EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND CURRICULAR DESIGN: PROMOTING MATHEMATICAL CREATIVITY FOR ALL STUDENTS

Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 101-113

  Yerushalmy, Michal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892869932     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087909352_008     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Ainsworth, S.E., Bibby, P.A., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Information technology and multiple representations: New opportunities-new problems. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 6 (1), 93-104.
2. Chazan, D., Callis, S., & Lehman, M. (2008). Embracing reason. New York: Routledge.
3. Dunham, P., & Hennessy, S. (2008). Equity and use of educational technology in mathematics. In K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology in the learning and teaching of mathematics: Syntheses and perspectives (pp.345-418). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
4. Goldenberg, P.E. (1999). Principles, arts, and craft in curriculum design: The case of connected geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 191-224.
5. Heid, M.K., & Blume, G.W. (2008). Technology and the development of algebraic understanding. In K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology in the learning and teaching of mathematics: Syntheses and perspectives (pp.55-108). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
6. Hershkowitz, R., Dreyfus, T., Ben-Zvi, D., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Resnick, T., et al. (2002). Mathematics curriculum development for computerized environments: A designer-researcher-teacher-learner activity. In L.D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp.656-694). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Klein, D. (2007). A quarter century of US 'math wars' and political partisanship. Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics. Volume 22, Issue 1, 22-33. Retrieved June 7/09 from http://www.csun.edu/~vcmth00m/bshm.html
8. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
9. Kozulin, A. (2001). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Harvard University Press.
10. Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996)."This is so:" A text on texts. In A.J.Bishop, K.Clements, C.Keitel, J.Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Part 1, pp.371-409). Boston: Kluwer.
11. Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of 'Investigation' (Studies in Mathematics Education). London: Falmer Press.
12. Nemirovsky, R., & S. Monk (2000)."If you look at it the other way": An exploration into the nature of symbolizing. In P.Cobb, E.Yackel, & K. McLain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Papert, S. (2000). What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39, 720-729.
14. Perkins, D.N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Perkins, D.N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Presmeg, N. (2003). Creativity, mathematizing and didactizing: Leen Streefland's work continues. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 127-137.
17. Roschelle, J., Patton, C., & Tatar, D. (2007). Designing networked handheld devices to enhance school learning. In M. Zelkowitz (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol 70, pp.1-60).
18. Schwartz, J.L. (1999). Can technology help us make mathematics curriculum intellectually stimulating and socially responsible? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 99-119.
19. Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20-36.
20. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
21. Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (1990). Overcoming visual obstacles with the aid of the supposer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 199-219.
22. Yerushalmy, M. (1999). Making exploration visible: On software design and school algebra curriculum. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 169-189.
23. Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (2001). Curricular approaches to school algebra as a means to cognitively flexible fluency with symbols and conceptual understanding. In K. Stacey & H. Shick (Eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth ICMI study conference: The future of the teaching and learning of school algebra (Vol 2., pp.668-675). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
24. Yerushalmy, M., Katriel, H., & Shternberg, B. (2002). VisualMath: The function web-book.www.cet.ac.il/math/function/english
25. Yerushalmy, M., & Weizman, A. (2007). Math4Mobile. Retrieved from http://www.math4mobile.com