Cooperation, dialogue and ethics

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 871-914

  Allwood, Jens ^a   Traum, David ^b,d   Jokinen, Kristiina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c Centre for Evolutionary Language Engineering   (Belgium)

^d University of Southern California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0034498089     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0425     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. AHLSEN, E. (1995). Pragmatics and aphasia. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 77. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
2. ALLEN, J. F. & PERRAULT, C. R. (1980). Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15, 143-178.
3. ALLWOOD, J. (1976). Linguistic communication as action and cooperation. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, Vol. 2. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
4. ALLWOOD, J. (1977a). A critical look at speech act theory. In Ö. DAHL, Ed. Logic, Pragmatics and Grammar, pp. 53-69. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
5. ALLWOOD, J. (1977e). Negation and the strength of presuppositions. In Ö. DAHL, Ed. Logic, Pragmatics and Grammar, pp. 11-52. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
6. ALLWOOD, J. (1978). On the analysis of communicative action. In M. BRENNER, Ed. The Structure of Action, pp. 168-191. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
7. ALLWOOD, J. (1980). On power in communication. In J. ALLWOOD & LJUNG, Eds. ALVAR - a festschrift to Alvar Ellegard. SPELL I, Department of English, University of Stockholm.
8. ALLWOOD, J. (1984). On relevance in spoken interaction. In G. KJELLMER & S. BÄCKMAN, Ed. Papers on Language and Literature, pp. 18-35. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
9. ALLWOOD, J. (1987). A semantic analysis of understanding. In V. ROSEN, Ed. Papers from the 10th Scandinvian Conference of Linguistics. Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Bergen, pp. 37-51.
10. ALLWOOD, J. (1988). Om del svenska systemet för språklig återkoppling. In P. LINELL, V. ADELSWÄRD, T. NILSSON & P. A. PETTERSSON, Eds. Svenskans Beskrivning 16, Vol. 1. (SIC 21a). University of Linköping, Tema Kommunikation, pp. 89-106.
11. ALLWOOD, J. (1992). On dialogue cohesion. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 65. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University. Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Roskilde.
12. ALLWOOD, J. (1994). Obligations and options in dialogue. Think Quartely, 3, 9-18.
13. ALLWOOD, J. (1995a). An activity-based approach to pragmatics. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 76. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
14. ALLWOOD, J. (1995b). Reasons for management in dialog. In R. J. BEUN, M. BAKER & M. REINER, Eds. Dialogue and Instruction, pp. 241-250. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. ALLWOOD, J. (1995c). Language communication and social activity. In K. JUNEFELT, Ed. Special Session on Activity Theory. Proceedings of the XIVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 73, pp. 17-39. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
16. ALLWOOD, J. (1997). Dialog as collective thinking. In P. PYLKKANEN, P. PYLKKO & A. HAUTAMÄKI, Eds. Brain, Mind and Physics. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
17. ALLWOOD, J. & HAGLUND, B. (1991). Communicative activity analysis of a Wizard of Oz-experiment. Technical Report PLUS Working Paper, Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
18. ALLWOOD, J., NIVRE, J. & AHLSEN, E. (1990). Speech management: on the non-written life of speech. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 58. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg. Also in Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 13.
19. ALLWOOD, J., NIVRE, J. A& AHLSEN, E. (1992). The semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics, 9, 1-26.
20. AXELROD, R. (1984). Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
21. AUSTIN, J. A. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press.
22. BALKANSKI, C. T. (1990). Modeling act-type relations in collaborative activity. Technical Report TR-23-90. Center for Research in Computing Technology, Harvard University.
23. BALLIM, A. & WILKS, Y. (1991). Artificial Believers. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. BLACK, W. J., BUNT, H. C., DOLS, F., DONZELLA, C., FERRARI, G., HAIDAN, R., IMLAH, W. G., JOKINEN, K., LAGER, T., LANCEL, J.-M., NIVRE, J., SABAH, G. & WACHTEL, T. (1991). A pragmatics-based language understanding system. Esprit Conference paper.
