ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 380-406

  Wolk, Michael J ^a   Bailey, Steven R ^a   Doherty, John U ^a   Douglas, Pamela S ^a   Hendel, Robert C ^a   Kramer, Christopher M ^a   Min, James K ^a   Patel, Manesh R ^a   Rosenbaum, Lisa ^a   Shaw, Leslee J ^a   Stainback, Raymond F ^a   Allen, Joseph M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria; appropriateness criteria; imaging; ischemic heart disease; multimodality; SIHD

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORE; DELPHI STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FAINTNESS; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART FAILURE; HEART REHABILITATION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HEART VENTRICLE EXTRASYSTOLE; HEART VENTRICLE TACHYCARDIA; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STABLE ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; ANGINA PECTORIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EXERCISE; FOLLOW UP; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RADIATION SAFETY; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ACCF APPROPRIATE USE CRITERIA; APPROPRIATENESS CRITERIA; IMAGING; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MULTIMODALITY; SIHD;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY OCCLUSION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PATIENT SAFETY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES; VASCULAR CALCIFICATION;

EID: 84893207610     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ABIM's Choosing Wisely: An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation. Available at: http://www.choosingwisely.org. Accessed January 1, 2013.
2. M.R. Patel, J.A. Spertus, and R.G. Brindis et al. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2005 1606 1613 (Pubitemid 41446204)
3. R.C. Hendel, M.R. Patel, and J.M. Allen et al. Appropriate use of cardiovascular technology: 2013 ACCF appropriate use criteria methodology update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2013 1305 1317
4. K. Fitch, S.J. Bernstein, and M.D. Aguilar et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual 2001 RAND Corporation Santa Monica, CA
5. The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. The IAC Echocardiography Standards. Available at: http://www.intersocietal.org/echo/main/standards.htm. Accessed June 9, 2013.
6. P.A. Pellikka, S.F. Nagueh, and A.A. Elhendy et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20 2007 1021 1041 (Pubitemid 47321932)
7. M.H. Picard, D. Adams, and S.M. Bierig et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24 2011 1 10
8. The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. Nuclear PET Standards. Available at: http://www.intersocietal.org/nuclear/main/standards.htm. Accessed March 15, 2012.
9. The American College of Radiology. Nuclear Medicine & PET Accreditation. Available at: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/ Nuclear-Med-PET. Accessed October 30, 2013.
10. C.L. Hansen, R.A. Goldstein, and O.O. Akinboboye et al. Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography J Nucl Cardiol 14 2007 e39 e60
11. T.A. Holly, B.G. Abbott, and M. Al-Mallah et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography J Nucl Cardiol 17 2010 941 973
12. The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. The IAC Standards and Guidelines for MRI Accreditation. Available at: http://www.intersocietal.org/ mri/main/mri-standards.htm. Accessed February 5, 2012.
13. The American College of Radiology. MRI Accreditation. Available at: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/MRI. Accessed October 30, 2013.
14. C.M. Kramer, J. Barkhausen, and S.D. Flamm et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10 2008 35
15. W.G. Hundley, D. Bluemke, and J.G. Bogaert et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11 2009 5
16. The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission. The IAC Standards and Guidelines for CT Accreditation. Available at: http://www.intersocietal.org/ct/ main/ct-standards.htm. Accessed January 18, 2012.
17. The American College of Radiology. Computed Tomography Accreditation. Available at: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/CT. Accessed October 30, 2013.
18. G.L. Raff, A. Abidov, and S. Achenbach et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 2009 122 136
19. S. Abbara, A. Arbab-Zadeh, and T.Q. Callister et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3 2009 190 204
20. S.S. Naidu, S.V. Rao, and J. Blankenship et al. Clinical expert consensus statement on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80 2012 456 464
21. The Accreditation for Cardiovascular Excellence. 2013 Cath/PCI Standards. Available at: http://www.cvexcel.org/Documents/CathPCIProcess.aspx. Accessed January 18, 2012.
22. C.E. Chambers, K.A. Fetterly, and R. Holzer et al. Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77 2011 546 556
23. P.S. Douglas, J.J. Carr, and M.D. Cerqueira et al. Developing an action plan for patient radiation safety in adult cardiovascular medicine: proceedings from the Duke University Clinical Research Institute/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Think Tank held on February 28, 2011 J Am Coll Cardiol March 15, 2012
24. S.S. Halliburton, S. Abbara, and M.Y. Chen et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5 2011 198 224
25. The AAPM Position Statement on Radiation Risks From Medical Imaging Procedures. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id= 318&type=pp¤t=true. Accessed January 20, 2013.
