Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies: Patent citation network

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 975-998

  Kim, Euiseok ^a   Cho, Yongrae ^a   Kim, Wonjoon ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Network analysis; Patent citation; Printed electronics; Technological convergence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892866130     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1104-7     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aistrup, B. (2009). Linking into the value chain for the printed electronics industry. Resource document. Future Print 2009. http://www. aistrupconsulting. com/Resources/LinkingIntoTheValueChain_PrintedElectronics. pdf. Accessed September 2009.
2. Bekkers, R., & Martinelli, A. (2012). Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 1192-1216.
3. Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2008). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Bores, C., Saurina, C., & Torres, R. (2003). Technological convergence: A strategic perspective. Technovation, 23, 1-13.
5. Buffat, Ph, & Borel, J.-P. (1976). Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles. Physical Review A, 13(6), 2287-2298.
6. Chang, J., Ge, T., & Sanchez, E. (2012). Challenges of printed electronics on flexible substrates. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 55th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), 582-585.
7. Cho, T., & Shih, H. (2011). Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997-2008. Scientometrics, 89(3), 795-811.
8. Érdi, P., Makovi, K., Somogyvári, Z., Strandburg, K., Tobochnik, J., Volf, P., & Zalányi, L. (2013). Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US Patent citation network. Scientometrics, 95, 225-242.
9. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25, 233-242.
10. European Commission. (2010). Focus Report 2010: Printed Electronics - ObservatoryNANO. Resource document. European Commission. http://www. observatorynano. eu/project/filesystem/files/ObservatoryNanoFocusReport_PrintedElectronics. pdf. Accessed April 2010.
11. Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 18, 311-336.
12. Garnier, F., Hajlaoui, R., Yassar, A., & Srivastava, P. (1994). All-polymer field-effect transistor realized by printing techniques. Science, 265(5179), 1684-1686.
13. Gay, B., & Dousset, B. (2005). Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 34(10), 1457-1475.
14. Gelsing, L. (1992). Innovation and the development of industrial networks. In B. Lundval (Ed.), National systems of innovation- towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Printer Pub. Ltd.
15. Grilliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistic as economic indicator: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
16. Grupp, H. (1990). The concept of entropy in scientometrics and innovation research. Scientometrics, 18(3-4), 219-239.
17. Harrop, P. (2012). Introduction to printed, organic and flexible electronics. Cambridge, MA: IDTechEX.
18. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
19. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119-127.
20. Huang, D., Liao, F., Molesa, S., Redinger, D., & Subramanian, V. (2003). Plastic-compatible low resistance printable gold nanoparticle conductors for flexible electronics. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 150(7), G412-G417.
21. Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507-527.
22. Igbenehi, H., & Das, R. (2012). Printed and flexible sensors 2012-2022: Forecasts, players, opportunities. Cambridge, MA: IDTechEx.
23. Iijima, S. (1991). Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature, 354(6348), 56-58.
24. Islam, N., & Miyazaki, K. (2009). Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 128-140.
25. Jacobson, J. (2001). The desktop fab. Communications of the ACM, 44(3), 41-43.
26. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Romer, P. M. (2005). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27. Kantola, V., Kulovesi, J., Lahti, L., Lin, R., Zavodchikova, M., & Coatanea, E. (2009). Printed electronics, now and future. In Y. Neuvo & S. Ylonen (Eds.), Bit bang-rays to the future. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.
28. Kodama, F. (1992). Technology fusion and the new R&D. Harvard Business Review, 70, 70-78.
29. Kodama, F. (1995). Emerging patterns of innovation: Sources of Japan's technological edge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
30. Kunnari, E., Valkama, J., Keskinen, M., & Mansikkamäki, P. (2009). Environmental evaluation of new technology: Printed electronics case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 791-799.
31. Lee, H., Kim, C., Cho, H., & Park, Y. (2009). An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 894-908.
32. Lee, D. H., Seo, I. W., Choe, H. C., & Kim, H. D. (2012). Collaboration network patterns and research performance: The case of Korean public research institutions. Scientometrics, 91, 925-942.
33. Leenen, M. A. M., Arning, V., Thiem, H., Steiger, J., & Anselmann, R. (2009). Printable electronics: Flexibility for the future. Physica Status Solidi A, 206(4), 588-597.
34. Lei, X. P., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D. Z., Huang, M. H., Zheng, J., et al. (2013). Technological collaboration patterns in solar cell industry based on patent inventors and assignees analysis. Scientometrics, 96, 427-441.
35. Mandelson, P. (2009). Plastic electronics: A UK strategy for success. Realising the UK potential. Resource document. BIS (Department for Business Innovation & Skills). http://bis. ecgroup. net/Publications/BusinessSectors/ElectronicsITServices/091462. aspx. Accessed 07 December 2009.
36. Martinelli, A. (2012). An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry. Research Policy, 41, 414-429.
37. Mihm, S. (2000). Print your next PC. MIT Technology Review, 103(6), 66-70.
38. Miyazaki, K., & Islam, N. (2007). Nanotechnology systems of innovation: An analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation, 27(11), 661-675.
39. No, H., & Park, Y. (2010). Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: Trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(1), 63-75.
40. OECD. (1993). Technological fusion: A path to innovation, the case of optoelectronics. Paris: Organization for Economics.
41. Park, Y., Yoon, B., & Lee, S. (2005). The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: Patent citation analysis. Technology in Society, 27(4), 471-485.
42. Perelaer, J., Smith, P. J., Mager, D., Soltman, D., Volkman, S. K., Subramanian, V., et al. (2010). Printed electronics: the challenges involved in printing devices, interconnects, and contacts based on inorganic materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 20, 8446-8453.
43. Porter, A., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719-745.
44. Ridley, B. A., Nivi, B., & Jacobson, J. M. (1999). All-inorganic field effect transistors fabricated by printing. Science, 286(5440), 746-749.
45. Robinson, A., & Miyazaki, K. (2013). Dynamics of scientific knowledge bases as proxies for discerning technological emergence-The case of MEMS/NEMS technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1071-1084.
46. Scott, J. (2003). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
47. Shin, J., & Park, Y. (2010). Evolutionary optimization of a technological knowledge network. Technovation, 30(11-12), 612-626.
48. Smith, P. J., Shin, D. Y., Stringer, J. E., & Derby, B. (2006). Direct ink-jet printing and low temperature conversion of conductive silver patterns. Journal of materials science, 41(13), 4153-4158.
49. Takeda, Y., Mae, S., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 80(1), 25-40.
50. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19-50.
51. Utterback, J. (1996). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
52. Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 93-115.
53. Wang, L., Notten, A., & Surpatean, A. (2013). Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: A keyword mining approach. Scientometrics, 94, 877-892.
54. Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34, 1591-1607.
55. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.