25. BRATMAN, M. (1987). Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
26. BUNT, H. (1990). DIT-dynamic interpretation in text and dialogue. In L. KALMAN & L. POLOS, Eds. Papers from the Second Symposium on Languages and Logic. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
27. CHU-CARROLL, J. (1996). Response generation in collaborative dialogue interactions. In S. LUPER-FOY, A. NIJHOLT & G. VELDHUIZEN VAN ZANTEN, Eds. Dialogue Management in Natural Language Processing Systems. Proceedings of the 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology, pp. 177-186. Twente.
28. CHU-CARROLL, J. & CARBERRY, S. (1998). Collaborative response generation in planning dialogs. Computational Linguistics, 24, 355-400.
29. CHU-CARROLL, J. & CARBERRY, S. (2000). Collaborative response generation in planning dialogs. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 969-1015.
30. CLARK, H. H. & MARSHALL C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. JOSHI, B. L. WEBBER & I. A. SAG, Eds. Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. CLARK, H. H. & SCHAEFER, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
32. CLARK, H. & WILKES-GIBBS, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
33. COHEN, P. R. & LEVESQUE, H. J. (1990a). Persistence, intention, and commitment. In P. R. COHEN, J. MORGAN & M. E. POLLACK, Eds. Intentions in Communication, pp. 33-69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. COHEN, P. R. & LEVESQUE, H. J. (1990b). Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In P. R. COHEN, J. MORGAN & M. E. POLLACK, Eds. Intentions in Communication, pp. 221-255. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. COHEN, P. R. & LEVESQUE, H. J. (1991). Teamwork. Noûs, 25, 487-512.
36. COHEN, P. R. & PERRAULT, C. R. (1979). Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 3, 177-212.
37. CUNNINGHAM, H., BLACK, W. J., UNDERWOOD, N. & JOKINEN, K. (1993). Dialogue management in a pragmatics-based natural language information system. In T. MCENERY C. D. PAICE, Eds. Proceedings of the British computer Society 14th Information Retrieval Colloquium. London: Springer-Verlag.
38. FERGUSON, G. & ALLEN, J. F. (1998). TRIPS: An intelligent integrated problem-solving assistant. Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), Madison, WI, 26-30 July, 1998, pp. 567-573.
39. GALLIERS, J. R. (1989). A theoretical framework for computer models of cooperative dialogue, acknowledging multi-agent conflict. Technical Report 172, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge.
40. GMYTRASIEWICZ, P. J. (1995). On rational reasoning about other agents. In M. FEHLING, Eds. Rational Agency: Concepts, Theories, Models, and Applications. Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium, pp. 68-74. Boston: MIT.
41. GRICE, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. COLE & J. L. MORGAN, Eds. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, pp. 43-58. New York: Academic Press.
42. GROSZ, B. J. & KRAUS, S. (1993). Collaborative plans for group activities. In Proceedings UCAI-93, pp. 367-373.
43. GROSZ, B. J. & KRAUS, S. (1996). Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86, 269-357. Also appears as Technical Report TR-20-95, Center for Research in Computing Technology, Harvard University.
44. GROSZ, B. J. & KRAUS, S. (1999). The evolution of Shared Plans. In A. RAO & M. WOOLDRIDGE, Eds. Foundations and Theories of Rational Agencies, pp. 227-262. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45. GROSZ, B. J. & SIDNER, C. L. (1986). Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175-204.
46. GROSZ, B. J. & SIDNER, C. L. (1990). Plans for discourse. In P. R. COHEN, J. MORGAN & M. E. POLLACK, Eds. Intentions in Communication, pp. 417-444. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. JENNINGS, N. (1999). Agent based computing: promise and perils. Proceedings of IJCAI-99, pp. 1429-1436. Stockholm.
48. JOKINEN, K. (1994). Response planning in information-seeking dialogues. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.
49. JOKINEN, K. (1995). Rational agency. In M. FEHLING, Ed. Rational Agency: Concepts, Theories, Models, and Applications. Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium, pp. 89-93. Boston: MIT.
50. JOKINEN, K. (1996a). Reasoning about coherent and cooperative system responses. In G. ADORNI and M. ZOCK, Eds. Trends in Natural Language Generation. An Artificial Intelligence Perspective, pp. 168-187. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
51. JOKINEN, K. (19966). Cooperative response planning in CDM. In S. LUPERFOY, and A. NIJHOLT and G. VELDHUIJZEN VAN ZANTEN, Eds. Dialogue Management in Natural Language Processing Systems. Proceedings of the 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology, pp. 159-168. Twente.
