Exhaustive comparison and classification of ligand-binding surfaces in proteins

Protein Science

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1379-1391

  Murakami, Yoichi ^a   Kinoshita, Kengo ^a   Kinjo, Akira R ^b   Nakamura, Haruki ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electrostatics potentials; Exhaustive comparison; Ligand binding site; Molecular surfaces; Protein ligand interactions

Indexed keywords

HYDROLASE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; LIGAND; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHORYLASE; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; LIGAND BINDING; PATSIM SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ELECTROSTATICS POTENTIALS; EXHAUSTIVE COMPARISON; LIGAND-BINDING SITE; MOLECULAR SURFACES; PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84892936477     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2329     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H, Markley JL (2007) The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): Ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D301-D303.
2. Pearl F, Todd AE, Bray JE, Martin AC, Salamov AA, Suwa M, Swindells MB, Thornton JM, Orengo CA (2000) Using the CATH domain database to assign structures and functions to the genome sequences. Biochem Soc Trans 28:269-275.
3. Devos D, Valencia A (2000) Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins 41:98-107.
4. Wilson CA, Kreychman J, Gerstein M (2000) Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: Quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. J Mol Biol 297:233-249.
5. Aloy P, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJ (2001) Automated structure-Based prediction of functional sites in proteins: Applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J Mol Biol 311:395-408.
6. Teichmann SA, Rison SC, Thornton JM, Riley M, Gough J, Chothia C (2001) The evolution and structural anatomy of the small molecule metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 311:693-708.
7. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2001) Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 307:1113-1143.
8. Ikura M, Ames JB (2006) Genetic polymorphism and protein conformational plasticity in the calmodulin superfamily: Two ways to promote multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:1159-1164.
9. Gifford JL, Walsh MP, Vogel HJ (2007) Structures and metal-Ion-Binding properties of the Ca21-Binding helixloop- helix EF-Hand motifs. Biochem J 405:199-221.
10. Campbell SJ, Gold ND, Jackson RM, Westhead DR (2003) Ligand binding: Functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:389-395.
11. Jones S, Thornton JM (2004) Searching for functional sites in protein structures. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:3-7.
12. Watson JD, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (2005) Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15:275-284.
13. Lee D, Redfern O, Orengo C (2007) Predicting protein function from sequence and structure. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 995-1005.
14. Rosen M, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R (1998) Molecular shape comparisons in searches for active sites and functional similarity. Protein Eng 11:263-277.
15. Schmitt S, Kuhn D, Klebe G (2002) A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. J Mol Biol 323:387-406.
16. Stark A, Sunyaev S, Russell RB (2003) A model for statistical significance of local similarities in structure. J Mol Biol 326:1307-1316.
17. Wangikar PP, Tendulkar AV, Ramya S, Mali DN, Sarawagi S (2003) Functional sites in protein families uncovered via an objective and automated graph theoretic approach. J Mol Biol 326:955-978.
18. Jambon M, Imberty A, Deleage G, Geourjon C (2003) A new bioinformatic approach to detect common 3D sites in protein structures. Proteins 52:137-145.
19. Yao H, Kristensen DM, Mihalek I, Sowa ME, Shaw C, Kimmel M, Kavraki L, Lichtarge O (2003) An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol 326:255-261.
20. Binkowski TA, Adamian L, Liang J (2003) Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. J Mol Biol 332:505-526.
21. Brakoulias A, Jackson RM (2004) Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in proteinnucleotide complexes: An automated all-Against-All structural comparison using geometric matching. Proteins 56:250-260.
22. Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ (2004) Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol 339:607-633.
23. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2005) Identification of the ligand binding sites on the molecular surface of proteins. Protein Sci 14:711-718.
24. Kinjo AR, Nakamura H (2007) Similarity search for local protein structures at atomic resolution by exploiting a database management system. Biophysics 3:75-84.
25. Sael L, Kihara D (2010) Binding ligand prediction for proteins using partial matching of local surface patches. Int J Mol Sci 11:5009-5026.
