RJ, Affrossman S, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. Interactions with nanoscale topography: Adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32196. [Epub ahead of print]
21. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Quaranta M. High-precision, cost-effective system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants. Biomaterials 1997; 18:577-579.
22. Kikuchi L, Park JY, Victor C, Davies JE. Platelet interactions with calcium-phosphate-coated surfaces. Biomaterials 2005; 26:5285-5295.
23. Davies J. Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 2007; 28:5058-5067.
24. Schneirder GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies. J Biomed Mater Res 2004; 64A:462-468.
25. Schneider GB, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M, etal. Implant surface roughness affect osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res 2003; 82:372-376.
26. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Early healing of nanothickness bioceramic coating on dental implants. An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31090. [Epub ahead of print]
27. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Cochran DL. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein syntesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29:389-401.
28. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:38-48.
29. Metz LN, Martin RB, Turner AS. Histomorphometric analysis of the effects of osteocyte density on osteonal morphology and remodelling. Bone 2003; 33:753-759.
30. Hernandez CJ, Majeska RJ, Schaffler MB. Osteocyte density in woven bone. Bone 2004; 35:1095-1099.
31. Cullinane DM. The role of osteocytes in bone regulation: mineral homeostasis versus mechanoreception. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2002; 2:242-244.