Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997-2008

Scientometrics

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 795-811

  Cho, Ta Shun ^a   Shih, Hsin Yu ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Core technology; Emerging technology; Network analysis; Patent citation; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255126803     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0457-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16, 451-458.
2. Basberg, B. L. (1984). Patent statistics and the measurement of technological change: An assessment of the Norwegian patent data, 1840-1980. World Patent Information, 6(4), 158-164.
3. Basberg, B. L. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of literature. Research Policy, 16, 131-141.
4. Bell, T. E., & Dooling, D. (2000). In J. Fouke (Ed.), Engineering tomorrow. New York: IEEE Press.
5. Bengisu, M. (2003). Critical and emerging technologies in materials, manufacturing, and industrial engineering: A study for priority setting. Scientometrics, 58(3), 473-487.
6. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for window: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
7. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. Carpenter, M. P., & Narin, F. (1983). Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence. World Patent Information, 5(3), 180-185.
9. Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160-163.
10. Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis. Technovation, 25(2), 155-169.
11. Chen, D. Z., Chang, H. W., Huang, M. H., & Fu, F. C. (2005). Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: A perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics, 64(1), 31-53.
12. Ganguli, P. (2004). Patents and patent information in 1979 and 2004: A perspective from India. World Patent Information, 26(1), 61-62.
13. Gress, B. (2010). Properties of the USPTO patent citation network: 1963-2002. World Patent Information, 32, 3-21.
14. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
15. Griliches, Z., & Lichtenberg, F. R. (1984). Interindustry technology flows and productivity growth: A reexamination. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(2), 324-329.
16. Griliches, Z., Pakes, A., & Hall, B. H. (1987). The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. In P. Dasgupta & P. Stoneman (Eds.), Economic policy and technological performance (pp. 97-124). England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Grupp, H. (1994). Technology at the beginning of the 21st century. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6(4), 379-409.
18. Grupp, H., Lacasa, I. D., & Schmoch, U. (2003). Tracing technological change over long periods in Germany in chemicals using patent statistics. Scientometrics, 57(2), 175-195.
19. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg M. (2001). Market value and patent citations: A first look. NBER working paper no. 7741. National Bureau of Economic Research.
20. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
21. Hung, S. C., & Chu, Y. Y. (2006). Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: Challenges for the public sector. Technovation, 26(1), 104-110.
22. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R& D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
23. Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S. (1983). Prominence. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 195-222). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Kung, M. H., & Lin, H. Y. (2003). The dynamics of innovation in Taiwan: The patent analysis respective. Taipei, Taiwan: International Conference on 2003 Industrial Science and Technology Innovation: Policy Issues and Challenges in a Critical Era.
25. Li, X., Chen, H., Huang, Z., & Roco, M. C. (2007). Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976-2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9, 337-352.
26. Manufacturing 2020 Panel. (2020). UK manufacturing: We can make it better. Kent, England: Findlay Publications.
27. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (1995). National critical technologies report. Washington D. C.: OSTP.
28. Shih, H. Y. (2006). Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism. Tourism Management, 27(5), 1027-1039.
29. Shin, J., & Park, Y. (2007). Building the national ICT frontier: The case of Korea. Information Economics and Policy, 19(2), 249-277.
30. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citation and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187.
31. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. B. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and new technology, 5(1), 19-50.
32. van der Valk, T., Moors, E. H. M., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2009). Conceptualizing patterns in the dynamics of emerging technologies: The case of biotechnology developments in the Netherlands. Technovation, 29(4), 247-264.
33. Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34, 1591-1607.
34. Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology, 15(1), 37-50.