University institutional repositories: Competitive environment and their role as communication media of scientific knowledge

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1283-1299

  Ruiz Conde, Enar ^a   Calderón Martínez, Aurora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Knowledge dissemination; Open access; Repository; Visibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892857471     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1159-5     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010a). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85, 243-256. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0190-z.
2. Aguillo, I. F., Ortega, J. L., Fernández, M., & Utrilla, A. M. (2010b). Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories. Scientometrics, 82(3), 477-486. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0183-y.
3. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63, 829-846.
4. Barrueco, J. M., & García, C. (2009). Repositorios institucionales universitarios: evolución y perspectivas. Zaragoza: Fesabid, XI Jornadas Españolas de Documentación.
5. Barrueco, J. M., & Subirats, I. (2003). Open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI-PMH): Descripción, funciones y aplicación de un protocolo. El Profesional de la Información, 12(2), 99-106.
6. Bergh, D., Perry, J., & Hanke, R. (2006). Some predictors of SMJ article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 81-100.
7. Billaut, J. C., Bouyssou, D., & Vincke, P. (2010). Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking: An MCDM view. Scientometrics, 84, 237-263.
8. Blank, R. M. (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1041-1067.
9. Carr, L., and Brody, T. (2007). Size isn't everything: sustainable repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles. D-Lib Magazine, 13(7/8). http://www. dlib. org/dlib/july07/carr/07carr. html.
10. Chen, C. (2003). Mapping scientific frontiers: the quest for knowledge visualization. London: Springer-Verlag.
11. Chuk, T., and McDonald, R. H. (2007). Measuring and comparing participation patterns in digital repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). http://openaccess. be/media/docs/09mcdonald. pdf.
12. Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 32, 195-201.
13. Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Technical Report 223. http://www. arl. org/sparc/bm~doc/ir_final_release_102-2. pdf.
14. Davis, P. M. (2010). Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals. Physiologist, 53(6), 197-200.
15. Ezema, I. J. (2011). Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigerian scholarly publication. Library Review, 60(6), 473-485. doi: 10. 1108/00242531111147198.
16. Galina, I. (2011). La visibilidad de los recursos académicos: una revisión crítica del papel de los repositorios institucionales y el acceso abierto. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 25(53), 159-183.
17. Garfunkel, J. M., Ulshen, M. H., Hamrick, H. J., & Lawon, E. E. (1994). Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 137-138.
18. Gaulé, P. A., & Maystre, N. B. (2011). Getting cited: does open access help? Research Policy, 40(10), 1332-1338. doi: 10. 1016/j. respol. 2011. 05. 025.
19. Giglia, E. (2010). The impact factor of open access journals: data and trends. ELPUB 2010 International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Helsinki, Finland. http://dhanken. shh. fi/dspace/bitstream/10227/599/72/2giglia. pdf.
20. Gordon, M. D. (1980). The role of referees in scientific communication. In J. Hartley (Ed.), The psychology of written communication: selected readings. London: Kogan.
21. Harnad, S. (2005). Fast-forward on the green road to open access: the case against mixing up green and gold. Ariadne, 4(42). http://www. ariadne. ac. uk/issue42/harnad.
22. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serial Review, 30(4), 310-314. doi: 10. 1016/j. serrev. 2004. 09. 013.
23. Hernández, T., Rodríguez, D., & Bueno, G. (2007). Open access: el papel de las bibliotecas en los repositorios institucionales de acceso abierto. Anales de Documentación, 10, 185-204.
24. Hixson, C. G. (2005). First we build them, then what?: The future of institutional repositories. BiD, Textos Universitaris de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 15. https://scholarsbank. uoregon. edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/1865/BID_IR_article. pdf?sequence=1.
25. Johnson, R. K. (2002). Institutional Repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11). http://www. dlib. org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson. html.
26. Jovanovic, M., Jeremic, V., Savic, G., Bulajic, M., & Martic, M. (2012). How does the normalization of data affects the ARWU ranking? Scientometrics, 93, 319-327. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-012-0674-0.