26. Tu H, Shi T (2013) Ligand binding site similarity identification based on chemical and geometric similarity. Protein J 32:373-385.
27. Lee HS, Im W (2012) Identification of ligand templates using local structure alignment for structure-Based drug design. J Chem Inf Model 52:2784-2795.
28. Kinoshita K, Murakami Y, Nakamura H (2007) eFseek: Prediction of the functional sites of proteins by searching for similar electrostatic potential and molecular surface shape. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W398-W402.
29. Kobayashi N, Go N (1997) A method to search for similar protein local structures at ligand binding sites and its application to adenine recognition. Eur Biophys J 26:135-144.
30. Kinoshita K, Sadanami K, Kidera A, Go N (1999) Structural motif of phosphate-Binding site common to various protein superfamilies: All-Against-All structural comparison of protein-Mononucleotide complexes. Protein Eng 12:11-14.
31. Gold ND, Jackson RM (2006) Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-Ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol 355:1112-1124.
32. Minai R, Matsuo Y, Onuki H, Hirota H (2008) Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-Binding sites and application for predicting protein-Drug interactions. Proteins 72:367-381.
33. Kinjo AR, Nakamura H (2009) Comprehensive structural classification of ligand-Binding motifs in proteins. Structure 17:234-246.
34. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2004) eF-Site and PDBjViewer: Database and viewer for protein functional sites. Bioinformatics 20:1329-1330.
35. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2003) Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-Site. Protein Sci 12:1589-1595.
36. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540.
37. Engh RA, Bossemeyer D (2002) Structural aspects of protein kinase control-Role of conformational flexibility. Pharmacol Ther 93:99-111.
38. Wierenga RK (2001) The TIM-Barrel fold: A versatile framework for efficient enzymes. FEBS Lett 492:193-198.
39. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM (1994) Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372:631-634.
40. Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) One fold with many functions: The evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J Mol Biol 321:741-765.
41. Osadchy M, Kolodny R (2011) Maps of protein structure space reveal a fundamental relationship between protein structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:12301-12306.
42. Smith LJ, Kahraman A, Thornton JM (2010) Heme proteins-Diversity in structural characteristics, function, and folding. Proteins 78:2349-2368.
43. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402.
44. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-410.
45. Rost B (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 12:85-94.
46. Magrane M, Consortium U (2011) UniProt knowledgebase: A hub of integrated protein data. Database (Oxford) 2011:bar009.
47. Dessailly BH, Lensink MF, Orengo CA, Wodak SJ (2008) LigASite-A database of biologically relevant binding sites in proteins with known apo-Structures. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D667-D673.
48. Kahraman A, Morris RJ, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (2007) Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. J Mol Biol 368:283-301.
49. Sillitoe I, Cuff AL, Dessailly BH, Dawson NL, Furnham N, Lee D, Lees JG, Lewis TE, Studer RA, Rentzsch R, Yeats C, Thornton JM, Orengo CA (2013) New functional families (FunFams) in CATH to improve the mapping of conserved functional sites to 3D structures. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D490-D498.
50. Handa N, Terada T, Kamewari Y, Hamana H, Tame JR, Park SY, Kinoshita K, Ota M, Nakamura H, Kuramitsu S, Shirouzu M, Yokoyam S (2003) Crystal structure of the conserved protein TT1542 from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Protein Sci 12:1621-1632.
51. McCarthy AA, Peterson NA, Knijff R, Baker EN (2004) Crystal structure of MshB from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a deacetylase involved in mycothiol biosynthesis. J Mol Biol 335:1131-1141.
52. Westbrook J, Ito N, Nakamura H, Henrick K, Berman HM (2005) PDBML: The representation of archival macromolecular structure data in XML. Bioinformatics 21:988-992.
53. Connolly ML (1993) The molecular surface package. J Mol Graph 11:139-141.
54. Nakamura H, Nishida S (1987) Numerical calculations of electrostatic potentials of protein-Solvent systems by the self consistent boundary method. J Phys Soc Jpn 56:1609-1622.
55. Fischer D, Lin SL, Wolfson HL, Nussinov R (1995) A geometry-Based suite of molecular docking processes. J Mol Biol 248:459-477.
56. Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. From computer vision to protein structure and association. In: S. Salzberg, D.B. Searls, S. Kasif, Ed. (1999) Computational methods in molecular biology. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp 313-334.
57. Wolfson HJ, Rigoutsos I (1997) Geometric hashing: An overview. Comp Sci Eng IEEE 4:10-21.