MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial perfusion assessment in coronary artery disease trial: Perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: A comparative multicentre, multivendor trial

European Heart Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 775-781

  Schwitter, Juerg ^a   Wacker, Christian M ^b   Wilke, Norbert ^c   Al Saadi, Nidal ^d   Sauer, Ekkehart ^e   Huettle, Kalman ^f   Schönberg, Stefan O ^g   Luchner, Andreas ^h   Strohm, Oliver ⁱ   Ahlstrom, Hakan ^j   Dill, Thorsten ^k   Hoebel, Nadja ^l   Simor, Tamas ^m  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d FRANZ VOLHARD CLINIC   (Germany)

^e Landstuhl Hospital   (Germany)

^f SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

ⁱ St Gertrauden Hospital   (Germany)

^j UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^k KERCKHOFF HEART CENTER   (Germany)

^l GE HEALTHCARE   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

more..

Author keywords

Coronary disease; Ischaemia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion; Scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 84874876698     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: 15229645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs022     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Heart disease and stroke statistics: update 2009. Circulation 2009;119:e21-e181.
2. Allender S, Scarborough P, Peto V, Rayner M, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics - 2008 Edition. European Heart Network, www.ehnheart.org/cdv-statistics.html: 1-112.
3. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 57-62.
4. Smith SJ, Feldman T, Hirshfeld JJ, Jacobs A, Kern M, King S III, Morrison D, O'Neill W, Schaff H, Whitlow P, Williams D. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guidelines update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006;113:e166-e286.
5. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles F, Camici P, Colombo A, Hamm C, Jorgensen E, Marco J, Nordrehaug J-E, Ruzyllo W, Urban P, Stone G, Wijns W. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J 2005;26: 804-847.
6. Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Berman D, Marwick T, Lauer M, Heller G, Iskandrian A, Kesler K, Travin M, Lewin H, Hendel R, Borges-Neto S, Miller D. The economic consequence of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33: 661-669.
7. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, Marincek B, Luscher TF, von Schulthess GK. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103: 2230-2235.
8. Giang T, Nanz D, Coulden R, Friedrich M, Graves M, Al-Saadi N, Lu?scher T, von Schulthess G, Schwitter J. Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multicenter experience. Eur Heart J 2004;25: 1657-1665.
9. Schwitter J, Wacker C, van Rossum A, Lombardi M, Al-Saadi N, Ahlstrom H, Dill T, Larsson HB, Flamm S, Marquardt M, Johansson L. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29: 480-489.
10. Plein S, Kozerke S, Suerder D, Luescher TF, Greenwood JP, Boesiger P, Schwitter J. High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2008;29: 2148-2155.
11. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, Okinaka T, Isaka N, Nakano T, Takeda K. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003; 229: 209-216.
12. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnackenburg B, Wegscheider K, Fleck E. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108: 432-437.
13. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Klein C, Klimek W, Oswald H, Fleck E. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101: 1379-1383.
14. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kokocinski T, Kelle S, Manka R, Fleck E, Paetsch I. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 2007;115: 1769-1776.
15. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D, Dill T, Hombach V, Schulz-Menger J, Nagel E, Lombardi M, van Rossum A, Wagner A, Schwitter J, Senges J, Sabin G, Sechtem U, Mahrholdt H. EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54: 1457-1466.
16. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly T, Kim RJ. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361: 374-379.
17. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, FollansbeeW, Heller GV, Kiat H, Groch MW, Mahmarian JJ. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 1999;99: 2742-2749.
18. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1: American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3:G1-G46.
19. Piaggio G, Elbourne D, Altman D, Pocock S, Evans S, for the CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. J Am Med Assoc 2006;295: 1152-1160.
20. Greenwood J, Maredia N, Radjenovic A, Brown J, Nixon J, Farrin A, Dickinson C, Younger J, Ridgway J, Sculpher M, Ball S, Plein S. Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: the CE MARC study. Lancet 2011; doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4.
21. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D, Pilz G, Lombardi M, Sinha A, Wagner A, Dill T, Frank H, van Rossum A, Schwitter J, Nagel E, Senges J, Sabin G, Sechtem U, Mahrholdt H. Acute adverse reactions to gadolinium based contrast agents in cardiovascular MR. Multicenter experience with 17767 patients from the EuroCMR registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovascular Imaging 2011 (in press).
22. Gerber T, Carr J, Arai A, Dixon R, Ferrari V, Gomes A, Heller G, McCollough C, McNitt-Gray M, Mettler F, Mieres J, Morin R, Yester M. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging. Circulation 2009;119: 1056-1065.