Attitude change process toward ERP systems using the elaboration likelihood model

19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2013 - Hyperconnected World: Anything, Anywhere, Anytime

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 526-536

  Jung, Euisung ^a   Srite, Mark ^a   Haseman, William D ^a   Jung, Eun Ju ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual processing mechanism; Elaboration Likelihood Model; Enterprise resource planning; IS adoption; IS education

Indexed keywords

CONTENT QUALITIES; ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODELS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS; EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION; INTERACTION EFFECT; IS ADOPTION; IS EDUCATIONS; MODERATING EFFECT;

DATA PROCESSING; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 84893287925     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, 411-423.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50,:2, 179-211.
3. Angst, C.M., and Agarwal, R. (2009) Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion, MIS quarterly, 33, 2, 339-370.
4. Bhattacherjee, A., and Sanford, C. (2006) Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model, MIS quarterly, 30, 4, 805-825.
5. Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G., and Lee, J.-N. (2005) Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate, MIS quarterly, 29, 1, 87-111.
6. Chaiken, S. (1980) Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion, Journal of personality and social psychology, 39, 5, 752-766.
7. Chen, S.-H., and Lee, K.-P. (2008) The Role of Personality Traits and Perceived Values in Persuasion: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective on Online Shopping, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 36, 10, 1379-1399.
8. CIO, Why ERP Systems Are More Important Than Ever, http://www.cio.com/article/177300/Why_ERP_Systems_Are_More_Important_Than_Ever
9. Computer Economics 2011, https://www.computereconomics.com/
10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warsaw, P. R. (1989) User acceptance of information technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 8, 982-1003.
11. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, 39-50.
13. Jaccard, J., and Wan, C.K. (1995) Measurement Error in the Analysis of Interaction Effects between Continuous Predictors Using Multiple Regression: Multiple Indicator and Structural Equation Approaches, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 2, 348-357.
14. Jensen, N. J., Fink, J., Møller, C., Rikhardsson, P. and Kræmmergaard, P. (2005) Issues in ERP Education Development - Evaluation of the Options Using Three Different Models, 2nd International Conference on Enterprise Systems and Accounting (ICESAcc'05) 11-12 July 2005, Thessaloniki, Greece.
15. Jöreskog, K.G., and Yang, F. (1996) Nonlinear Structural Equation Models: The Kenny-Judd Model with Interaction Effects, In G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Lindell, M. K. and Brandt, C. J. (2000) Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 3, 331-348.
17. Lindell, M. K. and Whitney, D. J. (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1, 114-121.
18. Mun, Y.Y., and Davis, F.D. (2003) Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition, Information Systems Research, 14, 2, 146-169.
19. Pavlou, P.A., and Fygenson, M. (2006) Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior, MIS quarterly, 30, 1, 115-143.
20. Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. (1981) Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 1, 20-24.
21. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag
22. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., and Goldman, R. (1981) Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion, Journal of personality and social psychology, 41, 5, 847-855.
23. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., and Schumann, D. (1983) Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement, Journal of consumer research, 10, 2, 135-146.
24. Ping Jr, R.A. (1996) Latent Variable Interaction and Quadratic Effect Estimation: A Two-Step Technique Using Structural Equation Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 1, 166-175.
25. Podsakoff and Organ (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12, 4, 531-544.
26. Rosemann, M., Scott, J., and Watson, E. (2000) Collaborative ERP Education: Experiences from a First Pilot, AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, 2055-2060.
27. Ray, S., Ow, T., and Kim, S.S. (2011) Security Assurance: How Online Service Providers Can Influence Security Control Perceptions and Gain Trust, Decision Sciences, 42, 2, 391-412.
28. Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L. (2000) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions, Contemporary educational psychology, 25, 1, 54-67.
29. Sussman, S.W., and Siegal, W.S. (2003) Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption, Information Systems Research, 14, 1, 47-65.
30. Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G., and Lai, R.Y.C. (1999) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage, Omega, 27, 1, 25-37.
31. Venkatesh, V., and Goyal, S. (2010) Expectation Disconfirmation and Technology Adoption: Polynomial Modeling and Response Surface Analysis, MIS quarterly, 34, 2, 281-303.
32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS quarterly, 27, 3, 425-478.
33. Zo, H., and Ramamurthy, K. (2009) Consumer Selection of E-Commerce Websites in a B2C Environment: A Discrete Decision Choice Model, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 39, 4, 819-839.
34. http://scn.sap.com/community/uac