Measurement properties of the German Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

Arthritis Care and Research

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 245-252

  Marks, Miriam ^a   Audigé, Laurent ^a   Herren, Daniel B ^a   Schindele, Stephan ^a   Nelissen, Rob G H H ^b   Vliet Vlieland, Thea P M ^b  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICHIGAN HAND OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TRAPEZIOMETACARPAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANALGESICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HAND JOINTS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; METACARPAL BONES; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SWITZERLAND; TIME FACTORS; TRAPEZOID BONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893342880     PISSN: 2151464X     EISSN: 21514658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22124     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kalichman L, Hernandez-Molina G,. Hand osteoarthritis: an epidemiological perspective. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010; 39: 465-76.
2. Wilder FV, Barrett JP, Farina EJ,. Joint-specific prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 953-7.
3. Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB,. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2614-8.
4. Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kvien TK, et al. Activity limitations and participation restrictions in women with hand osteoarthritis: patients' descriptions and associations between dimensions of functioning. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1633-8.
5. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, for the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-8.
6. Marks M, Schoones J, Kolling C, Herren D, Goldhahn J, Vliet Vlieland T,. Outcome measures and their measurement properties for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38: 822-38.
7. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA,. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23: 575-87.
8. Shauver MJ, Chung KC,. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 15 years of field trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 779e-87e.
9. Van der Giesen FJ, Nelissen RG, Arendzen JH, de Jong Z, Wolterbeek R, Vliet Vlieland TP,. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: Dutch language version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1121-6.
10. Oksuz C, Akel BS, Oskay D, Leblebicioglu G, Hayran KM,. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish population. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36: 486-92.
11. Knobloch K, Kuehn M, Papst S, Kraemer R, Vogt PM,. German standardized translation of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire for patient-related outcome measurement in Dupuytren's disease. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 39e-40e.
12. Roh YH, Yang BK, Noh JH, Baek GH, Song CH, Gong HS,. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36: 1497-503.
13. Pinho N, Rafael A, Cardoso A, Nardi AE,. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Bras Psiquiatr 2011; 60: 99-110.
14. Zyluk A, Piotuch B,. Use of questionnaires in outcome measurement in hand surgery. Chirurgia Narzadow Ruchu I Ortopedia Polska 2009; 74: 193-201. In Polish.
15. Huijsmans R, Sluiter H, Aufdemkampe G,. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Dutch language version: een vragenlijst voor patienten met handfunctieproblemen. Fysiopraxis 2001; 9: 38-41. In Dutch.
16. Waljee JF, Kim HM, Burns PB, Chung KC,. Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 208-20.
17. Knobloch K, Kraemer R, Papst S, Sorg H, Vogt PM,. German version of the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: implications for early quality of life following collagenase injection in Dupuytren's contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 886e-7e.
18. Waljee JF, Chung KC, Kim HM, Burns PB, Burke FD, Wilgis EF, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 1569-77.
19. Shauver MJ, Chung KC,. The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 509-14.
20. Massy-Westropp N, Krishnan J, Ahern M,. Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 1996-2001.
21. McMillan CR, Binhammer PA,. Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery. Hand (N Y) 2009; 4: 311-8.
22. Kotsis SV, Chung KC,. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 81-6.
23. Kotsis SV, Lau FH, Chung KC,. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32: 84-90.
24. Horng YS, Lin MC, Feng CT, Huang CH, Wu HC, Wang JD,. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 430-6.
25. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA,. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42: 619-22.
26. Van Rijn J, Gosens T,. A cemented surface replacement prosthesis in the basal thumb joint. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 572-9.
27. Burke NG, Walsh J, Moran CJ, Cousins G, Molony D, Kelly EP,. Patient-reported outcomes after Silastic replacement of the trapezium for osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 263-8.
28. University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Surgery. Scoring the MHQ. 2013. URL: http://sitemaker.umich.edu/mhq/scoring.
29. Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G,. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 2003; 62: 168-77.
30. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Sundaram M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker DM, et al. User's manual for the SF-12v2 Health Survey. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Incorporated; 2010.
31. Angst F, John M, Goldhahn J, Herren DB, Pap G, Aeschlimann A, et al. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after resection interposition arthroplasty of the thumb saddle joint. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 205-13.
32. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR,. How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 1043-51.
33. John M, Angst F, Awiszus F, Pap G, Macdermid JC, Simmen BR,. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE): cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008; 26: 1047-58.
34. MacDermid JC, Wessel J, Humphrey R, Ross D, Roth JH,. Validity of self-report measures of pain and disability for persons who have undergone arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 524-30.
35. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737-45.
36. De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL,. Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
37. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 22.
38. Mokkink LB,. COSMIN checklist. 2012. URL: http://www.cosmin.nl/the- cosmin-checklist-8-5.html.
39. Angst F,. The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 152.
40. Cohen J,. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-9.
41. De Vet HC, Terluin B, Knol DL, Roorda LD, Mokkink LB, Ostelo RW, et al. Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 37-45.
42. Fan J, Upadhye S, Worster A,. Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. CJEM 2006; 8: 19-20.
43. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
44. Michon M, Maheu E, Berenbaum F,. Assessing health-related quality of life in hand osteoarthritis: a literature review. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 921-8.
45. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J,. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 102-9.
46. Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR,. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33: 9-17.
47. University of Michigan, Medical School, Department of Surgery. BriefMHQ. 2013. URL: http://sitemaker.umich.edu/mhq/brief-mhq.
48. Myers HL, Thomas E, Hay EM, Dziedzic KS,. Hand assessment in older adults with musculoskeletal hand problems: a reliability study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 3.
49. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N,. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 222-6.
50. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, Buchbinder R, Hobby K, Roth JH, et al. Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 855-62.
51. MacDermid JC,. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther 1996; 9: 178-83.
52. Macey AC, Burke FD, Abbott K, Barton NJ, Bradbury E, Bradley A, et al, for the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. Outcomes of hand surgery. J Hand Surg Br 1995; 20: 841-55.