A hybrid architectural approach to understanding and appropriately generating indirect speech acts

Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1213-1219

  Briggs, Gordon ^a   Scheutz, Matthias ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT ROLES; ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH; ARTIFICIAL AGENTS; HYBRID APPROACH; NATURAL LANGUAGES; PHYSICAL ACTION; SOCIAL INFORMATION; SPEECH ACTS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84893350175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Allwood, J.; Traum, D.; and Jokinen, K. 2000. Cooperation, dialogue and ethics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53(6):871-914.
2. Blum, A. L., and Furst, M. L. 1995. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 90(1):1636-1642.
3. Briggs, G., and Scheutz, M. 2011. Facilitating mental modeling in collaborative human-robot interaction through adverbial cues. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference, 239-247. Portland, Oregon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., and Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and Semnatics, 3: Speech Acts.
5. Gupta, S.; Walker, M. A.; and Romano, D. M. 2007. How rude are you?: Evaluating politeness and affect in interaction. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Springer. 203-217.
6. Hassell, L.; Beecham, S.; and Christensen, M. 1996. Indirect speech acts and their use in three channels of communication. In In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Communication Modeling-The Language/Action Perspective.
7. Kelley, R.; Tavakkoli, A.; King, C.; Nicolescu, M.; Nicolescu, M.; and Bebis, G. 2008. Understanding human intentions via hidden markov models in autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, HRI '08, 367-374.
8. Kelley, R.; Wigand, L.; Hamilton, B.; Browne, K.; Nicolescu, M.; and Nicolescu, M. 2012. Deep networks for predicting human intent with respect to objects. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI '12, 171-172. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
9. Locher, M., and Watts, R. 2005. Politeness the ory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1):9-33.
10. Nass, C.; Steuer, J.; and Tauber, E. 1994. Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, 72-78. ACM.
11. Perrault, C. R., and Allen, J. F. 1980. A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts. Comput. Linguist. 6(3-4):167-182.
12. Scheutz, M.; Schermerhorn, P.; Kramer, J.; and Anderson, D. 2007. First steps toward natural human-like HRI. Autonomous Robots 22(4):411-423.
13. Searle, J. 1975. Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P., and Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and Semnatics, 3: Speech Acts.
14. Wilske, S., and Kruijff, G.-J. M. 2006. Service robots dealing with indirect speech acts. In IROS'06, 4698-4703.