How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1043-1051

  Angst, Felix ^a,b,c   Goldhahn, Jörg ^a   Drerup, Susann ^a   Flury, Matthias ^a   Schwyzer, Hans Kaspar ^a   Simmen, Beat R ^a  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^b Rehaclinic Zurzach   (Switzerland)

^c NONE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Assessment; DASH; Function; Specificity; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARM INJURY; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND INJURY; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROC CURVE; SHOULDER INJURY; VALIDITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHOULDER; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ARM INJURIES; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HAND INJURIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SHOULDER JOINT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 70349230776     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9529-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. McConnell, S., Beaton, D. E., & Bombardier, C. (1999). The DASH outcome measure: A user's manual. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Work & Health.
2. M Offenbaecher T Ewert O Sangha G Stucki 2002 Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G) Journal of Rheumatology 29 401 402 11838867
3. P Hudack PC Amadio C Bombardier The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group 1996 Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand) American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29 602 608 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L (Pubitemid 26172396)
4. AS Dowrick BJ Gabbe OD Williamson PA Cameron 2005 Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: A review Injury 36 4 468 476 15755426 10.1016/j.injury.2004.06.014 (Pubitemid 40332328)
5. DE Beaton JN Katz AH Fossel JG Wright V Tarasuk 2001 Measuring the whole or parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity Journal of Hand Therapy 14 128 146 11382253 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M3psFOrsQ%3D%3D
6. DE Beaton RR Richards 1996 Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (America) 78A 882 890
7. DE Beaton RR Richards 1998 Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 7 565 572 9883415 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90002-7 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FpvFylug%3D%3D
8. SDM Bot CB Terwee DAWM van der Windt LM Bouter HCW de Vet 2004 Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A review of the literature Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 63 335 341 15020324 10.1136/ard.2003.007724 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7islersA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38453296)
9. F Angst G Pap AF Mannion DB Herren A Aeschlimann HK Schwyzer BR Simmen 2004 Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty. Usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measurement Arthritis and Rheumatism 51 5 819 828 15478159 10.1002/art.20688 (Pubitemid 39372042)
10. JN Doornberg D Ring LM Fabian L Malhotra D Zurakowski JB Jupiter 2005 Pain dominates measurement of elbow function and health status Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 87A 8 1725 1731 10.2106/JBJS.D.02745 (Pubitemid 41061190)
11. F Angst M John AF Mannion DB Herren A Aeschlimann HK Schwyzer BR Simmen 2005 Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty Arthritis and Rheumatism 53 1 73 82 15696556 10.1002/art.20911 (Pubitemid 40216355)
12. JC MacDermid RS Richards A Donner N Bellamy JH Roth 2000 Responsiveness of the short form 36, disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire, patient rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measures evaluating recovery after distal radius fracture Journal of Hand Surgery 25A 330 340
13. F Angst M John J Goldhahn DB Herren G Pap A Aeschlimann HK Schwyzer BR Simmen 2005 Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after resection interposition arthroplasty of the thumb saddle joint Arthritis and Rheumatism 53 2 205 213 15818645 10.1002/art.21085 (Pubitemid 40530160)
14. F Angst J Goldhahn S Drerup A Aeschlimann HK Schwyzer BR Simmen 2008 Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty Arthritis and Rheumatism 59 3 391 398 18311752 10.1002/art.23318
15. DE Beaton JG Wright JN Katz the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group 2005 Development of QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 87-A 5 1038 1046 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060 (Pubitemid 40617572)
16. Gummesson, C., Ward, M. M., & Atroshi, I. (2006). The shortened disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Muculoskel Dis, 7, 44. URL: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/7/44.
17. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2nd ed.). Lincoln, Rhode Island: QualityMetric Incorporated.
18. Ware, J. E., & Kosinski, M. (2004). SF-36 physical and mental summary scales: A manual for users of version 1 (2nd ed.). Lincoln, Rhode Island: QualityMetric Incorporated. (5th printing).
19. Bullinger, M., & Kirchberger, I. (1998). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
20. KE Roach E Budiman-Mak N Songsiridej Y Lertrantanakul 1991 Development of a shoulder and pain disability index Arthritis Care & Research 4 143 149 10.1002/art.1790040403 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jslymtg%3D%3D
21. F Angst J Goldhahn G Pap AF Mannion KE Roach D Siebertz S Drerup HK Schwyzer BR Simmen 2007 Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) Rheumatology (Oxford) 46 1 87 92 10.1093/rheumatology/kel040 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jis12iug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44932791)
22. JC MacDermid 2001 Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: Issues in instrument development and evaluation Journal of Hand Therapy 14 2 105 114 11382250 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3psFOrsg%3D%3D
23. M John F Angst G Pap A Junge AF Mannion 2007 Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the patient related elbow evaluation (PREE) for German speaking patients Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 25 2 195 205 17543142 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szjtF2gtQ%3D%3D
24. JC MacDermid T Turgeon RS Richards M Beadle JH Roth 1998 Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: A reliable an valid measurement tool Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 12 8 577 586 9840793 10.1097/00005131-199811000-00009 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlsVGhug%3D%3D
25. L Hemelaers F Angst J Goldhahn S Drerup JC MacDermid S Wood-Dauphinée 2008 Reliability and validity of the German version of the patient related wrist evaluation form (PRWE) in patients with acute distal radius fracture Journal of Elbow Hand Therapy 21 4 366 376 10.1197/j.jht.2008. 03.002
26. Rosner, B. (2000). Different significant tests. In B. Rosner (Ed.), Fundamentals of biostatistics (5th ed.). California: Duxbury (Thomson learning). pages 275,343,459.
27. KW Wyrwich FD Wolinsky 2000 Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 1 39 49 10807023 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000. 00238.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3msFejsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30182755)
28. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Homogeneity of the items. In D. L. Streiner & G. R. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed., pp. 68-73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Sachs, L. (1999). Significance tests of two correlation coefficients. In L. Sachs (Ed.), Angewandte Statistik. Anwendung statistischer Methoden. (Applied statistics. Application of statistical methods.) (9th ed., pp. 543-544). Berlin: Springer.
30. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Receiver operating characteristic curves, responsiveness. In D. L. Streiner & G. R. Norman (Eds.), Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed., pp. 119-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 198-199,209.
31. JA Hanley BJ McNeil 1982 The meaning and the use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 29 36 7063747 1:STN:280:DyaL387ltFyksQ%3D%3D
32. L Bessette O Sangha KM Kuntz RB Keller RA Lwe AH Fossle, et al. 1998 Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome Medical Care 36 491 502 9544589 10.1097/00005650-199804000-00005 1:STN:280: DyaK1c3gsVWntQ%3D%3D
33. LE Kazis JJ Anderson RF Meenan 1989 Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status Medical Care 27 Suppl. 3 178 189 10.1097/00005650-198903001- 00015
34. F Angst A Aeschlimann BA Michel G Stucki 2002 Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities Journal of Rheumatology 29 1 131 138 11824949
35. Abrahamson, J. H., & Abrahamson, Z. H. (2001). Measures of strength. In J. H. Abrahamson & Z. H. Abrahamson (Eds.), Making sense of data. A self-instruction manual on the interpretation of epidemiologic data (3rd ed., pp. 200-201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.