Novel chemically modified bacterial cellulose nanocomposite as potential biomaterial for stem cell therapy applications

Current Stem Cell Research and Therapy

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 117-123

  Acasigua, Gerson Arisoly Xavier ^a   de Olyveira, Gabriel Molina ^b   Costa, Ligia Maria Manzine ^c   Braghirolli, Daikelly Iglesias ^a   Fossati, Anna Christina Medeiros ^a   Guastaldi, Antonio Carlos ^b   Pranke, Patricia ^a,d   Daltro, Gildásio de Cerqueira ^e   Basmaji, Pierre ^f  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC   (Brazil)

^d Stem Cell Research Institute   (Brazil)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^f Innovatec's Biotechnology Research and Development   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Cell viability study; Nanoskin ; Natural nanocomposites; Regenerative medicine; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE; DENTAL MATERIAL; GELATIN; HYALURONIC ACID; NANOCOMPOSITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BACTERIAL POLYSACCHARIDE; BIOMATERIAL; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELL SURFACE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; SYNTHESIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TOOTH PULP; CELL STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CULTURE MEDIUM; INOCULATION; MTT ASSAY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL- AND TISSUE-BASED THERAPY; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULOSE; GELATIN; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOCOMPOSITES; POLYSACCHARIDES, BACTERIAL; POROSITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84893003259     PISSN: 1574888X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1574888X08666131124135654     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Olyveira GM, Acasigua GA, Costa LM, et al. Human dental pulp stem cell behavior using natural nanotolith/bacterial cellulose scaffolds for regenerative medicine. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2013; 9: 1-8.
2. Olyveira GM, Costa, LMM, Basmaji P, Filho LX. Bacterial Nanocellulose for medicine regenerative. J Nanotech Eng Med 2011; 2(3): 34001-9.
3. Xavier Filho L, Olyveira GM, Basmaji P, Costa LM. Novel electrospun nanotholits/PHB scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2013; 13(7): 4715-9.
4. Costa LMM, Olyveira GM, Basmaji P, Filho LX. Bacterial cellulose towards functional medical materials. J Biomater Tissue Eng 2012; 2: 185-96.
5. Olyveira GM, Costa, LMM, Basmaji P. Physically Modified Bacterial Cellulose as Alternative Routes for Transdermal Drug Delivery. J. Biomater. Tissue Eng 2013; 2(3): 1-6.
6. Costa LMM, Olyveira GM, Basmaji P, Filho LX. Nanopores structure in electrospun bacterial cellulose. J Biomater Nanobiotech 2012; 3: 92-6.
7. Cherian BM, Olyveira GM, Costa LMM, Leão AL, Souza SF. Protein Based Polymer Nanocomposites for Regenerative Medicine. Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC Green Chemistry), Edited by John J Maya and Thomas Sabu, No. 17, Natural Polymers, Volume 2: Nanocomposites 2012; 255-93.
8. Gois PBP, Olyveira GM, Costa LMM, et al. Influence of symbioses culture between microorganisms/yeast strain on cellulose synthesis. Int Rev Biophys Chem 2013; 3(3): 48-54.
9. Kuijpers AJ, Engbers GHM, Krijgsveld J. Cross-Linking and characterization of gelatin matrices for biomedical applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2000; 11(3): 225-43.
10. Ponticiello MS, Schinagl RM, Kadiyala S. Gelatin based resorbable sponge as a carrier matrix for human mesenchymal stem cells in cartilage regeneration therapy. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52: 246-55.
11. Denlinger JL, Balazs EA. Replacement of the liquid vitreus with sodium hyaluronate in monkeys. I. Short-term evaluation. Exp Eye Res 1980; 31: 81-99.
12. Toole, B. P. Hyaluronan in morphogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2001; 12: 79-87.
13. Dee KC, Andersen TT, Bizios R. Design and function of novel osteoblast-adhesive peptides for chemical modification of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 371-7.
14. Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell, 1996, 84: 359-69.
15. Toole BP, Linsenmayer TF. Newer knowledge of skeletogenesis: macromolecular transitions in the extracellular matrix. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 129: 258-78.
16. Teixeira AI,. Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Responses of human keratocytes to micro-and nanostructured substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 2004; 71: 369-76.
17. Seo BM, Miura M, Gronthos S, et al. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet 2004; 364: 149-55.
18. Wang, HS, Hung, SC, Peng, ST, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the Wharton's jelly of the human umbilical cord. Stem Cells 2004; 22(7): 1330-7.
19. Bunting KD, Hawley RG. Integrative molecular and developmental biology of adult stem cells. Biol Cell 2003; 95: 563-78.
