Effect of cardiac hybrid 15O-water PET/CT imaging on downstream referral for invasive coronary angiography and revascularization rate

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 170-179

  Danad, Ibrahim ^a   Raijmakers, Pieter G ^a   Harms, Hendrik J ^a   Van Kuijk, Cornelis ^a   Van Royen, Niels ^a   Diamant, Michaela ^a   Lammertsma, Adriaan A ^a   Lubberink, Mark ^b   Van Rossum, Albert C ^a   Knaapen, Paul ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

hybrid PET CT imaging; referral for invasive coronary angiography; revascularization rate

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN 15; WATER;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; HYBRID; HYBRID 15 OXYGEN WATER POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY BASED CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PET-CT SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT DURATION;

HYBRID PET/CT IMAGING; REFERRAL FOR INVASIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; REVASCULARIZATION RATE;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; OXYGEN RADIOISOTOPES; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WATER;

EID: 84892933851     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet125     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Shaw LJ, Marwick TH, Zoghbi WA, Hundley WG, Kramer CM, Achenbach S et al. Why all the focus on cardiac imaging? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:789-94.
2. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007;115:1464-80.
3. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA et al. Diagnostic accuracyof64-slice computedtomography coronary angiography:apro-spective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135-44.
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-32.
5. Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietila M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010; 122:603-13.
6. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508-14.
7. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR et al. Comprehensive assessment ofcoronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserveinpatients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:636-43.
8. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Veer M et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.
9. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, Koepfli P, Husmann L, Scheffel H et al. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology 2008;248:414-23.
10. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21.
11. 1 5O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2013;54:55-63.
12. Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Ghadri JR, Herzog BA, Kuest SM, Husmann L et al. Impact of cardiac hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging on choice of treatment strategy in coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2824-9.
13. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Wolfrum M, Kuest SM, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN et al. Downstream resourceutilization following hybrid cardiac imaging withanintegrated cadmium-zinc-telluride/64-slice CT device. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39: 430-6.
14. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8.
15. 15O-water and PET without attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2010;51:575-80.
16. 2O and a clinical PET/CT scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:930-9.
17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
18. Chareonthaitawee P, Kaufmann PA, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Heterogeneityofrestingand hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans. Cardiovasc Res 2001;50:151-61.
19. Muzik O, Duvernoy C, Beanlands RS, Sawada S, Dayanikli F, Wolfe ER Jr et al. Assessment of diagnostic performance of quantitative flow measurements in normal subjects and patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease by means of nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:534-40.
20. 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with post-stenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Circulation 1994;89:2150-60.
21. Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC, Reichek N. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:940-7.
22. 2O PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:102-12.
23. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2170-214.
24. Schenker MP, Dorbala S, Hong EC, Rybicki FJ, Hachamovitch R, Kwong RY et al. Interrelation of coronary calcification, myocardial ischemia, and outcomes in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease: a combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography study. Circulation 2008;117:1693-700.
25. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007;356:830-40.
26. Knaapen P, Camici PG, Marques KM, Nijveldt R, Bax JJ, Westerhof N et al. Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans. Basic Res Cardiol 2009;104:485-98.
27. Schindler TH, Cardenas J, Prior JO, Facta AD, Kreissl MC, Zhang XL et al. Relationship between increasing body weight, insulin resistance, inflammation, adipocyto-kine leptin, and coronary circulatory function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1188-95.
28. Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary patho-physiology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:193-202.
29. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362:886-95.
30. Hachamovitch R, Nutter B, Hlatky MA, Shaw LJ, Ridner ML, Dorbala S et al. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myo-cardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:462-74.
31. Maffei E, Seitun S, Martini C, Palumbo A, Tarantini G, Berti E et al. CT coronary angi-ography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Heart 2010;96:1973-9.
32. Cook S, Walker A, Hugli O, Togni M, Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:375-82.