27. Keefer, A. (2007). Los repositorios digitales universitarios y los autores. Anales de Documentación, 10, 205-214. doi: 10. 6018/analesdoc. 10. 0. 1151.
28. Koopman, A., & Kipnis, D. (2009). Feeding the fledgling repository: starting an institutional repository at an academic health sciences library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 28(2), 111-122. doi: 10. 1080/02763860902816628.
29. Krishnamurthy, M., & Kemparaju, T. D. (2011). Institutional repositories in Indian universities and research institutes: a study. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 45(2), 185-198. doi: 10. 1108/00330331111129723.
30. Link, A. M. (1998). US and non-US submission: an analysis of review bias. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 246-247.
31. Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities: methodologies and problems. Higher Education in Europe, 30, 127-136.
32. Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the Digital Age. ARL Bimonthly Report, 226, 1-7. http://www. arl. org/newsltr/226/ir. htm.
33. Lynch, C. A., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005). Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). http://www. dlib. org/dlib/september05/lynch/09lynch. html.
34. Mahoney, M. J., Kazdin, A. E., & Kenigsberg, M. (1978). Getting published. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2(1), 69-70.
35. Peset, F., & Ferrer, A. (2008). Implementation of the open archives initiative in Spain. Information Research, 13(4). http://informationr. net/ir/13-4/paper385. html.
36. Peset, F., Ferrer, A., Subirats, I., & Muñoz, A. (2007). Use of OAI protocol and its impact in digital libraries: a case study in Spain, Portugal and Latin America. In Prasad, ARD & Madalli, Devika P., Eds. Proceedings International Conference on Semantic Web and Digital Libraries. http://eprints. rclis. org/archive/00010931/.
37. Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of publisher articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 187-255.
38. Pinfield, S. (2009). Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship? Learned Publishing, 22(3), 165-175. doi: 10. 1087/2009302.
39. Rodríguez-Ruiz, O., & Fernández-Menéndez, J. (2009). Intellectual capital revisited: a citation analysis of 10 years of research in the area (1997-2007). Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 7(3), 203-219. doi: 10. 2753/JMR1536-5433070303.
40. Sánchez, S., & Melero, R. (2006). La denominación y el contenido de los repositorios institucionales en acceso abierto: base teórica para la "ruta verde". http://eprints. rclis. org/6368/.
41. Secker, J. (2004). Electronic resources in the virtual learning environment. Oxford: Chandos.
42. Snodgrass, R. T. (2006). Single-versus double-blind reviewing: an analysis of the literature. ACM Sigmond Record, 35(3), 8-21.
43. Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. (2007). The quest for citations: drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71, 171-193.
44. Stukalina, Y. (2010). The management of integrated educational environment resources: The factors to be considered. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 345-361.
45. Suber, P. (2006). Open access overview: focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. http://www. earlham. edu/~peters/fos/overview. htm.
46. Subirats, I., Onyancha, I., Salokhe, G., Kaloyanova, S., Anibaldi, S., & Keizer, J. (2008). Towards an architecture for open archive networks in agricultural sciences and technology. Online Information Review, 32(4), 478-487. doi: 10. 1108/14684520810897359.
47. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005a). Fatal attraction: Ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133-145.
48. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005b). Reply to the comments of Liu et al. Scientometrics, 64, 111-112.
49. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 169-202.
50. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., van Eck, N. J., et al. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419-2432. doi: 10. 1002/asi.
51. Weisberg, S. (2005). Applied linear regression. New Jersey: Wiley.
52. Wray, B. A., Mathieu, R. G., & Teets, J. M. (2009). Identifying how determinants impact security-based open source software project success using rule induction. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, 2(4), 352-362. doi: 10. 1504/IJEMR. 2009. 025249.
53. Xia, J., & Sun, L. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Depositorship and full-text availability. Serials Review, 33(1), 14-21.
54. Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9(1), 66-100.