20. Nie L, Chen D, Yang Q, et al. Hydroxiapatite/poly-L-lactide nanocomposites coating improves the adherence and proliferation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells on porous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds. Materials lett 2013; 92: 25-8.
21. Lock J, Nguyen TY, Liu H. Nanophase hydroxiapatite and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composites promote human mesenchimal stem cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012; 23: 2543-52.
22. Han W, Zhao J, Tu M, Zeng R, Zha Z, Zhou C. Preparation and characterization of nanohydroxiapatite strengthening nanofibrous Poly(L-lactide) scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 2012; 128(3): 1332-8.
23. Hung HS, Tang CM, Lin CH, et al. Biocompatibility and favorable response of mesenchymal stem cells on fibronectin-gold nanocomposites. PLoS One 2013; 8(6): e65738.
24. Hild N, Fuhrer R, Mohn D, et al. Nanocomposites of high density polyethylene with amorphous calcium phosphate: in vitro biomineralization and cytocompatibility oh human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater 2012; 7: 054103-10.
25. Lü LX, Zhang XF, Wang YY, et al. Effects of hydroxyapatitecontaining composite nanofibers on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and bone regeneration in vivo. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 2013; 5: 319-30.
26. Zhou C, Shi Q, Guo W, et al. Electrospun Bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by cellulose nanocrystals reinforcing maleic anhydride grafted PLA. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013; 5: 3847-54.
27. Bae WJ, Min KS, Kim JJ, Kim JJ, Kim HW, Kim EC. Odontogenic responses of human dental pulp cells to collagen/nanobioactive glass nanocomposites. Dent Mater 2012; 28(12): 1271-9.
28. Miura M, Gronthos S, Zhao M, et al. SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100: 5807-12.
29. Costa LMM, Olyveira GM, Basmaji P, Filho LX. Bacterial Cellulose Towards Functional Green Composites Materials. J Bionanoscience 2011; 5: 167-72.
30. Bernardi L, Luisi SB, Fernandes R, et al. The isolation of stem cells from human deciduous teeth pulp is related to the physiological process of resorption. J Endod 2011; 37(7): 973-9.
31. Barbara PF,. Meyer TJ, Ratner MA. Contemporary Issues in Electron Transfer Research. J Phys Chem 1996; 100(31): 13148-68.
32. Dong, S. J. and Wang, B. Q. Electrochemical Biosensing in Extreme Environment. Electroanalysis 2002; 14: 7-16.
33. Gilardi, G and Fantuzzi, A. Manipulating redox systems: application to nanotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 2001; 19: 468-76.
34. Koyama M, Helbert W, Imai T, Sugiyama J, Henrissat B. Parallelup structure evidences the molecular directionality during biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 9091-5.
35. Cherian BM, Leão AL, Souza SF, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose for medical implants. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Advances in Natural Polymers, Advanced Structured Materials, Edited by S. Thomas, P. M. Visakh, A. P. Mathew, 2013; 337-359.
36. Zugenmaier, P. Conformation and packing of various crystalline cellulose fibers. Prog Polym Sci 2001; 26: 1341-417.
37. Zhbanko RG. Infrared Spectra of Cellulose and Its Derivates. Edited by B. I. Stepanov. Translated from the Russian by A. B. Densham. Consultants Bureau: New York 1966; 325-33.
38. Kacuráková M, Smith AC, Gidley MJ, Wilson RH. Molecular interactions in bacterial cellulose composites studied by 1D FT-IR and dynamic 2D FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 2012; 337: 1145-53.
39. Andrews KD, Hunt JA, Black RA. Effects of sterilisation method on surface topography and in-vitro cell behaviour of electrostatically spun scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1014-26.
40. Leong NL, Jiang J, Lu HH. Polymer-ceramic composite scaffold induces osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1: 2651-2654.
41. Saad B, Abouatta BS, Basha W, et al. Hypericum triquetrifolium-Derived Factors Downregulate the Production Levels of LPSInduced Nitric Oxide and Tumor Necrosis Factor-a in THP-1 Cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2008; 14: 1-7.
42. Williams SJ, Wang Q, Macgregor RR, Siahaan TJ, Stehno-Bittel L, Berkland C. Adhesion of Pancreatic Beta Cells to Biopolymer Films. Biopolymers 2009; 91(8): 676-85.
43. Qian L, Saltzman WM. Improving the expansion and neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through culture surface modification. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1331-7.
44. Kim HW, Song JH, Kim HE. Bioactive glass nanofiber-collagen nanocomposite as a novel bone regeneration matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 79: 698-705.
45. Six N, Tompkins K, Septier D, Veis A, Goldberg M. Recruitment and characterization of the cells involved in reparative dentin formation in the exposed rat molar pulp after implantation of amelogenin gene splice products A + 4 and A-4. Oral Biosci Med 2004; 1: 35-44.