An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 894-908

  Lee, Hakyeon ^a   Kim, Chulhyun ^a   Cho, Hyunmyung ^a   Park, Yongtae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Analytic network process (ANP); Centrality; Core technology; Patent citation; Technology network

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; GRAPH THEORY; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SENSOR NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP); CENTRALITY; CORE TECHNOLOGY; PATENT CITATION; TECHNOLOGY NETWORK;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 53849092392     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agarwal A., Shankar R., and Tiwari M.K. Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research 173 1 (2006) 211-225
2. Archibugi D., and Pianta M. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16 (1996) 451-458
3. Ayaǧ Z., and Özdemir R.G. An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment. Journal of Engineering Design 18 3 (2007) 209-226
4. Basberg B.L. Patent statistics and the measurement of technological change: An assessment of the Norwegian patent data, 1840-1980. World Patent Information 6 (1984) 158-164
5. Basberg B.L. Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of literature. Research Policy 16 (1987) 131-141
6. Bayazit O., and Karpak B. An analytical network process-based framework for successful total quality management (TQM): An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness. International Journal of Production Economics 105 1 (2007) 79-96
7. Bonacich P., and Lloyd P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Social Networks 23 3 (2001) 191-201
8. Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2 (1972) 113-120
9. Borgatti S.P. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27 1 (2005) 55-71
10. Breitzman A., and Thomas P. Using patent citation analysis to target/value M&A candidates. Research Technology Management 45 (2002) 28-46
11. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Maleraba, F. (1998). Knowledge proximity and technological diversification, CESPRI, ISE Research Project.
12. Chang C.W., Wu C.R., Lin C.T., and Lin H.L. Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes. Information Sciences 177 16 (2007) 3383-3396
13. Chen D.-Z., Chang H.-W., Huang M.-H., and Fu F.-C. Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: A perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics 64 (2005) 31-53
14. Cheng E.W.L., and Li H. Analytic network process applied to project selection. Journal of construction engineering and management 131 4 (2005) 459-466
15. Chung S., Lee A., and Pearn W. Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics 96 1 (2005) 15-36
16. Courtial J.P., Callon M., and Sigogneau A. The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends. Scientometrics 26 2 (1993) 231-242
17. Demirtas, E. A., & Ustun, O. (2007). Analytic network process and multi-period goal programming integration in purchasing decisions. Computers & Industrial Engineering, doi:10.1016/j.cie.2006.12.006..
18. EIRMA (2000). Technology monitoring for business success. European Industrial Research Management Association, Working Group 55 Report.
19. Ernst H. Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information 25 3 (2003) 233-242
20. Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1 (1979) 215-239
21. Gangulli P. Patents and patent information in 1979 and 2004: A perspective from India. World Patent Information 26 (2004) 61-62
22. Gelsing L. Innovation and the development of industrial networks. In: Lundvall B.-A. (Ed). National systems of innovation - Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (1992), Pinter, London 116-128
23. Gencer C., and Gürpinar D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling 31 11 (2007) 2475-2486
24. Grilliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (1990) 1661-1707
25. Grupp H. Spillover effects and the science base of innovations reconsidered: An empirical approach. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 6 2 (1996) 175-197
26. Grupp H., Lacasa D., and Schmoch U. Tracing technological change over long periods in Germany in chemicals using patent statistics. Scientometrics 57 (2003) 175-195
27. Gun̈gor̈ A. Evaluation of connection types in design for disassembly (DFD) using analytic network process. Computers & Industrial Engineering 50 1/2 (2006) 35-54
28. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 8498.
29. Ham R.M., Linden G., and Appleyard M.M. The evolving role of semiconductor consortia in the United States and Japan. California Management Review 41 (1998) 137-163
30. Han Y., and Park Y. Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: The case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries. World Patent Information 28 3 (2006) 235-247
31. Harhoff D., Scherer F.M., and Vopel K. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy 32 8 (2003) 1343-1363
32. Hirschey M., and Richardson V.J. Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and US firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 9 1 (2001) 65-82
33. Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 6509.
34. Jharkharia S., and Shankar R. Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega 35 3 (2007) 274-289
35. Kahraman C., Ertay T., and Büyüközkan G. A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research 171 2 (2006) 390-411
36. Karsak E.E., Sozer S., and Alptekin S.E. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering 44 1 (2003) 171-190
37. Kim, Y. G., Suh, J. H., & Park, S. C. (2007). Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Systems with Applications, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.033.
38. Lai K.K., and Wu S.J. Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing & Management 41 2 (2005) 313-330
39. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (1999). The quality of ideas: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 7345.
40. Lee J.W., and Kim S.H. Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research 27 4 (2000) 367-382
41. Lin, Y. H., Chiu, C. C., & Tsai, C. H. (2007). The study of applying ANP model to assess dispatching rules for wafer fabrication. Expert Systems with Applications, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.033.
42. Marseden P., and Laumann E. Mathematical ideas in social structural analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10 (1984) 271-294
43. Meade L., and Presley A. R&D project selection using ANP. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 1 (2002) 22-28
44. Meade L., and Sarkis J. Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 34 3 (1998) 201-215
45. Meade L., and Sarkis J. Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytic network approach. International Journal of Production Research 37 2 (1999) 241-261
46. Mowery D.C., Oxley J.E., and Silverman B.S. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy 27 (1998) 507-523
47. Mulebeke J.A.W., and Zheng L. Analytical network process for software selection in product development: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 23 4 (2006) 337-352
48. Narin F. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30 (1994) 147-155
49. Narin F., Noma E., and Perry R. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy 16 (1987) 143-155
50. Niemira M.P., and Saaty T.L. An Analytic Network Process model for financial-crisis forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 20 4 (2004) 573-587
51. OECD (2005). Measuring globalization: OECD handbook on economic globalization indicators. OECD, Paris.
52. Reitzig M. Improving patent valuations for management purposes-validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy 33 6/7 (2004) 939-957
53. Ruhnau B. Eigenvector-centrality - a node-centrality?. Social Networks 22 4 (2000) 357-365
54. Saaty T. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
55. Saaty T. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (1996), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
56. Schapper, M. (2003). A proposal for a core list of indicators for ICT measurement. Electronic document at http://www.oecd.org, OECD.
57. Shin J., and Park Y. Building the national ICT frontier: The case of Korea. Information Economics and Policy 19 2 (2007) 249-277
58. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of inventions. Rand Journal of Economics 21 (1990) 172-187
59. Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., and Jaffe A.B. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and new technology 5 1 (1997) 19-50
60. USPTO (2006). Overview of the US patent classification system (USPC). Electronic document at http://www.uspto.gov, USPTO.
61. Wartburg I., Teichert T., and Rost K. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy 34 (2005) 1591-1607
62. Wasserman S., and Faust K. Social network analysis (1994), Cambridge University Press
63. Wei, W. L., & Chang, W. C. (2007). Analytic network process-based model for selecting an optimal product design solution with zero-one goal programming. Journal of Engineering Design, doi:10.1080/09544820601186054.
64. Wu W.W., and Lee Y.T. Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications 32 3 (2007) 841-847
65. Yoon B., and Park Y. A text-mining based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology 15 1 (2004) 37-50
66. Yüksel I., and Dag66deviren M. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences 177 16 (2007) 3364-3382