Pattern of non-task interactions in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning courses

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 18-34

  Abedin, Babak ^a   Daneshgar, Farhad ^b,c   D'Ambra, John ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c BANGKOK UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL); content analysis; non task interactions; online pattern; Text Analysis Tool

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893009683     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2011.641676     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., D'Ambra, J. (2010). Students' communicative behavior adaptability in CSCL environments. Education and Information Technologies,doi: 10.1007/s10639-009-9116-x
2. Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., De-Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (2009). Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products. Dordrecht: Springer.
3. Chiu, C.-H., Hsiao, H.-F. (2010). Group differences in computer supported collaborative learning: Evidence from patterns of Taiwanese students' online communication. Computers & Education, 54, 427-435. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.026
4. Daneshgar, F., Kwast, E.-v.-d. (2005, January). An awareness provisioning methodology for asynchronous virtual global forums. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 6,
5. DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E. (2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 3(6), 920-940. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279815
6. Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., Broers, N. J. (2007). Students experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 496-514. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.021
7. Fahy, P. J. (2001). Addressing some common problems in transcript analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(2), 1-6.
8. Fahy, P. (2003). Indicators of support in online interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1-16.
9. Fahy, P., Crawford, G., Ally, M. (2001). Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1),
10. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
11. Hakkinen, P. (2004). What makes learning and understanding in virtual teams so difficult?. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 201-208. doi: 10.1089/109493104323024465
12. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152. doi: 10.1023/A:1003764722829
13. Henri, F. (1992). Computer-mediated humor and ethos: Exploring threads of constitutive laughter in online communities. In KayeA. R. (Ed.), Computers and Composition, (pp. 117-136). London: Springer-Verlag.Computer conferencing and content analysis, Collaborative learning through computer conferencing, The Najadan Papers
14. Hübler, M. T., Bell, D. C. (2003). 20, 277-294.
15. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
16. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., Buuren, V. H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 155-172. doi: 10.1089/109493104323024429
17. Mahdizadeh, H., Biemans, H., Mulder, M. (2008). Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Computers & Education, 51(1), 142-154. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.004
18. McNeil, S. G., Robin, B. R., Miller, R. M. (2000). Facilitating interaction, communication and collaboration in online courses. Computers & Geosciences, 26, 699-708. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00106-5
19. Muilenburga, L. Y., Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48. doi: 10.1080/01587910500081269
20. Naidu, S., Järvelä, S. (2006). Analyzing CMC content for what?. Computers & Education, 46, 96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.001
21. Salmon, G. (2002). Mirror, mirror, on my screen... Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 379-391. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00275
22. Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., MacDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners' perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3),
23. Veerman, A., Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001). The social dimension of synchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks:Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education, Paper presented at the Euro CSCL 2001
24. Wegerif, R. The social dimension of synchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, (1998) 2(1), 34-49.
25. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
26. WeverB. D., SchellensT., ValckeM., KeerH. V.Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review, Computers & Education 2006 (46) 628 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005