26. A.P. Morise, W.J. Haddad, and D. Beckner Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease Am J Med 102 1997 350 356 (Pubitemid 27249101)
27. D.B. Pryor, L. Shaw, and C.B. McCants et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease Ann Intern Med 118 1993 81 90
28. S.D. Fihn, J.M. Gardin, and J. Abrams et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/ SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 e44 e164
29. G.A. Diamond, and J.S. Forrester Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease N Engl J Med 300 1979 1350 1358 (Pubitemid 9198112)
30. D.B. Pryor, F.E. Harrell Jr., and K.L. Lee et al. Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease Am J Med 75 1983 771 780 (Pubitemid 13023284)
31. R.J. Gibbons, G.J. Balady, and J.T. Bricker et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) J Am Coll Cardiol 40 2002 1531 1540 (Pubitemid 35192881)
32. G.A. Diamond A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort J Am Coll Cardiol 1 1983 574 575 (Pubitemid 13063216)
33. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA 285 2001 2486 2497
34. G. Assmann, P. Cullen, and H. Schulte Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study Circulation 105 2002 310 315 (Pubitemid 34106178)
35. C.W. Yancy, M. Jessup, and B. Bozkurt et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 62 2013 e147 e239
36. D.P. Zipes, A.J. Camm, and M. Borggrefe et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 e247 e346
37. D.P. Zipes, and J. Jalife Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside 2000 Elsevier Philadelphia, PA
38. M. Bikkina, M.G. Larson, and D. Levy Prognostic implications of asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias: the Framingham Heart Study Ann Intern Med 117 1992 990 996
39. A. Moya, R. Sutton, and F. Ammirati et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009) Eur Heart J 30 2009 2631 2671
40. L.A. Fleisher, J.A. Beckman, and K.A. Brown et al. 2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery J Am Coll Cardiol 54 2009 e13 e118
41. L. Campeau Letter: grading of angina pectoris Circulation 54 1976 522 523
42. R.C. Hendel, M.R. Patel, and C.M. Kramer et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 1475 1497
43. A.J. Taylor, M. Cerqueira, and J.M. Hodgson et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 1864 1894
44. P.S. Douglas, M.J. Garcia, and D.E. Haines et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/ HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 1126 1166
45. R.C. Hendel, D.S. Berman, and M.F. Di Carli et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/ SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 2201 2229
46. K.R. Nandalur, B.A. Dwamena, and A.F. Choudhri et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 50 2007 1343 1353 (Pubitemid 47449733)
47. M. Hamon, G. Fau, and G. Nee et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12 2010 29
48. J. Schwitter, C.M. Wacker, and N. Wilke et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial Eur Heart J 34 2013 775 781
49. J.P. Greenwood, N. Maredia, and J.F. Younger et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial Lancet 379 2012 453 460
50. M. Lipinski, C. McVey, and J. Berger et al. Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 62 2013 826 838
51. A. Kapetanopoulos, G.V. Heller, and H.P. Selker et al. Acute resting myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Emergency Room Assessment of Sestamibi for Evaluation of Chest Pain (ERASE Chest Pain) trial J Nucl Cardiol 11 2004 570 577 (Pubitemid 39341802)
52. K.M. Chinnaiyan, P. Peyser, and T. Goraya et al. Impact of a continuous quality improvement initiative on appropriate use of coronary computed tomography angiography. Results from a multicenter, statewide registry, the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 1185 1191
53. K.M. Chinnaiyan, G.L. Raff, and T. Goraya et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography after stress testing: results from a multicenter, statewide registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium) J Am Coll Cardiol 59 2012 688 695
54. L.J. Shaw, J. Hausleiter, and S. Achenbach et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2103 2114
55. L.J. Shaw, J.H. Mieres, and R.H. Hendel et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial Circulation 124 2011 1239 1249
56. J.H. Mieres, L.J. Shaw, and A. Arai et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association Circulation 111 2005 682 696 (Pubitemid 40216498)
57. P. Kohli, and M. Gulati Exercise stress testing in women: going back to the basics Circulation 122 2010 2570 2580
58. The Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE). Duke University. ClinicalTrials.gov website. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01174550?term=promise&rank=8. Accessed February 18, 2013.
59. The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA). New York University School of Medicine. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01471522?term= ischemia&rank=1. Accessed December 15, 2012.
60. H.I. Litt, C. Gatsonis, and B. Snyder et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med 366 2012 1393 1403
61. U. Hoffmann, Q.A. Truong, and D.A. Schoenfeld et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain N Engl J Med 367 2012 299 308
62. J.A. Goldstein, K.M. Chinnaiyan, and A. Abidov et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 58 2011 1414 1422
63. F. Nabi, S.M. Chang, and J. Xu et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain: the value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department J Nucl Cardiol 19 2012 233 243