Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery

Heart

Volumn 95, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 1612-1618

  Hetherington, Simon L ^a   Adam, Z ^a   Morley, R ^a   De Belder, M A ^a   Hall, J A ^a   Muir, D F ^a   Sutton, A G C ^a   Swanson, N ^a   Wright, R A ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIATION DOSE; RISK ASSESSMENT; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349466498     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.170233     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20. (Pubitemid 36050955)
2. Aguirre FV, Topol EJ, Ferguson JJ, et al. Bleeding complications with the chimeric antibody to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. EPIC Investigators. Circulation 1995;91:2882-2890
3. The EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. The EPIC Investigation. N Engl J Med 1994;330:956-961
4. Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:930-935 (Pubitemid 37214804)
5. Eichhofer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, et al. Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: a large single-center experience. Am Heart J 2008;156:864-870
6. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009;157:132-140
7. Kassam S, Cantor WJ, Patel D, et al. Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Can J Cardiol 2004;20:1439-1442 (Pubitemid 40103649)
8. Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim HJ, et al. Primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction via the transradial approach: a safe and useful alternative to the transfemoral approach. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:292-296
9. Louvard Y, Ludwig J, Lefevre T, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a dual-center registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:206-211 (Pubitemid 34127381)
10. Mathias DW, Bigler L. Transradial coronary angioplasty and stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:547-549
11. Mulukutla SR, Cohen HA. Feasibility and efficacy of transradial access for coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:167-171
12. Ochiai M, Isshiki T, Toyoizumi H, et al. Efficacy of transradial primary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:966-8, A10. (Pubitemid 29143143)
13. Steg G, Aubry P. Radial access for primary PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarction and contraindication or impossible femoral access. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:424-426 (Pubitemid 26423994)
14. Valsecchi O, Musumeci G, Vassileva A, et al. Safety, feasibility and efficacy of transradial primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Ital Heart J 2003;4:329-334 (Pubitemid 37362121)
15. Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R, et al. Comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:598-600. (Pubitemid 36263265)
16. Pristipino C, Trani C, Nazzaro MS, et al. Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart 2009;95:476-482
17. Jones RH, Kesler K, Phillips HR III, et al. Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1013-1025 (Pubitemid 26146056)
18. Smith LR, Harrell FE Jr, Rankin JS, et al. Determinants of early versus late cardiac death in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1991;84(suppl):III245-53.
19. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008;94:1019-1025
20. Montalescot G, Ongen Z, Guindy R, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing PCI. Results of the RIVIERA study. Int J Cardiol 2007 Dec 3 [Epub ahead of print].
21. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:349-356 (Pubitemid 38950594)
22. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction - the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005;150:543-549 (Pubitemid 41317627)
23. Kim JY, Yoon J, Jung HS, et al. Feasibility of the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Yonsei Med J 2005;46:503-510 (Pubitemid 41283061)
24. Philippe F, Larrazet F, Meziane T, et al. Comparison of transradial vs transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:67-73. (Pubitemid 38036793)
25. Ranjan A, Patel TM, Shah SC, et al. Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up. Indian Heart J 2005;57:681-687 (Pubitemid 43332289)
26. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:26-33. (Pubitemid 36528794)
27. Ziakas A, Gomma A, McDonald J, et al. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Acute Card Care 2007;9:93-96 (Pubitemid 46955235)
28. Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, et al. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart 2007;93:1556-1561 (Pubitemid 350205549)
29. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275 (Pubitemid 27201945)
30. Rubenstein MH, Harrell LC, Sheynberg BV, et al. Are patients with renal failure good candidates for percutaneous coronary revascularization in the new device era? Circulation 2000;102:2966-2972
31. Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart 2009;95:410-415
32. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol 2005;101:421-427 (Pubitemid 40719979)
33. Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van dH I, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2008;358:557-567 (Pubitemid 351214283)
34. Marenzi G, Lauri G, Assanelli E, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1780-1785 (Pubitemid 39424075)
35. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Campodonico J, et al. Contrast volume during primary percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent contrast-induced nephropathy and mortality. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:170-177
36. Geise RA, O'Dea TJ. Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Appl Radiat Isot 1999;50:173-184