52. JOKINEN, K. (1996c). Goal formulation based on communicative principles. Proceedings of the 16th COLING, pp. 598-603. Copenhagen.
53. JOKINEN, K. (1997). Ideal cooperation in dialogues. Proceedings of the IJCAI '97 Workshop on Cooperation, Collaboration and Conflict in Dialogue Systems, pp. 53-57. Nagoya.
54. KOWTKO, J. & ISARD, S. (1991). Conversational games within dialog. Proceedings of the ESPRIT Workshop on discourse Coherence, University of Edinburgh, 4-6 April.
55. KROPOTKIN, P. (1902). Mutual Aid. London: Heinemann.
56. LEVESQUE, H. J., COHEN, P. R. & NUNES, J. H. T. (1990). On acting together. Proceedings of AAAI-90, pp. 94-99. Boston, MA.
57. LOCHBAUM, K. (1994). Using collaborative plans to model the intentional structure of discourse. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University. Available as Tech Report TR-25-94.
58. LOCHBAUM, K. (1998). A collaborative planning model of intentional structure. Computational Linguistics, 24, 525-572.
59. MCCARTHY, J. (1990). Ascribing mental qualities to machines. In J. MCCARTHY, Ed. Formalizing Common Sense. Ablex.
60. MCROY, S. (1995). Misunderstanding and the negotiation of meaning using abduction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 8, 2-3.
61. MCROY, S. W. & HIRST, G. (1995). The repair of speech act misunderstandings by abductive inference. Computational Linguistics, 21, 5-478.
62. MOESCHLER, J. (1989). Modélisation du dialog. Paris: Hermès.
63. POLLACK, M. (1990). Plans as complex mental attitudes. In P. R. COHEN, J. MORGAN & M. E. POLLACK, Eds. Intentions in Communication, pp. 77-103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. RAND, A. (1964). On the Virtue of Selfishness, a New Concept of Egoism. New American Library.
65. ROSCHELLE, J. & TEASLEY, S. (1995). The construction of snared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'MALLEY, Ed. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
66. SADEK, M. D. (1991). Dialogue acts are rational plans. Proceedings of the ESCA/ETR Workshop on Multi-modal Dialogue.
67. SADEK, M. D. (1994). Communication theory = rationality principles + communicative act models. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Planning for Interagent Communication.
68. SEARLE, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. SEARLE, J. R. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. R. COHEN, J. MORGAN & M. E. POLLACK, Eds. Intentions in Communication, pp. 401-415. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. SINCLAIR, J. & COULTHARD, R. M. (1975). Towards and Analysis of Discourse. The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
71. SCHEGLOFF, E. & SACKS, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
72. SPERBER, D. & WILSON, D. (1986). Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
73. STRAWSON, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320-344.
74. STRAWSON, P. F. (1964). Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria, XXX, 96-118.
75. TRAUM, D. R. (1994). A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester. Also available as TR 545, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
76. TRAUM, D. R. (1996). Conversational agency: the TRAINS-96 Dialogue Manager. In S. LUPER-FOY, A. NIJHOLT & G. VELDHUUZEN VAN ZANTEN, Eds. Dialogue Management in Natural Language Processing Systems. Proceedings of the 11th Twente Workshop on Language Technology, pp. 1-11. Twente.
77. TRAUM, D. R. (1997). A reactive-deliberative model of dialogue agency. In. P. MÜLLER, M. J. WOOLDRIDGE & N. R. JENNINGS, Eds. Intelligent Agents III-Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
78. TRAUM, D. R. & ALLEN, J. F. (1991). Causative forces in multi-agent planning. In. Y. DEMAZEAU & J. P. MULLER, Eds. Decentralized A.I.2., pp. 89-105. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
79. TRAUM, D. R. & ALLEN, J. F. (1992). A speech acts approach to grounding in conversation. Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-92).
80. TRAUM, D. R. & ALLEN, J. F. (1994). Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1-8.