Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling?

Ecography

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 191-203

  Naimi, Babak ^a,b   Hamm, Nicholas A S ^a   Groen, Thomas A ^a   Skidmore, Andrew K ^a   Toxopeus, Albertus G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MUSEUM; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NETHERLANDS; SPAIN;

EID: 84892673138     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anselin L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geogr. Anal. 27: 93-115.
2. Araújo M. B. and Guisan A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1677-1688.
3. Araújo M. B. and New M. 2006. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 42-47.
4. Austin M. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol. Model. 157: 101-118.
5. Austin M. P. et al. 2006. Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: role of artificial data and theory. Ecol. Model. 199: 197-216.
6. Beven K. and Kirkby M. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. J. 24: 43-69.
7. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45: 5-32.
8. Buermann W. et al. 2008. Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data. J. Biogeogr. 35: 1160-1176.
9. Bystriakova N. et al. 2012. Sampling bias in geographic and environmental space and its effect on the predictive power of species distribution models. Syst. Biodivers. 10: 305-315.
10. Chapman A. D. 2005. Uses of primary species occurrence data, version 1.0. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen.
11. Chatterjee S. and Hadi A. S. 2006. Regression analysis by example. - Wiley.
12. Cliff A. D. and Ord J. K. 1981. Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion.
13. Cressie N. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. - Wiley.
14. Cutler D. R. et al. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88: 2783-2792.
15. de Cabrera T. 2007. Microtus cabrerae . - In: Marti R. and Del Moral J. C. (eds), Atlas de las aves reproductoras de Españia. SECEM-SECEMU, pp. 429-431.
16. Dormann C. F. et al. 2012. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 35: 1-20.
17. Duckworth W. D. et al. 1993. Preserving natural science collections: chronicle of our environmental heritage. National Inst. for the Conservation of Cultural Property.
18. Elith J. and Graham C. H. 2009. Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32: 66-77.
19. Elith J. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
20. Elith J. et al. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 802-813.
21. Engler R. et al. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 263-274.
22. Farber O. and Kadmon R. 2003. Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance. Ecol. Model. 160: 115-130.
23. Feeley K. J. and Silman M. R. 2010. Modelling the responses of Andean and Amazonian plant species to climate change: the effects of georeferencing errors and the importance of data filtering. J. Biogeogr. 37: 733-740.
24. Fielding A. H. and Bell J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24: 38-49.
25. Franklin J. 2010. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
26. Friedman J. H. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29: 1189-1232.
27. Friedman M. 1937. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 32: 675-701.
28. Getis A. 2010. Spatial autocorrelation. - In: Fischer M. M. and Getis A. (eds), Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Springer, pp. 255-278.
29. Getis A. and Ord J. K. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24: 189-206.
30. Getis A. and Ord J. K. 1996. Local spatial statistics: an overview. - In: Longley P. and Batty M. (eds), Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Wiley, pp. 261-277.
31. Goodchild M. F. 1986. Spatial autocorrelation. - Geo Books.
32. Graham C. H. et al. 2004. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 497-503.
33. Graham C. H. et al. 2008. The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 239-247.
34. Graham M. H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84: 2809-2815.
35. Guisan A. et al. 2007. What matters for predicting the occurrences of trees: techniques, data, or species' characteristics? Ecol. Monogr. 77: 615-630.
36. Guo Q. et al. 2008. Georeferencing locality descriptions and computing associated uncertainty using a probabilistic approach. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 22: 1067-1090.
37. Hamm N. et al. 2004. On the effect of positional uncertainty in field measurements on the atmospheric correction of remotely sensed imagery. - In: Sanchez-Vila X. et al. (eds), geoENV IV - geostatistics for environmental applications. Springer, pp. 91-102.
38. Hamm N. A. S. et al. 2012. A per-pixel, non-stationary mixed model for empirical line atmospheric correction in remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 124: 666-678.
39. Hastie T. 2011. GAM: generalized additive models.
40. Hastie T. and Tibshirani R. 1990. Generalised additive models. - Chapman and Hall.
41. Hernandez P. A. et al. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29: 773-785.
42. Heuvelink G. B. M. 1999. Propagation of error in spatial modelling with GIS. - In: Longley P. et al. (eds), Geographical information systems. Wiley, pp. 207-217.
43. Hijmans R. and van Etten J. 2011. Raster: geographic analysis and modeling with raster data.
44. Hirzel A. H. et al. 2001. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol. Model. 145: 111-121.
45. Jiménez-Valverde A. et al. 2009. The effect of prevalence and its interaction with sample size on the reliability of species distribution models. Community Ecol. 10: 196-205.
46. Karatzoglou A. et al. 2006. Support vector machines in R. J. Stat. Softw. 15: 1-28.
47. Le Lay G. et al. 2010. Prospective sampling based on model ensembles improves the detection of rare species. Ecography 33: 1015-1027.
48. Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation - trouble or new paradigm. Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
49. Leitão P. J. et al. 2011. Effects of geographical data sampling bias on habitat models of species distributions: a case study with steppe birds in southern Portugal. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 25: 439-453.
50. Liaw A. and Wiener M. 2002. Classification and regression by random forest. R news 2: 18-22.
51. Lobo J. M. et al. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 145-151.
52. Lobo J. M. et al. 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography 33: 103-114.
53. Manel S. et al. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 921-931.
54. Marmion M. et al. 2009. The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species. Ecol. Model. 220: 3512-3520.
55. Marquardt D. W. 1970. Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12: 591-612.
56. McCullagh P. and Nelder J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall.
57. McPherson J. M. and Jetz W. 2007. Effects of species' ecology on the accuracy of distribution models. Ecography 30: 135-151.
58. Meridional C.l. 2007. Coronella girondica . - In: Pleguezuelos J. M. et al. (eds), Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y reptiles de España. DGCN-AHE, pp. 275-277.
59. Meynard C. N. and Quinn J. F. 2007. Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J. Biogeogr. 34: 1455-1469.
60. Naimi B. et al. 2011. Spatial autocorrelation in predictors reduces the impact of positional uncertainty in occurrence data on species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 38: 1497-1509.
61. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center 2011. Modis/Terra. 2002-2010. - LP DAAC.
62. Negro P. 2007. Dryocopus martius . - In: Marti R. and Del Moral J. C. (eds), Atlas de las aves reproductoras de Españia. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza - Sociedad Española de Ornitología, pp. 354-355.
63. Niamir A. et al. 2011. Finessing atlas data for species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 17: 1173-1185.
64. Ord J. K. and Getis A. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics - distributional issues and an application. Geogr. Anal. 27: 286-306.
65. Ord J. K. and Getis A. 2001. Testing for local spatial autocorrelation in the presence of global autocorrelation. J. Reg. Sci. 41: 411-432.
66. Osborne P. E. and Leitão P. J. 2009. Effects of species and habitat positional errors on the performance and interpretation of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 15: 671-681.
67. Peterson A. T. et al. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions: E-book. - Princeton Univ.
68. Phillips S. J. and Dudik M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
69. Phillips S. J. et al. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190: 231-259.
70. Santika T. and Hutchinson M. F. 2009. The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference. Ecol. Model. 220: 2365-2379.
71. Skidmore A. K. et al. 1996. Classification of kangaroo habitat distribution using three GIS models. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Syst. 10: 441-454.
72. Thuiller W. et al. 2009. BIOMOD - a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32: 369-373.
73. Vapnik V. 1995. The nature of statistical learning theory. - Springer.
74. Wieczorek J. et al. 2004. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 18: 745-767.
75. Zaniewski A. E. et al. 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecol. Model. 157: 261-280.