The Role of iPads in Constructing Collaborative Learning Spaces

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 165-178

  Fisher, Brian ^a   Lucas, Timothy ^a   Galstyan, Araksi ^a  

^a PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business calculus; Classroom technology; IPad; Learning spaces

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; STUDENTS;

CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION; IPAD; LEARNING SPACES; MATHEMATICS EDUCATION; PORTABLE DEVICE; STUDENT INTERACTIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84892542459     PISSN: 22111662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-013-9207-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AP. (2006). Law professor bans laptops in class, over student protest. USA Today. http://www.usatoday. com/tech/news/2006-03-21-professor-laptop-ban-x. htm.
2. Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing engagement: Contributions of faculty to student engagement in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 339-353
3. Chester, T. M. (2010). Cio predicament: What to do about the ipad. Campus Technology. URL http://campustechnology.com/articles/2010/05/05/cio- predicament-what-to-do-about-the-ipad.aspx.
4. Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
5. Cory, B. L., & Garofalo, J. (2011). Using dynamic sketches to enhance preservice secondary mathematics teachers' understanding of limits of sequences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 65-97
6. Dautenhahn, K., & Werry, I. (2004). Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: Background motivation and challenges. Pragmatics and Cognition, 12(1), 1-35.
7. della Cava, M. R. (2010). Does ipad have the magic to bring people together? USA Today. URL http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2010-06-07- ipadculture07-CV-N.htm
8. Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M.-A., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., et al. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In Mathematics education and technology-Rethinking the terrain, (pp. 89-132). Springer
9. Drijvers, P., & Trouche, L. (2008). From artifacts to instruments: A theoretical framework behind the orchestra metaphor. Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, 2, 363-392.
10. Engestro?m, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156
11. Engestro?m, Y., Miettinen, R., Punama?ki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ernest, P. (1994). The dialogical nature of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics, education and philosophy: An international persective, vol. 3 of studies in mathematics education series. The Falmer Press.
13. Ernest, P. (2010). Reflections on theories of learning. In B. Sriraman, & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking New Frontiers, Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer.
14. Fusch, D. (2011). Piloting the ipad. Academic Impressions. http://www.academicimpressions.com/news/piloting-ipad
15. Güçler, B., Hegedus, S., Robidoux, R., & Jackiw, N. (2013). Investigating the mathematical discourse of young learners involved in multi-modal mathematical investigations: The case of haptic technologies. In D. Martinovic, V. Freiman, & Z. Karadag (Eds.), Visual Mathematics and Cyberlearning, vol. 1 of Mathematics Education in the Digital Era (pp. 97-118). Springer: Netherlands.
16. Graetz, K. A. (2006). The psychology of learning environments. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces, chap. 6. Educause. http://www.educause.edu/ learningspaces.
17. Granott, N. (1993). Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and weird creatures. In R. H. Wozniak, & K. W. Fisher (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 183-207). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
18. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
19. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9, 1315-1318.
20. Hegedus, S., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2011). The emergence of mathematical structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 369-388
21. Hu, W. (2011). Math that moves: Schools embrace the ipad. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/05/education/05tablets.htm.
22. Jaimes, A., & Sebe, N. (2007). Multimodal human-computer interaction: A survey. Computer Vsion and Image Understanding, 108(1-2), 116-134.
23. James, K., Humphrey, G., Vilis, T., Corrie, B., Baddour, R., & Goodale, M. (2002). Active and passive learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behavior Research Methods, 34, 383-390.
24. Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: Students' interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 55-85.
25. Kolowich, S. (2010). Apple of their eye? Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/12/22/college-students-test-drive-the- apple-ipad.
26. Lakoff, G., & Nún?ez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books
27. Liu, C.-C., Chung, C.-W., Chen, N.-S., & Liu, B.-J. (2009). Analysis of peer interaction in learning activities with personal handhelds and shared displays. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 127-142
28. Mayer, R. E., (2009). Multimedia learning. 2nd ed Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Moreno-Armella, L., & Hegedus, S. J. (2009). Co-action with digital technologies. ZDM, 41(4), 505-519.
30. Raines, J. M., & Clark, L. M. (2011). A brief overview on using technology to engage students in mathematics. Current Issues in Education, 14(2), 1-6.
31. Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistryincorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 285-302
32. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne: ACER Press.
33. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.