Experimental evaluation of a coplanar airborne separation display

IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 290-301

  Ellerbroek, Joost ^a   Brantegem, Koen C R ^a   Rene Van Paassen, M M ^a   De Gelder, Nico ^b   Mulder, Max ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL AEROSPACE LABORATORY NLR   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Airborne separation assistance system (ASAS); Ecological interface design (EID); Evaluation experiment; Selfseparation; Situation awareness (SA)

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE SEPARATION ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS; ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN; EVALUATION EXPERIMENTS; SELF SEPARATIONS; SITUATION AWARENESS;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; SPEED CONTROL;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84893035270     PISSN: 21682291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2013.2238925     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. J. Ellerbroek, K. C. R. Brantegem, M. M. van Paassen, and M. Mulder, "Design of a co-planar airborne separation display," IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., vol. 43, no. 3, May 2013.
2. S. B. J. van Dam, M. Mulder, and M. M. van Paassen, "Ecological interface design of a tactical airborne separation assistance tool," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1221-1233, Nov. 2008.
3. F. M. Heylen, S. B. J. van Dam, M. Mulder, and M. M. van Paassen, "Design and evaluation of a vertical separation assistance display," in Proc. AIAA Guid., Navigat., Control Conf. Exhib., Honolulu, HI, USA, Oct. 2008, pp. 3558-3563.
4. RTCA, "Airborne conflict management: Application description V2.5," Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep. RTCA SC-186, 2002.
5. SESAR Consortium, "SESAR definition phase D3: The ATM target concept," Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium, Tech. Rep. DLM-0612-001-02-00, 2007.
6. D. A. Norman, "The problem of automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not over-automation," Philosoph. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., vol. 327, pp. 585-593, 1990.
7. N. B. Sarter and D. D.Woods, "Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: Operational experiences with the flight management system," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 303-321, 1992.
8. G. Lintern, T.Waite, andD. A. Talleur, "Functional interface design for the modern aircraft cockpit," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 225-240, 1999.
9. A. M. Bisantz andA. R. Pritchett, "Measuring the fit between human judgments and automated alerting algorithms: A study of collision detection," Human Factors, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 266-280, 2003.
10. S. W. A. Dekker, "On the other side of promise: What shouldwe automate today?," in Human Factors in the Design of Civil Aircraft, D. Harris, Ed. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2004, pp. 141-155.
11. T. Inagaki, "Design of human-machine interactions in light of domaindependence of human-centered automation," Cognit. Technol. Work, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 161-167, 2006. (Pubitemid 44394671)
12. A. Q. Dao, S. Brandt, V. Battiste, K. P. Vu, T. Strybel, andW. W. Johnson, "The impact of automation assisted aircraft separation on situation awareness," in Proc. Symp. Human Interface, 2009, pp. 738-747.
13. C. Meckiff and P. Gibbs, "PHARE highly interactive problem solver," Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium, Tech. Rep. 273/94, Nov. 1994.
14. R. Azuma, H. Neely,M. Daily, and M. Correa, "Visualization of conflicts and resolutions in a free flight scenario," in Proc. IEEE Vis., Oct. 1999, pp. 433-436. (Pubitemid 30526264)
15. J. M. Hoekstra, R. N. H. W. van Gent, and R. C. J. Ruigrok, "Designing for safety: The free flight air traffic management concept," Rel. Eng. Syst. Safety, vol. 75, pp. 215-232, 2002. (Pubitemid 34040583)
16. R. Canton, M. Refai, W. W. Johnson, and V. Battiste, "Development and integration of human-centered conflict detection and resolution tools for airborne autonomous operations," in Proc. Int. Symp. Aviat. Psychol., 2005, pp. 115-120.
17. J. Ellerbroek, M. Visser, S. B. J. van Dam, M. Mulder, and M. M. van Paassen, "Design of an airborne three-dimensional separation assistance display," IEEE Trans. Syst.,Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 863-875, Sep. 2011.
18. J. Ellerbroek, M. M. van Paassen, and M. Mulder, "Evaluating implicit coordination in manual airborne separation," in preparation.
19. RTCA, "Minimal operational performance standards for traffic alert and collision avoidance system 2 (TCAS2) airborne equipment," FederalAviation Administration,Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep. RTCA/DO-185B, 2002.
20. J. Uhlarik andD.A.Comerford, "Areviewof situation awareness literature relevant to pilot surveillance functions," Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep. DOT/FAA/AM-02/3, 2002.
21. M. R. Endsley, "Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems," Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32-64, 1995.
22. J. M. Flach, "Situation awareness: Proceed with caution," Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 149-157, 1995.
23. A. M. McGowan and S. P. Banbury, "Evaluating interruption-based techniques using embedded measures of driver anticipation," in Cognitive Approach Situation Awareness: Theory Application, S. P. Banbury and S. Tremblay, Eds. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2004, pp. 176-192.
24. D. Henderson, Applied Cartesian Tensors for Aerospace Simulations. J. A. Schetz, Ed. Washington, DC, USA: Amer. Inst. Aeron. Astron., 2006.
25. A. Nuic, D. Poles, and V. Mouillet, "BADA: An advanced aircraft performance model for present and future ATM systems," Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 850-866, 2010.
26. J. M. Hoekstra, "Designing for safety: The free flight air traffic management concept," Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty Technol., Policy, Manage., Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2001.
27. C. D. Wickens, J. Helleberg, and X. Xu, "Pilot maneuver choice and workload in free flight," Human Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 171-188, 2002. (Pubitemid 35315392)
28. A. L. Alexander, C. D. Wickens, and D. H. Merwin, "Perspective and coplanar cockpit displays of traffic information: Implications formaneuver choice, flight safety, and mental workload," Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., vol. 15, pp. 1-21, 2005. (Pubitemid 40166913)
29. C. Borst, M. Mulder, and M. M. van Paassen, "Design and simulator evaluation of an ecological synthetic vision display," J. Guid., Control Dyn., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1577-1591, 2010.
30. D. P. Hunt, "The concept of knowledge and how to measure it," J. Intell. Capital, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 100-113, 2003. (Pubitemid 36360014)
31. E. R. Tufte, Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT, USA: Graphics Press, 1990.
32. J. Rasmussen, "Skills, rules, knowledge; signals, signs, symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 257-266, May-Jun. 1983. (Pubitemid 13591183)
33. K. J. Vicente and J. Rasmussen, "Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 589-606, Jul.-Aug. 1992.
34. K. J. Vicente, Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.