Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1121-1126

  van der Giesen, Florus J ^a   Nelissen, Rob G ^a   Arendzen, Johannes H ^a   de Jong, Zuzana ^a   Wolterbeek, Ron ^a   Vliet Vlieland, Theodora P ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disabled persons; Hand; Rehabilitation; Rheumatic diseases; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS IMPACT MEASUREMENT SCALES; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MICHIGAN HAND OUTCOME QUESTIONNAIRE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOLOGY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HAND DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 43949125498     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.033     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Maini R.N., and Feldman M. Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Maddison P.J., Isenberg D.A., Woo P., and Glass D.N. (Eds). Oxford textbook of rheumatology (1998), Oxford Med Publications, Oxford 65-81
2. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF (2001), WHO, Geneva
3. Stucki G., and Cieza A. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis: a way to specify functioning. Ann Rheum Dis 63 Suppl 2 (2004) ii40-ii45
4. Poole J.L. Measures of adult hand function. Arthritis Care Res 49 5 Suppl (2007) S95-S96
5. Poole J.L., Cordova K.J., and Brower L.M. Reliability and validity of a self-report of hand function in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Ther 19 (2006) 12-16 quiz
6. Chung K.C., Pillsbury M.S., Walters M.R., and Hayward R.A. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg [Am] 23 (1998) 575-587
7. Massy-Westropp N., Krishnan J., and Ahern M. Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 31 (2004) 1996-2001
8. Chung K.C., Hamill J.B., Walters M.R., and Hayward R.A. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg 42 (1999) 619-622
9. Chung K.C., and Wei F.C. An outcome study of thumb reconstruction using microvascular toe transfer. J Hand Surg [Am] 25 (2000) 651-658
10. Chung K.C., Kotsis S.V., and Kim H.M. A prospective outcomes study of Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the rheumatoid hand. J Hand Surg [Am] 29 (2004) 646-653
11. Kotsis S.V., and Chung K.C. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg [Am] 30 (2005) 81-86
12. Kotsis S.V., Lau F.H., and Chung K.C. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. J Hand Surg [Am] 32 (2007) 84-90
13. Huijsmans R., Sluiter H., and Aufdemkampe G. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version; een vragenlijst voor patienten met handfunctieproblemen. Fysiopraxis 9 (2001) 38-41
14. Tijhuis G.J., Zwinderman A.H., Hazes J.M., Van Den Hout W.B., Breedveld F.C., and Vliet Vlieland T.P. A randomized comparison of care provided by a clinical nurse specialist, an inpatient team, and a day patient team in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 47 (2002) 525-531
15. de Buck P.D., Breedveld J., van der Giesen F.J., and Vlieland T.P. A multidisciplinary job retention vocational rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic rheumatic diseases: patients' and occupational physicians' satisfaction. Ann Rheum Dis 63 (2004) 562-568
16. van der Giesen F.J., Nelissen R.G., Rozing P.M., et al. A multidisciplinary hand clinic for patients with rheumatic diseases: a pilot study. J Hand Ther 20 (2007) 251-260 quiz 261
17. Riemsma R.P., Taal E., Rasker J.J., Houtman P.M., Van Paassen H.C., and Wiegman O. Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 35 (1996) 755-760
18. van Lankveld W., van't Pad Bosch P., Bakker J., Terwindt S., Franssen M., and van Riel P. Sequential occupational dexterity assessment (SODA): a new test to measure hand disability. J Hand Ther 9 (1996) 27-32
19. van Lankveld W., van't Pad Bosch P., van der Schaaf D., Dapper M., de Waal Malefijt M., and van de Putte L. Evaluating hand surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: short-term effect on dexterity and pain and its relationship with patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg [Am] 25 (2000) 921-929
20. van Lankveld W.G., Graff M.J., and van 't Pad Bosch P.J. The Short Version of the Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment based on individual tasks' sensitivity to change. Arthritis Care Res 12 (1999) 417-424
21. Harkonen R, Harju R, Alaranta H. Accuracy of the Jamar dynamometer. J Hand Ther 199;6:259-62.
22. Mathiowetz V., Kashman N., Volland G., Weber K., Dowe M., and Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66 (1985) 69-74
23. Guyatt G., Walter S., and Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40 (1987) 171-178
24. Wanders A.J., Gorman J.D., Davis J.C., Landewe R.B., and van der Heijde D.M. Responsiveness and discriminative capacity of the assessments in ankylosing spondylitis disease-controlling antirheumatic therapy core set and other outcome measures in a trial of etanercept in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 51 (2004) 1-8
25. Liang M.H., Lew R.A., Stucki G., Fortin P.R., and Daltroy L. Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires. Med Care 40 4 Suppl (2002) II45-II51
26. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60 (2007) 34-42
27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
28. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Katz J.N., et al. Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology. minimal clinically important difference. J Rheumatol 28 (2001) 400-405
29. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Katz J.N., and Wright J.G. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 54 (2001) 1204-1217